Literature DB >> 18371600

Invasive assessment of coronary flow reserve.

Fadi El-Ahdab1, Michael Ragosta.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18371600     DOI： 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   3.872


× No keyword cloud information.
  32 in total

1.  Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  G J Bech; B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; E D de Muinck; J C Hoorntje; J Escaned; P R Stella; E Boersma; J Bartunek; J J Koolen; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Fractional flow reserve: critical review of an important physiologic adjunct to angiography.

Authors:  Andrew H Bishop; Habib Samady
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve?

Authors:  Gianni Casella; Marcus Leibig; Thomas M Schiele; Reiner Schrepf; Victoria Seelig; Hans-Ulrich Stempfle; Petra Erdin; Johannes Rieber; Andreas König; Uwe Siebert; Volker Klauss
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes and moderate coronary lesions undergoing deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve assessment.

Authors:  Joshua J Fischer; Xin-Qun Wang; Habib Samady; Ian J Sarembock; Eric R Powers; Lawrence W Gimple; Michael Ragosta
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Hemodynamic rounds series II: Coronary hemodynamics for angioplasty and stenting after myocardial infarction: use of absolute, relative coronary velocity and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  M J Kern; S Puri; W R Craig; R G Bach; T J Donohue
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1998-10

6.  Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative flow velocity reserve.

Authors:  D Baumgart; M Haude; G Goerge; J Ge; S Vetter; N Dagres; G Heusch; R Erbel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-07-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity.

Authors:  K L Gould; R L Kirkeeide; M Buchi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Venu Jasti; Eugen Ivan; Venkata Yalamanchili; Nattawut Wongpraparut; Massoud A Leesar
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  High left ventricular mass index does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity.

Authors:  Adnan K Chhatriwalla; Michael Ragosta; Eric R Powers; Ian J Sarembock; Lawrence W Gimple; Joshua J Fischer; Kurt G Barringhaus; Christopher M Kramer; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.022

10.  False-negative myocardial scintigraphy in balanced three-vessel disease, revealed by coronary pressure measurement.

Authors:  Wilbert H Aarnoudse; Kees-Joost B M Botman; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Intervent       Date:  2003
View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantification of absolute coronary flow reserve and relative fractional flow reserve in a swine animal model using angiographic image data.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.733
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.