Literature DB >> 20660240

Contact stress at the anterior aspect of the tibial post in posterior-stabilized total knee replacement.

Satoshi Hamai1, Hiromasa Miura, Shuichi Matsuda, Takeshi Shimoto, Hidehiko Higaki, Yukihide Iwamoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retrieval studies have demonstrated polyethylene wear and deformation of the anterior aspect of the tibial post of posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. We are not aware of any study that has analyzed the effects of the design of the femoral notch and the anterior aspect of the tibial post of posterior-stabilized total knee replacements on contact area, stress, and location. The purpose of the present study was to determine the levels of contact stress generated in three posterior-stabilized total knee replacement designs when the femoral intercondylar notch impinges on the anterior aspect of the tibial post.
METHODS: The contact area, mean and peak contact stresses, and contact location at the anterior aspect of the tibial post were determined when a posterior force of 100 N was applied to a NexGen LPS Flex, Genesis II, and Scorpio NRG total knee replacement. Measurements were performed at -15 degrees, -10 degrees, -5 degrees, 0 degrees, and 5 degrees of flexion of the femoral component both in neutral and with 5 degrees of rotation of the tibial component. Each measurement was sequentially performed five times, and the data were compared within and between the designs with use of analysis of variance and a post-hoc Scheffé F test.
RESULTS: The NexGen LPS Flex exhibited two contact areas on the medial and lateral corners of the anterior aspect of the post, whereas both the Genesis II and Scorpio NRG exhibited a single horizontal band. The NexGen LPS Flex showed the largest total contact area of the three designs at -15 degrees, -10 degrees, and 5 degrees of flexion. The NexGen LPS showed the lowest mean contact stress at -15 degrees and 5 degrees but showed the highest peak contact stress at -5 degrees and 0 degrees. The Scorpio NRG showed the highest mean contact stress under all conditions and showed the highest peak contact stress at -15 degrees, -10 degrees, and 5 degrees. With 5 degrees of rotation of the tibial component, peak contact stress increased, relative to neutral, 1.2 to twofold (depending on the flexion angle) in the Genesis II design.
CONCLUSIONS: The mean and peak contact stresses were variable for all three designs and the test conditions, approaching and in some cases exceeding the compressive yield stress for polyethylene. The geometry of the metal femoral notch and polyethylene tibial post in the axial and sagittal planes significantly affected contact area, mean and peak stresses, and contact location at the anterior aspect of the tibial post.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660240     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  The 2012 Mark Coventry award: a retrieval analysis of high flexion versus posterior-stabilized tibial inserts.

Authors:  Nicholas R Paterson; Matthew G Teeter; Steven J MacDonald; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D R Naudie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The effect of posterior tibial slope on knee flexion in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xiaojun Shi; Bin Shen; Pengde Kang; Jing Yang; Zongke Zhou; Fuxing Pei
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Importance of the tibial slope in knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Silvan Wittenberg; Ufuk Sentuerk; Lisa Renner; Claude Weynandt; Carsten F Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Post-cam mechanics and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic in vitro analysis of eight posterior-stabilized total knee designs.

Authors:  N Arnout; L Vanlommel; J Vanlommel; J P Luyckx; L Labey; B Innocenti; J Victor; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  In vivo kinematics of gait in posterior-stabilized and bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasties using image-matching techniques.

Authors:  Koji Murakami; Satoshi Hamai; Ken Okazaki; Yifeng Wang; Satoru Ikebe; Hidehiko Higaki; Takeshi Shimoto; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Yukio Akasaki; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Nontraumatic tibial polyethylene insert cone fracture in mobile-bearing posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yohei Tanikake; Koji Hayashi; Munehiro Ogawa; Yusuke Inagaki; Kenji Kawate; Tetsuya Tomita; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-09-15

7.  Effect of Post-Cam Design for Normal Knee Joint Kinematic, Ligament, and Quadriceps Force in Patient-Specific Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty by Using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Sae Kwang Kwon; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The biomechanical effect of different posterior tibial slopes on the tibiofemoral joint after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yingpeng Wang; Songhua Yan; Jizhou Zeng; Kuan Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Notching is less, if femoral component sagittal positioning is planned perpendicular to distal femur anterior cortex axis, in navigated TKA.

Authors:  Raj Kanna; Chandramohan Ravichandran; Gautam M Shetty
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.