Literature DB >> 25288357

Determination of culprit coronary artery branches using hemodynamic indices from angiographic images.

Zhang Zhang1, Jun Chen, Shigeho Takarada, Sabee Molloi.   

Abstract

A recently reported angiographic technique for hemodynamic indices based on first-pass distribution analysis (FPA) could potentially be helpful for determining the culprit artery responsible for myocardial ischemia. The purpose of this study was to determinate the culprit coronary arterial branches based on coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) using only angiographic images. The study was performed in 14 anesthetized swine. Microspheres were injected into coronary arterial branches to create microvascular disruption. Stenosis was also created by inserting plastic tubings in LAD and LCX arterial branches. Adenosine was used to produce maximum hyperemia. Angiographic CFR (CFRa), relative angiographic CFR (rCFRa), and angiographic FFR (FFRa) were calculated by FPA. The diagnostic abilities of CFRa, rCFRa, and FFRa were compared in three models: (1) epicardial stenosis model (S), (2) microcirculation disruption model (M), and (3) combined(S + M) model by using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The mean differences between FFRa and the pressure-derived FFR (FFRp) measurements were -0.01 ± 0.21 in S model (N = 37) and 0.01 ± 0.18 in M model (N = 53). From 225 measurements in S model, the AUCs for CFRa and FFRa were 0.720 and 0.918, respectively. From 262 measurements in M model and 238 measurements in (S + M) model, the AUCs for CFRa, rCFRa, FFRa were 0.744, 0.715, 0.959 and 0.806, 0.738, 0.995, respectively. The hemodynamic indices of the small branches (down to ~0.7 mm) could be measured using only angiographic image data. The application of FFRa could potentially provide a useful method to assess the severity of disease in coronary arterial branches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25288357     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0521-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.316


  21 in total

1.  Quantification of coronary artery lumen volume by digital angiography: in vivo validation.

Authors:  S Molloi; G S Kassab; Y Zhou
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Quantification of absolute coronary flow reserve and relative fractional flow reserve in a swine animal model using angiographic image data.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Heterogeneous microinfarcts caused by coronary microemboli: evaluation with multidetector CT and MR imaging in a swine model.

Authors:  Marcus Carlsson; David Saloner; Alastair J Martin; Philip C Ursell; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A computer reconstruction of the entire coronary arterial tree based on detailed morphometric data.

Authors:  N Mittal; Y Zhou; S Ung; C Linares; S Molloi; G S Kassab
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Optical coherence tomography criteria for defining functional severity of intermediate lesions: a comparative study with FFR.

Authors:  Tomasz Pawlowski; Francesco Prati; Tomasz Kulawik; Eleonora Ficarra; Jacek Bil; Robert Gil
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Coronary anatomy to predict physiology: fundamental limits.

Authors:  Nils P Johnson; Richard L Kirkeeide; K Lance Gould
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Fractional flow reserve assessment of left main stenosis in the presence of downstream coronary stenoses.

Authors:  Andy S C Yong; David Daniels; Bernard De Bruyne; Hyun-Sook Kim; Fumiaki Ikeno; Jennifer Lyons; Nico H J Pijls; William F Fearon
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 6.546

8.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  K L Gould; K Lipscomb; G W Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance.

Authors:  Zhiming Wu; Fei Ye; Wei You; Junjie Zhang; Dujiang Xie; Shaoliang Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions.

Authors:  Maria Siebes; Bart-Jan Verhoeff; Martijn Meuwissen; Robbert J de Winter; Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2015 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.