Literature DB >> 22661513

Quantification of absolute coronary flow reserve and relative fractional flow reserve in a swine animal model using angiographic image data.

Zhang Zhang1, Shigeho Takarada, Sabee Molloi.   

Abstract

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) are important physiological indexes for coronary disease. The purpose of this study was to validate the CFR and FFR measurement techniques using only angiographic image data. Fifteen swine were instrumented with an ultrasound flow probe on the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Microspheres were gradually injected into the LAD to create microvascular disruption. An occluder was used to produce stenosis. Contrast material injections were made into the left coronary artery during image acquisition. Volumetric blood flow from the flow probe (Q(q)) was continuously recorded. Angiography-based blood flow (Q(a)) was calculated by using a time-density curve based on the first-pass analysis technique. Flow probe-based CFR (CFR(q)) and angiography-based CFR (CFR(a)) were calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline flow using Q(q) and Q(a), respectively. Relative angiographic FFR (relative FFR(a)) was calculated as the ratio of the normalized Q(a) in LAD to the left circumflex artery (LC(X)) during hyperemia. Flow probe-based FFR (FFR(q)) was measured from the ratio of hyperemic flow with and without disease. CFR(a) showed a strong correlation with the gold standard CFR(q) (CFR(a) = 0.91 CFR(q) + 0.30; r = 0.90; P < 0.0001). Relative FFR(a) correlated linearly with FFR(q) (relative FFR(a) = 0.86 FFR(q) + 0.05; r = 0.90; P < 0.0001). The quantification of CFR and relative FFR(a) using angiographic image data was validated in a swine model. This angiographic technique can potentially be used for coronary physiological assessment during routine cardiac catheterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661513      PMCID: PMC3423159          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00153.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  46 in total

1.  Assessment of myocardial reperfusion by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary flow reserve after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [correction of angiography] in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  W Lepper; R Hoffmann; O Kamp; A Franke; C C de Cock; H P Kühl; G T Sieswerda; J v Dahl; U Janssens; P Voci; C A Visser; P Hanrath
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  X-ray densitometry for the measurement of regional myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  M Haude; G Caspari; D Baumgart; T Ehring; R Schulz; T Roth; L Koch; R Erbel; P Spiller; G Heusch
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.165

3.  Reduced coronary and inotropic reserves with coronary microembolization.

Authors:  Andreas Skyschally; Rainer Schulz; Raimund Erbel; Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Quantification of coronary artery lumen volume by digital angiography: in vivo validation.

Authors:  S Molloi; G S Kassab; Y Zhou
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Evaluation of the microcirculation in hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Harry A J Struijker-Boudier; Agabiti E Rosei; Patrick Bruneval; Paolo G Camici; Frank Christ; Daniel Henrion; Bernard I Lévy; Axel Pries; Jean-Luc Vanoverschelde
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ronaldo S L Lima; Denny D Watson; Allen R Goode; Mir S Siadaty; Michael Ragosta; George A Beller; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Relative coronary flow velocity reserve improves correlation with stress myocardial perfusion imaging in assessment of coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  Vassilis Voudris; Dimitrios Avramides; Maria Koutelou; John Malakos; Athanasios Manginas; Manolis Papadakis; Dennis V Cokkinos
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions.

Authors:  Maria Siebes; Bart-Jan Verhoeff; Martijn Meuwissen; Robbert J de Winter; Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Comparison of coronary thermodilution and Doppler velocity for assessing coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  William F Fearon; H M Omar Farouque; Leora B Balsam; Anthony D Caffarelli; David T Cooke; Robert C Robbins; Peter J Fitzgerald; Alan C Yeung; Paul G Yock
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Invasive assessment of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Fadi El-Ahdab; Michael Ragosta
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.872

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Guoxin Fan; Deqiu Zhu; Wanrong Ma; Changqing Yang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.318

2.  Noninvasive Measurement of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve: An Under-exploiting Newland.

Authors:  Guo-Xin Fan; Ruo-Shuang Han; Jia-Chen Luo; Bi-Sheng Huang; Tao Jiang; Ji-Kun Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Ultrasound-guided femoral approach for coronary angiography and interventions in the porcine model.

Authors:  Grigorios Tsigkas; Georgios Vasilagkos; Alexandros Tousis; Michail Theofanis; Anastasios Apostolos; Ioannis Spyridonidis; Leonidas Goudas; Georgios Karpetas; Athanasios Moulias; Christos S Katsouras; Panagiotis Kitrou; Virginia Mplani; Anargyros N Moulas; Dimitrios Karnabatidis; Periklis Davlouros
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Determination of culprit coronary artery branches using hemodynamic indices from angiographic images.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Jun Chen; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.316

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.