Literature DB >> 28342043

Accuracy Validation of an Automated Method for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Maysam Shahedi1,2,3, Derek W Cool4,5, Glenn S Bauman6,7,8, Matthew Bastian-Jordan5, Aaron Fenster4,9,5,7, Aaron D Ward6,9,7,8.   

Abstract

Three dimensional (3D) manual segmentation of the prostate on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a laborious and time-consuming task that is subject to inter-observer variability. In this study, we developed a fully automatic segmentation algorithm for T2-weighted endorectal prostate MRI and evaluated its accuracy within different regions of interest using a set of complementary error metrics. Our dataset contained 42 T2-weighted endorectal MRI from prostate cancer patients. The prostate was manually segmented by one observer on all of the images and by two other observers on a subset of 10 images. The algorithm first coarsely localizes the prostate in the image using a template matching technique. Then, it defines the prostate surface using learned shape and appearance information from a set of training images. To evaluate the algorithm, we assessed the error metric values in the context of measured inter-observer variability and compared performance to that of our previously published semi-automatic approach. The automatic algorithm needed an average execution time of ∼60 s to segment the prostate in 3D. When compared to a single-observer reference standard, the automatic algorithm has an average mean absolute distance of 2.8 mm, Dice similarity coefficient of 82%, recall of 82%, precision of 84%, and volume difference of 0.5 cm3 in the mid-gland. Concordant with other studies, accuracy was highest in the mid-gland and lower in the apex and base. Loss of accuracy with respect to the semi-automatic algorithm was less than the measured inter-observer variability in manual segmentation for the same task.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D segmentation; Automatic segmentation; Endorectal receive coil; Image segmentation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28342043      PMCID: PMC5681466          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-9964-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  22 in total

1.  Automatic prostate MR image segmentation with sparse label propagation and domain-specific manifold regularization.

Authors:  Shu Liao; Yaozong Gao; Yinghuan Shi; Ambereen Yousuf; Ibrahim Karademir; Aytekin Oto; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2013

2.  Prostate MRI segmentation using learned semantic knowledge and graph cuts.

Authors:  Dwarikanath Mahapatra; Joachim M Buhmann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Combining a deformable model and a probabilistic framework for an automatic 3D segmentation of prostate on MRI.

Authors:  Nasr Makni; P Puech; R Lopes; A S Dewalle; O Colot; N Betrouni
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Spatially varying accuracy and reproducibility of prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance images using manual and semiautomated methods.

Authors:  Maysam Shahedi; Derek W Cool; Cesare Romagnoli; Glenn S Bauman; Matthew Bastian-Jordan; Eli Gibson; George Rodrigues; Belal Ahmad; Michael Lock; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: the PROMISE12 challenge.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Robert Toth; Wendy van de Ven; Caroline Hoeks; Sjoerd Kerkstra; Bram van Ginneken; Graham Vincent; Gwenael Guillard; Neil Birbeck; Jindang Zhang; Robin Strand; Filip Malmberg; Yangming Ou; Christos Davatzikos; Matthias Kirschner; Florian Jung; Jing Yuan; Wu Qiu; Qinquan Gao; Philip Eddie Edwards; Bianca Maan; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Soumya Ghose; Jhimli Mitra; Jason Dowling; Dean Barratt; Henkjan Huisman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Role of endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in defining treatable intraprostatic tumor foci in prostate cancer: quantitative analysis of imaging contour compared to whole-mount histopathology.

Authors:  Mekhail Anwar; Antonio C Westphalen; Adam J Jung; Susan M Noworolski; Jeffry P Simko; John Kurhanewicz; Mack Roach; Peter R Carroll; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Oguz Akin; Evis Sala; Chaya S Moskowitz; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Nicole M Ishill; Darko Pucar; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel Vigneron; Peter Carroll; Fergus Coakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

9.  Expandable and rigid endorectal coils for prostate MRI: impact on prostate distortion and rigid image registration.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; I-Chow J Hsu; Jean Pouliot; Susan Moyher Noworolski; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Toward Prostate Cancer Contouring Guidelines on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Dominant Lesion Gross and Clinical Target Volume Coverage Via Accurate Histology Fusion.

Authors:  Eli Gibson; Glenn S Bauman; Cesare Romagnoli; Derek W Cool; Matthew Bastian-Jordan; Zahra Kassam; Mena Gaed; Madeleine Moussa; José A Gómez; Stephen E Pautler; Joseph L Chin; Cathie Crukley; Masoom A Haider; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  9 in total

1.  A semiautomatic approach for prostate segmentation in MR images using local texture classification and statistical shape modeling.

Authors:  Maysam Shahedi; Martin Halicek; Qinmei Li; Lizhi Liu; Zhenfeng Zhang; Sadhna Verma; David M Schuster; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2019-03-08

2.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Automatic zonal segmentation of the prostate from 2D and 3D T2-weighted MRI and evaluation for clinical use.

Authors:  Dimitri Hamzaoui; Sarah Montagne; Raphaële Renard-Penna; Nicholas Ayache; Hervé Delingette
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-03-14

4.  Learning rate of students detecting and annotating pediatric wrist fractures in supervised artificial intelligence dataset preparations.

Authors:  Eszter Nagy; Robert Marterer; Franko Hržić; Erich Sorantin; Sebastian Tschauner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Integration of Deep Learning and Active Shape Models for More Accurate Prostate Segmentation in 3D MR Images.

Authors:  Massimo Salvi; Bruno De Santi; Bianca Pop; Martino Bosco; Valentina Giannini; Daniele Regge; Filippo Molinari; Kristen M Meiburger
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-05-11

6.  Challenge of prostate MRI segmentation on T2-weighted images: inter-observer variability and impact of prostate morphology.

Authors:  Sarah Montagne; Dimitri Hamzaoui; Alexandre Allera; Malek Ezziane; Anna Luzurier; Raphaelle Quint; Mehdi Kalai; Nicholas Ayache; Hervé Delingette; Raphaële Renard-Penna
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-06-05

7.  Methodological approach to create an atlas using a commercial auto-contouring software.

Authors:  Marta Casati; Stefano Piffer; Silvia Calusi; Livia Marrazzo; Gabriele Simontacchi; Vanessa Di Cataldo; Daniela Greto; Isacco Desideri; Marco Vernaleone; Giulio Francolini; Lorenzo Livi; Stefania Pallotta
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Accuracy of tumor segmentation from multi-parametric prostate MRI and 18F-choline PET/CT for focal prostate cancer therapy applications.

Authors:  Morand Piert; Prasad R Shankar; Jeffrey Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Virginia Rogers; Javed Siddiqui; Thekkelnaycke Rajendiran; Jason Hearn; Arvin George; Xia Shao; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.138

9.  Evaluation of Multimodal Algorithms for the Segmentation of Multiparametric MRI Prostate Images.

Authors:  Ying-Hwey Nai; Bernice W Teo; Nadya L Tan; Koby Yi Wei Chua; Chun Kit Wong; Sophie O'Doherty; Mary C Stephenson; Josh Schaefferkoetter; Yee Liang Thian; Edmund Chiong; Anthonin Reilhac
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.238

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.