Literature DB >> 22660971

Early migration of the cemented tibial component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiostereometry study.

Andrea Ensini1, Paolo Barbadoro, Alberto Leardini, Fabio Catani, Sandro Giannini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has good clinical results but high revision rates. A unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design features an all-polyethylene and conforming tibial component, and we hypothesized that this may put at risk its fixation. Implant-to-bone micromotion was measured together with relevant clinical outcomes.
METHODS: The migration of the tibial component in twenty patients was measured at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, using standard radiostereometry, along with the relevant clinical outcomes using the IKS scoring system.
RESULTS: The eighteen arthroplasties at 24 months were found successful, with very good functional (mean 87.7; SD 15.4) and knee scores (mean 94.8; SD 10.1). The means and the standard deviations of the maximum total point motion (MTPM) for the four follow-ups were, respectively, as small as 0.4 ± 0.1 mm, 0.6 ± 0.2 mm, 0.6 ± 0.3 mm and 0.7 ± 0.3 mm, an average over all patients but one. In this knee, these were 1.6, 2.1, 2.4 and 2.2 mm, therefore not at high risk of aseptic loosening according to the literature. Only one knee was found at this risk, having the MTPM from 12 to 24 months of 0.5 mm, and the component moving and sinking medially, and rising laterally.
CONCLUSION: At 2-year follow-up, a successful implant-to-bone fixation can be achieved in conforming all-polyethylene cemented tibial component together with excellent clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22660971     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2068-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  The precision of radiostereometric measurements. Manual vs. digital measurements.

Authors:  Niclas Börlin; Truike Thien; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system.

Authors:  G Selvik
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

3.  The influence of metal backing in unicompartmental tibial component fixation. An in vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of micromotion.

Authors:  L Ryd; A Lindstrand; A Stenström; G Selvik
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement.

Authors:  O Furnes; B Espehaug; S A Lie; S E Vollset; L B Engesaeter; L I Havelin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Early failure of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design with an all-polyethylene tibial component.

Authors:  Cesar L Saenz; Mike S McGrath; David R Marker; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; Peter M Bonutti
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

7.  Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses.

Authors:  O Robertsson; L Borgquist; K Knutson; S Lewold; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-04

8.  Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Early migration characteristics of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem: an RSA study.

Authors:  David Campbell; Graham Mercer; Kjell G Nilsson; Vanessa Wells; John R Field; Stuart A Callary
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship.

Authors:  C E Ackroyd; S L Whitehouse; J H Newman; C C Joslin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis: an effective tool to predict implant survival after an all-poly unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-a 10 year follow-up study.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Laura Bragonzoni; Michele Gagliardi; Marco Bontempi; Ibrahim Akkawi; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Francesco Iacono; Silvio Patella; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Low implant migration of the SIGMA® medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daan Koppens; Maiken Stilling; Stig Munk; Jesper Dalsgaard; Søren Rytter; Ole Gade Sørensen; Torben Bæk Hansen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Tibial component alignment and risk of loosening in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiographic and radiostereometric study.

Authors:  P Barbadoro; A Ensini; A Leardini; M d'Amato; A Feliciangeli; A Timoncini; F Amadei; C Belvedere; S Giannini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Kinematic alignment of medial UKA is safe: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charles Rivière; Sivan Sivaloganathan; Loic Villet; Philippe Cartier; Sébastien Lustig; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.