Literature DB >> 22711449

Science, human nature, and a new paradigm for ethics education.

Marc Lampe1.   

Abstract

For centuries, religion and philosophy have been the primary basis for efforts to guide humans to be more ethical. However, training in ethics and religion and imparting positive values and morality tests such as those emanating from the categorical imperative and the Golden Rule have not been enough to protect humankind from its bad behaviors. To improve ethics education educators must better understand aspects of human nature such as those that lead to "self-deception" and "personal bias." Through rationalizations, faulty reasoning and hidden bias, individuals trick themselves into believing there is little wrong with their own unethical behavior. The application of science to human nature offers the possibility of improving ethics education through better self-knowledge. The author recommends a new paradigm for ethics education in contemporary modern society. This includes the creation of a new field called "applied evolutionary neuro-ethics" which integrates science and social sciences to improve ethics education. The paradigm can merge traditional thinking about ethics from religious and philosophical perspectives with new ideas from applied evolutionary neuro-ethics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22711449     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9373-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  10 in total

1.  An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.

Authors:  J D Greene; R B Sommerville; L E Nystrom; J M Darley; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

Authors:  J Haidt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  How (un) ethical are you?

Authors:  Mahzarin R Banaji; Max H Bazerman; Dolly Chugh
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE.

Authors:  S MILGRAM
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1963-10

5.  A unifying view of the basis of social cognition.

Authors:  Vittorio Gallese; Christian Keysers; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Leigh E Nystrom; Andrew D Engell; John M Darley; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  The mirror neuron system and its function in humans.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  2005-12

8.  Mirrors of the mind.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti; Leonardo Fogassi; Vittorio Gallese
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.142

9.  The evolution and psychology of self-deception.

Authors:  William von Hippel; Robert Trivers
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 12.579

10.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.

Authors:  V Gallese; A Goldman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Ethical decision making in the conduct of research: role of individual, contextual and organizational factors. Commentary on "Science, human nature, and a new paradigm for ethics education".

Authors:  Philip J Langlais
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Active learning in a neuroethics course positively impacts moral judgment development in undergraduates.

Authors:  Desiree Abu-Odeh; Derek Dziobek; Nathalia Torres Jimenez; Christopher Barbey; Janet M Dubinsky
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Potential for bias in the context of neuroethics. Commentary on "Neuroscience, neuropolitics and neuroethics: the complex case of crime, deception and fMRI".

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Editors' overview: Neuroethics: many voices and many stories.

Authors:  Michael Kalichman; Dena Plemmons; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Coping with the Conflict-of-Interest Pandemic by Listening to and Doubting Everyone, Including Yourself.

Authors:  Lynn T Kozlowski
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.525

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.