Literature DB >> 32528212

A semiautomatic approach for prostate segmentation in MR images using local texture classification and statistical shape modeling.

Maysam Shahedi1, Martin Halicek1,2, Qinmei Li1,3, Lizhi Liu4, Zhenfeng Zhang3, Sadhna Verma5, David M Schuster6, Baowei Fei1,7.   

Abstract

Segmentation of the prostate in magnetic resonance (MR) images has many applications in image-guided treatment planning and procedures such as biopsy and focal therapy. However, manual delineation of the prostate boundary is a time-consuming task with high inter-observer variation. In this study, we proposed a semiautomated, three-dimensional (3D) prostate segmentation technique for T2-weighted MR images based on shape and texture analysis. The prostate gland shape is usually globular with a smoothly curved surface that could be accurately modeled and reconstructed if the locations of a limited number of well-distributed surface points are known. For a training image set, we used an inter-subject correspondence between the prostate surface points to model the prostate shape variation based on a statistical point distribution modeling. We also studied the local texture difference between prostate and non-prostate tissues close to the prostate surface. To segment a new image, we used the learned prostate shape and texture characteristics to search for the prostate border close to an initially estimated prostate surface. We used 23 MR images for training, and 14 images for testing the algorithm performance. We compared the results to two sets of experts' manual reference segmentations. The measured mean ± standard deviation of error values for the whole gland were 1.4 ± 0.4 mm, 8.5 ± 2.0 mm, and 86 ± 3% in terms of mean absolute distance (MAD), Hausdorff distance (HDist), and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The average measured differences between the two experts on the same datasets were 1.5 mm (MAD), 9.0 mm (HDist), and 83% (DSC). The proposed algorithm illustrated a fast, accurate, and robust performance for 3D prostate segmentation. The accuracy of the algorithm is within the inter-expert variability observed in manual segmentation and comparable to the best performance results reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32528212      PMCID: PMC7289512          DOI: 10.1117/12.2512282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  21 in total

1.  Multifeature landmark-free active appearance models: application to prostate MRI segmentation.

Authors:  Robert Toth; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  The use of an active appearance model for automated prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Anne Sofie Korsager; Ulrik Landberg Stephansen; Jesper Carl; Lasse Riis Østergaard
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Prostate MRI segmentation using learned semantic knowledge and graph cuts.

Authors:  Dwarikanath Mahapatra; Joachim M Buhmann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Spatially varying accuracy and reproducibility of prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance images using manual and semiautomated methods.

Authors:  Maysam Shahedi; Derek W Cool; Cesare Romagnoli; Glenn S Bauman; Matthew Bastian-Jordan; Eli Gibson; George Rodrigues; Belal Ahmad; Michael Lock; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Postediting prostate magnetic resonance imaging segmentation consistency and operator time using manual and computer-assisted segmentation: multiobserver study.

Authors:  Maysam Shahedi; Derek W Cool; Cesare Romagnoli; Glenn S Bauman; Matthew Bastian-Jordan; George Rodrigues; Belal Ahmad; Michael Lock; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-11-07

6.  Automatic magnetic resonance prostate segmentation by deep learning with holistically nested networks.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Holger R Roth; Nathan Lay; Le Lu; Baris Turkbey; William Gandler; Evan S McCreedy; Tom Pohida; Peter A Pinto; Peter Choyke; Matthew J McAuliffe; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-21

Review 7.  Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI: Technology and Applications.

Authors:  Lizhi Liu; Zhiqiang Tian; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Cancer statistics, 2016.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Sparse patch-based label propagation for accurate prostate localization in CT images.

Authors:  Shu Liao; Yaozong Gao; Jun Lian; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Fully automated segmentation of prostate whole gland and transition zone in diffusion-weighted MRI using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Tyler Clark; Junjie Zhang; Sameer Baig; Alexander Wong; Masoom A Haider; Farzad Khalvati
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Automatic Segmentation of the Prostate on MR Images based on Anatomy and Deep Learning.

Authors:  Lei Tao; Ling Ma; Maoqiang Xie; Xiabi Liu; Zhiqiang Tian; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-02-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.