| Literature DB >> 22662127 |
Virginie F Labrousse1, Agnès Nadjar, Corinne Joffre, Laurence Costes, Agnès Aubert, Stéphane Grégoire, Lionel Bretillon, Sophie Layé.
Abstract
Regular consumption of food enriched in omega3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω3 PUFAs) has been shown to reduce risk of cognitive decline in elderly, and possibly development of Alzheimer's disease. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) are the most likely active components of ω3-rich PUFAs diets in the brain. We therefore hypothesized that exposing mice to a DHA and EPA enriched diet may reduce neuroinflammation and protect against memory impairment in aged mice. For this purpose, mice were exposed to a control diet throughout life and were further submitted to a diet enriched in EPA and DHA during 2 additional months. Cytokine expression together with a thorough analysis of astrocytes morphology assessed by a 3D reconstruction was measured in the hippocampus of young (3-month-old) and aged (22-month-old) mice. In addition, the effects of EPA and DHA on spatial memory and associated Fos activation in the hippocampus were assessed. We showed that a 2-month EPA/DHA treatment increased these long-chain ω3 PUFAs in the brain, prevented cytokines expression and astrocytes morphology changes in the hippocampus and restored spatial memory deficits and Fos-associated activation in the hippocampus of aged mice. Collectively, these data indicated that diet-induced accumulation of EPA and DHA in the brain protects against neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment linked to aging, further reinforcing the idea that increased EPA and DHA intake may provide protection to the brain of aged subjects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22662127 PMCID: PMC3360741 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Composition of the diets (g/kg diet).
| Ingredient | Amount |
| Casein | 180 |
| Cornstarch | 460 |
| Sucrose | 230 |
| Cellulose | 20 |
| Fat | 50 |
| Mineral mix | 50 |
| Vitamin mix | 10 |
: for detailed composition, see Table 2.
: composition (g/kg): sucrose, 110.7; CaCO3, 240; K2HPO4, 215; CaHPO4, 215; MgSO4,7H2O, 100; NaCl, 60; MgO, 40; FeSO4,7H2O, 8; ZnSO4,7H2O, 7; MnSO4,H2O, 2; CuSO4,5H2O, 1; Na2SiO7,3H2O, 0.5; AlK(SO4)2,12H2O, 0.2; K2CrO4, 0.15; NaF, 0.1; NiSO4,6H2O, 0.1; H2BO3, O.1; CoSO4,7H2O, 0.05; KIO3, 0.04; (NH4)6Mo7O24,4H2O, 0.02; LiCl, 0.015; Na2SeO3, 0.015; NH4VO3, 0.01.
: composition (g/kg): sucrose, 549.45; retinyl acetate, 1; cholecalciferol, 0.25; DL-α-tocopheryl acetate, 20; phylloquinone, 0.1; thiamin HCl, 1; riboflavin, 1; nicotinic acid, 5; calcium pantothenate, 2.5; pyridoxine HCl, 1; biotin, 1; folic acid, 0.2; cyanobalamin, 2.5; choline HCl, 200; DL-methionin, 200; p-aminobenzoic acid, 5; inositol, 10.
Fatty acid composition of the dietary lipids.
| Diet | Control | LCω3 | ||
| % wt of total fatty acids | g/kg diet | % wt of total fatty acids | g/kg diet | |
| 16:0 | 22.6 | 11.3 | 20.0 | 10.0 |
| 18:0 | 3.3 | 1.65 | 3.9 | 1.95 |
| other saturated FAs | 1.8 | 0.9 | 6.6 | 3.3 |
| total saturated FAs | 27.7 | 13.85 | 30.5 | 15.25 |
| 18:1ω9 | 57.9 | 28.95 | 22.6 | 11.3 |
| 18:1ω7 | 1.5 | 0.75 | 4.9 | 2.45 |
| other monounsaturated FAs | 0.6 | 0.3 | 6.7 | 3.35 |
| total monounsaturated FAs | 60.0 | 30.0 | 34.2 | 17.1 |
| 18:2 ω6 (LA) | 10.7 | 5.35 | 15.2 | 7.6 |
| 18:3 ω3 (ALA) | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.45 |
| 20:5 ω3 (EPA) | n.d. | n.d. | 10.9 | 5.45 |
| 22:5 ω3 (DPA) | n.d. | n.d. | 1.1 | 0.55 |
| 22:6 ω3 (DHA) | n.d. | n.d. | 7.2 | 3.6 |
| Total ω3 PUFAs | 1.6 | 0.8 | 20.1 | 10.05 |
| total PUFAs | 12.3 | 6.15 | 35.3 | 17.65 |
| ω6/ω3 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
FAs, fatty acids; LA, linoleic acid; ALA, α-linolenic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid, PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Brain fatty acid composition.
| Young | Aged | Statistical effects | |||||
| Control dietn = 4 | LCω3 dietn = 4 | Control dietn = 4 | LCω3 dietn = 4 | Diet effect | Age effect | Diet x Age | |
| % of total fatty acids | |||||||
| 16:0 | 14.3±0.28 | 19.5±0.35 | 14.0±0.80 | 18.6±0.20 | <0.001 | <0.05 | NS |
| 18:0 | 16.8±0.51 | 18.1±0.17 | 16.9±0.54 | 17.0±0.69 | <0.05 | NS | NS |
| Total saturated fatty acids | 34.8±0.73 | 39.0±0.50 | 33.8±0.78 | 36.9±0.53 | <0.001 | <0.01 | NS |
| 16:1 ω7 | 0.5±0.01 | 0.6±0.02 | 0.5±0.05 | 0.7±0.06 | <0.001 | <0.05 | NS |
| 18:1 ω9 | 20.2±0.59 | 17.8±0.27 | 21.7±0.30 | 19.1±0.36 | <0.001 | <0.001 | NS |
| 18:1 ω7 | 4.5±0.03 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.8±0.04 | 3.4±0.02 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Total monounsaturated fatty acids | 34.1±0.93 | 25.3±0.45 | 34.5±1.72 | 27.1±0.43 | <0.001 | NS | NS |
| 18:2 ω6 | 0.4±0.04 | 0.2±0.00 | 0.4±0.03 | 0.3±0.01 | <0.001 | NS | <0.01 |
| 20:2 ω6 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.1±0.00 | 0.1±0.01 | 0.05±0.01 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 20:3 ω6 (dGLA) | 0.5±0.02 | 0.4±0.01 | 0.4±0.02 | 0.3±0.02 | <0.001 | <0.001 | NS |
| 20:4 ω6 (AA) | 5.5±0.24 | 5.8±0.16 | 6.2±0.32 | 6.6±0.23 | <0.05 | <0.001 | NS |
| 22:4 ω6 | 2.3±0.03 | 1.3±0.03 | 2.2±0.04 | 1.7±0.13 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 22:5 ω6 | 0.1±0.02 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.1±0.01 | 0.1±0.02 | <0.01 | <0.001 | NS |
| Total ω6 fatty acids | 9.2±0.29 | 8.0±0.18 | 9.5±0.36 | 9.2±0.35 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.05 |
| 20:5 ω3 (EPA) | 0.1±0.01 | 0.4±0.01 | 0.05±0.01 | 0.2±0.04 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 22:5 ω3 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.6±0.03 | 0.2+0.02 | 0.4±0.05 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 22:6 ω3 (DHA) | 9.2±0.65 | 15.9±0.34 | 8.7±0.87 | 13.7±0.46 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.05 |
| Total ω3fatty acids | 9.5±0.66 | 16.9±0.36 | 8.9±0.89 | 14.3±0.53 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.05 |
| Total ω6+ω3 fatty acids | 18.6±0.94 | 24.9±0.38 | 18.4±1.22 | 23.5±0.53 | <0.001 | NS | NS |
| Total DMA | 12.5±0.73 | 10.7±0.18 | 13.3±0.31 | 12.4±0.70 | <0.001 | <0.001 | NS |
| ω6/ω3 | 0.97±0.04 | 0.48±0.02 | 1.07±0.07 | 0.64±0.04 | <0.001 | <0.001 | NS |
| LC ω6/LC ω3 | 0.9±0.04 | 0.5±0.02 | 1.0±0.07 | 0.6±0.04 | <0.001 | <0.01 | NS |
| AA/dGLA | 11.6±0.84 | 14.2±0.68 | 17.1±1.33 | 20.5±1.65 | <0.001 | <0.001 | NS |
| (dGLA+EPA)/AA | 0.10±0.01 | 0.14±0.01 | 0.07±0.00 | 0.09±0.01 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.01 |
dGLA: dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (20:3 ω6); AA: arachidonic acid (20:4 ω6); EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5 ω3); DHA: docosahexaenoic acid; DMA: dimethyl acetal; LC ω6: long chain ω6 (20:2 ω6+20:3 ω6+20:4 ω6+22:4 ω6+22:5 ω6); LC ω3: long chain ω3 (20:5 ω3+22:5 ω3+22:6 ω3); NS: not significant.
p<0.001 as compared to aged control diet;
p<0.01 as compared to aged control diet;
p<0.05 as compared to aged control diet.
Figure 1Spatial and object recognition memory.
(A) Time spent (in sec) in the novel or the familiar arm after a 5-min ITI in 3-month-old (young) and 22-month-old (aged) mice fed with the control diet or the LCω3 diet for 2 months. (B) Time spent (in sec) in the novel or the familiar object after a 1-hr ITI in 3-month-old (young) and 22-month-old (aged) mice fed with the control diet or the LCω3 diet for 2 months. *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05.
Figure 2c-Fos expression in the DG, CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus.
c-Fos immunohistochemical analysis was performed in the hippocampus of 3-month-old (young) and 22-month-old (aged) mice fed with the control diet or the LCω3 diet for 2 months and sacrificed 90 min after the spatial recognition acquisition session. (A) Representative images of c-Fos immunohistochemistry in the DG (left panel), the CA1 (central panel) and the CA3 region (right panel) of the hippocampus. Scale bar = 100 µm. (B) Quantification of c-Fos-positive cells was performed in the DG, the CA1 and the CA3 regions of the hippocampus. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ** p<0.01. (C) Correlation between the number of c-Fos positive cells induced by the Y-maze task in the DG (left panel), the CA1 (central panel) and the CA3 (right panel) and the spatial recognition score. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and corresponding significance (p) are displayed within each correlation window. The number of c-Fos positive cells in the DG and CA1, but not in the CA3 regions of the hippocampus was positively correlated to the spatial recognition score.
Figure 3Cytokine expression in the hippocampus and in plasma.
(A) CD11b, GFAP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFα mRNA expression was measured by real-time PCR in the hippocampus of 3-month-old (young) and 22-month-old (aged) mice fed with the control diet or the LCω3 diet for 2 months. Data are presented as mean relative fold change ± SEM. *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05. (B) IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFα were measured by using a multiplex cytokines assays in the plasma. Data are presented as mean ± SEM in pg/ml. * p<0.05.
Figure 4Morphometry of astrocytic processes in the hippocampus.
(A) Confocal analysis of GFAP immunofluorescence was performed in the DG, the CA1 and the CA3 regions of the hippocampus of 3-month old (young) and 22-month old (aged) mice fed with the control diet or the LCω3 diet for 2 months using a 63X oil-immersion lens with a 3.10X zoom and IMARIS software. Images are representative of GFAP 3D immunofluorescence in the DG (upper panel), CA1 (central panel) and CA3 (lower panel). Scale bar = 8.5 µm. (A) Morphometric analysis of astrocytes in the DG, CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus was performed using the “filament tracer” program/function. Data present means of primary and secondary processes lengths expressed in µm ± SEM. *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05.