Literature DB >> 16810337

Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors.

Brian C Martinson1, Melissa S Anderson, A Lauren Crain, Raymond de Vries.   

Abstract

Policymakers concerned about maintaining the integrity of science have recently expanded their attention from a focus on misbehaving individuals to characteristics of the environments in which scientists work. Little empirical evidence exists about the role of organizational justice in promoting or hindering scientific integrity. Our findings indicate that when scientists believe they are being treated unfairly they are more likely to behave in ways that compromise the integrity of science. Perceived violations of distributive and procedural justice were positively associated with self-reports of misbehavior among scientists.

Year:  2006        PMID: 16810337      PMCID: PMC1483900          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  20 in total

1.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.

Authors:  J A Colquitt; D E Conlon; M J Wesson; C O Porter; K Y Ng
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2001-06

2.  Careers. Competition and careers in biosciences.

Authors:  R Freeman; E Weinstein; E Marincola; J Rosenbaum; F Solomon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Critical issues in PhD training for biomedical scientists.

Authors:  R L Juliano; G S Oxford
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Trends in the social psychological study of justice.

Authors:  Linda J Skitka; Faye J Crosby
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2003

5.  Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science.

Authors:  H Etzkowitz
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  1983 Summer-Autumn

6.  Supply without demand.

Authors:  Donald Kennedy; Jim Austin; Kirstie Urquhart; Crispin Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.

Authors:  R K Merton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.

Authors:  J Siegrist
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  1996-01

10.  High effort, low reward, and cardiovascular risk factors in employed Swedish men and women: baseline results from the WOLF Study.

Authors:  R Peter; L Alfredsson; N Hammar; J Siegrist; T Theorell; P Westerholm
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  50 in total

1.  Ethical decision making in the conduct of research: role of individual, contextual and organizational factors. Commentary on "Science, human nature, and a new paradigm for ethics education".

Authors:  Philip J Langlais
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Research integrity and everyday practice of science.

Authors:  Frederick Grinnell
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.

Authors:  Raymond de Vries; Melissa S Anderson; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Fraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. Institutional changes, rather than individual motivations, encourage misconduct.

Authors:  Martina Franzen; Simone Rödder; Peter Weingart
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.

Authors:  Melissa S Anderson; Emily A Ronning; Raymond De Vries; Brian C Martinson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  The academic birth rate. Production and reproduction of the research work force, and its effect on innovation and research misconduct.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC).

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Carol R Thrush; A Lauren Crain
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices.

Authors:  A Lauren Crain; Brian C Martinson; Carol R Thrush
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Individual and organizational predictors of the ethicality of graduate students' responses to research integrity issues.

Authors:  Philip J Langlais; Blake J Bent
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Environmental Factors Contributing to Wrongdoing in Medicine: A Criterion-Based Review of Studies and Cases.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Kelly Carroll; Tyler Gibb; Elena Kraus; Timothy Rubbelke; Meghan Vasher; Emily E Anderson
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2011-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.