Literature DB >> 22660988

Ethical decision making in the conduct of research: role of individual, contextual and organizational factors. Commentary on "Science, human nature, and a new paradigm for ethics education".

Philip J Langlais1.   

Abstract

Despite the importance of scientific integrity to the well-being of society, recent findings suggest that training and mentoring in the responsible conduct of research are not very reliable or effective inhibitors of research misbehavior. Understanding how and why individual scientists decide to behave in ways that conform to or violate norms and standards of research is essential to the development of more effective training programs and the creation of more supportive environments. Scholars in business management, psychology, and other disciplines have identified many important factors that affect ethical behavior, including individual, contextual, and organizational factors. Surprisingly little research has been conducted to examine the role of these factors in either the development of ethical decision-making skills, or their applicability to ethical issues commonly encountered in research and other scholarly and professional activities. Interdisciplinary approaches combined with research and discipline relevant paradigms should greatly enhance understanding of the individual contextual and organizational factors involved in ethical and unethical research conduct. Such studies will inform and facilitate the development of more effective ethics education programs in the sciences and engineering professions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22660988     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9371-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  13 in total

1.  Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: a survey of graduate students in experimental sciences.

Authors:  Sarah Brown; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Beyond "compliance": the role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity.

Authors:  Gail Geller; Alison Boyce; Daniel E Ford; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas H Steneck
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; A Lauren Crain; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Moral awareness and ethical predispositions: investigating the role of individual differences in the recognition of moral issues.

Authors:  Scott J Reynolds
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-01

7.  Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Aaron S Horn; Kelly R Risbey; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Ethical conflict associated with managed care: views of nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Karen L Soeken; Nancy Miller
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Science, human nature, and a new paradigm for ethics education.

Authors:  Marc Lampe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  2 in total

1.  Editors' overview: Neuroethics: many voices and many stories.

Authors:  Michael Kalichman; Dena Plemmons; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  The Culture of Biosafety, Biosecurity, and Responsible Conduct in the Life Sciences: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Dana Perkins; Kathleen Danskin; A Elise Rowe; Alicia A Livinski
Journal:  Appl Biosaf       Date:  2019-03-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.