Literature DB >> 22665505

Multifeature landmark-free active appearance models: application to prostate MRI segmentation.

Robert Toth1, Anant Madabhushi.   

Abstract

Active shape models (ASMs) and active appearance models (AAMs) are popular approaches for medical image segmentation that use shape information to drive the segmentation process. Both approaches rely on image derived landmarks (specified either manually or automatically) to define the object's shape, which require accurate triangulation and alignment. An alternative approach to modeling shape is the levelset representation, defined as a set of signed distances to the object's surface. In addition, using multiple image derived attributes (IDAs) such as gradient information has previously shown to offer improved segmentation results when applied to ASMs, yet little work has been done exploring IDAs in the context of AAMs. In this work, we present a novel AAM methodology that utilizes the levelset implementation to overcome the issues relating to specifying landmarks, and locates the object of interest in a new image using a registration based scheme. Additionally, the framework allows for incorporation of multiple IDAs. Our multifeature landmark-free AAM (MFLAAM) utilizes an efficient, intuitive, and accurate algorithm for identifying those IDAs that will offer the most accurate segmentations. In this paper, we evaluate our MFLAAM scheme for the problem of prostate segmentation from T2-w MRI volumes. On a cohort of 108 studies, the levelset MFLAAM yielded a mean Dice accuracy of 88% ± 5%, and a mean surface error of 1.5 mm ±.8 mm with a segmentation time of 150/s per volume. In comparison, a state of the art AAM yielded mean Dice and surface error values of 86% ± 9% and 1.6 mm ± 1.0 mm, respectively. The differences with respect to our levelset-based MFLAAM model are statistically significant . In addition, our results were in most cases superior to several recent state of the art prostate MRI segmentation methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22665505     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2201498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  39 in total

1.  Automatic prostate MR image segmentation with sparse label propagation and domain-specific manifold regularization.

Authors:  Shu Liao; Yaozong Gao; Yinghuan Shi; Ambereen Yousuf; Ibrahim Karademir; Aytekin Oto; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2013

2.  Simultaneous Segmentation of Prostatic Zones Using Active Appearance Models With Multiple Coupled Levelsets.

Authors:  Robert Toth; Justin Ribault; John Gentile; Dan Sperling; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  A semiautomatic approach for prostate segmentation in MR images using local texture classification and statistical shape modeling.

Authors:  Maysam Shahedi; Martin Halicek; Qinmei Li; Lizhi Liu; Zhenfeng Zhang; Sadhna Verma; David M Schuster; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-08

4.  Prostatome: a combined anatomical and disease based MRI atlas of the prostate.

Authors:  Mirabela Rusu; B Nicolas Bloch; Carl C Jaffe; Elizabeth M Genega; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky; Ernest Feleppa; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Interactive prostate segmentation using atlas-guided semi-supervised learning and adaptive feature selection.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Park; Yaozong Gao; Yinghuan Shi; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Accuracy Validation of an Automated Method for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Maysam Shahedi; Derek W Cool; Glenn S Bauman; Matthew Bastian-Jordan; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Postediting prostate magnetic resonance imaging segmentation consistency and operator time using manual and computer-assisted segmentation: multiobserver study.

Authors:  Maysam Shahedi; Derek W Cool; Cesare Romagnoli; Glenn S Bauman; Matthew Bastian-Jordan; George Rodrigues; Belal Ahmad; Michael Lock; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-07

8.  Nonlocal regularization for active appearance model: Application to medial temporal lobe segmentation.

Authors:  Shiyan Hu; Pierrick Coupé; Jens C Pruessner; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Deeply supervised 3D fully convolutional networks with group dilated convolution for automatic MRI prostate segmentation.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Yang Lei; Sibo Tian; Tonghe Wang; Yingzi Liu; Pretesh Patel; Ashesh B Jani; Hui Mao; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Visual saliency-based active learning for prostate magnetic resonance imaging segmentation.

Authors:  Dwarikanath Mahapatra; Joachim M Buhmann
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.