| Literature DB >> 22649329 |
R Mohanraj1, S Dhanakumar, G Solaraj.
Abstract
Coimbatore is one of the fast growing industrial cities of Southern India with an urban population of 1.9 million. This study attempts to evaluate the trends of airborne fine particulates (PM 2.5) and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) on them. The PM 2.5 mass was collected in polytetra fluoroethylene filters using fine particulate sampler at monthly intervals during March 2009 to February 2010. PAHs were extracted from PM 2.5 and estimated by high-performance liquid chromatography. It is alarming to note that PM 2.5 values ranged between 27.85 and 165.75 μg/m(3) and exceeded the air quality standards in many sampling events. The sum of 9 PAHs bound to PM 2.5 in a single sampling event ranged from 4.1 to 1632.3 ng/m(3). PAH diagnostic ratios and principal component analysis results revealed vehicular emissions and diesel-powered generators as predominant sources of PAH in Coimbatore.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22649329 PMCID: PMC3350969 DOI: 10.1100/2012/980843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Map showing study sites in Coimbatore.
Meteorological conditions in Coimbatore during the study period1.
| Month | Temp. (°C) | Humidity (%) | Wind speed (km/h) | Rainfall (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March | 28 ± 1 | 52 ± 8 | 7 ± 2 | 0 |
| April | 29 ± 1 | 57 ± 10 | 9 ± 2 | 0 |
| May | 28 ± 1 | 69 ± 6 | 11 ± 3 | 3 ± 8 |
| June | 27 ± 1 | 70 ± 7 | 15 ± 1 | 0 |
| July | 26 ± 1 | 77 ± 6 | 16 ± 4 | 1 ± 2 |
| August | 26 ± 1 | 74 ± 5 | 14 ± 4 | 2 ± 7 |
| September | 26 ± 1 | 75 ± 5 | 13 ± 3 | 2 ± 7 |
| October | 27 ± 1 | 67 ± 10 | 8 ± 5 | 2 ± 6 |
| November | 25 ± 1 | 78 ± 8 | 6 ± 2 | 8 ± 17 |
| December | 25 ± 1 | 70 ± 6 | 7 ± 2 | 0 |
| January | 25 ± 1 | 59 ± 6 | 7 ± 2 | 0 |
| February | 27 ± 2 | 51 ± 6 | 6 ± 1 | 0 |
1Source: India Meteorological Department (IMD), New Delhi.
Figure 2PM 2.5 trends in Coimbatore.
Descriptive statistics for PAH concentrations in Coimbatore city.
| Descriptive statistics | Concentration of PAHs in ng/m3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHENAN | ANTH | BaA | CHRY | BbF | BkFi | BaP | BghiP | IcdP | TPAHs | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Minimum | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | 0.1 | BDL | BDL | 4.2 |
| Maximum | 17.4 | 88.3 | 292.7 | 113.4 | 75.5 | 10.4 | 18.7 | 73.3 | 18.6 | 619.1 |
| Mean | 5.5 | 25.4 | 40.1 | 27.2 | 15.2 | 2.1 | 6.1 | 17.4 | 4.5 | 143.5 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Minimum | 15.9 | BDL | BDL | BDL | 3.6 | BDL | BDL | 4.9 | 10.9 | 119.4 |
| Maximum | 81.9 | 40.2 | 177 | 195.2 | 48.4 | 14.4 | 21.2 | 59.1 | 30 | 419.2 |
| Mean | 38.8 | 4.5 | 30.8 | 103.4 | 33.2 | 6.5 | 11.8 | 26.6 | 20.4 | 276.0 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Minimum | BDL | BDL | BDL | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | BDL | 0.1 | 0.1 | 4.1 |
| Maximum | 157.7 | 85.0 | 142.2 | 312.0 | 157.7 | 40.2 | 20.2 | 56.5 | 84.2 | 744.3 |
| Mean | 27.3 | 12.9 | 40.3 | 73.0 | 30.0 | 7.7 | 5.7 | 16.1 | 15.2 | 233.2 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Minimum | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | 23.7 |
| Maximum | 80.4 | 278.7 | 225.0 | 805.1 | 43.5 | 66.3 | 40.7 | 98.8 | 218.8 | 1632.3 |
| Mean | 17.4 | 43.5 | 41.9 | 277.5 | 16.3 | 12.5 | 10.4 | 30.5 | 36.4 | 486.4 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Minimum | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | BDL | 6.7 | BDL | 13.7 |
| Maximum | 35.5 | 55.6 | 28.5 | 196.8 | 18.4 | 8.0 | 16.3 | 37.1 | 41.5 | 325.6 |
| Mean | 12.1 | 20.7 | 8.0 | 81.4 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 9.1 | 21.0 | 15.2 | 175.0 |
|
| ||||||||||
| LOD ( | 0.0042 | 0.0014 | 0.0060 | 0.0068 | 0.0056 | 0.0072 | 0.0095 | 0.0088 | 0.0065 | — |
*BDL below detectable level.
Comparison of total PAHs (ng/m3) in various cities of the India.
| S. No | Total PAHs | Range | City | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 150–1800 | Delhi | [ |
| 2 |
| 244–1481 | Chennai | [ |
| 3 |
| 197–2397 | Kanpur | [ |
| 4 |
| 284–2114 | Kolkata | [ |
| 5 |
| 177–1201 | Delhi | [ |
| 5 |
| 326–791 | Chennai | [ |
| 6 |
| 4.1–1632 | Coimbatore | The present study |
Correlation between meteorological parameters and PAH.
| PM 2.5 | Temp | Humidity | Wind speed | Rainfall | PHENAN | ANTH | BaA | CHRY | BbF | BkF | BaP | BghiP | IcdP | TPAHs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM 2.5 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||
| Temp | −.57 | 1.0 | |||||||||||||
| Humidity | −.15 | .35 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
| Wind speed | −.69* | .46 | .53 | 1.0 | |||||||||||
| Rainfall | .25 | .47 | .25 | −.38 | 1.0 | ||||||||||
| PHENAN | −.10 | .06 | −.24 | −.19 | −.03 | 1.0 | |||||||||
| ANTH | .39 | −.43 | −.70* | −.55 | −.26 | .15 | 1.0 | ||||||||
| BaA | .37 | −.60 | −.43 | −.19 | −.57 | .17 | .71* | 1.0 | |||||||
| CHRY | .13 | .14 | −.44 | −.24 | .13 | .78* | .13 | .20 | 1.0 | ||||||
| BbF | .48 | −.57 | −.14 | −.47 | −.16 | .68* | .23 | .53 | .43 | 1.0 | |||||
| BkF | .17 | −.15 | −.37 | −.33 | −.09 | .93** | .09 | .27 | .83** | .77* | 1.0 | ||||
| BaP | .72* | −.49 | −.53 | −.72* | .16 | .40 | .46 | .57 | .58 | .67* | .57 | 1.0 | |||
| BghiP | .63 | −.72* | −.17 | −.34 | −.27 | −.03 | .14 | .20 | .07 | .43 | .27 | .30 | 1.0 | ||
| IcdP | .37 | −.37 | −.26 | −.35 | −.14 | .83** | .13 | .43 | .75* | .90** | .93** | .67* | .43 | 1.0 | |
| TPAHs | .20 | −.33 | −.46 | −.29 | −.27 | .82** | .35 | .57 | .80** | .77* | .87** | .62 | .30 | .92** | 1.0 |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Site-specific diagnostic ratio of PAHs and their probable sources.
| Sampling stations | BaP/ | BbF/ | BaP/ | Ind/ | Ind/ | BaA/ | BghiP/ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIDCO | 0.52 | 2.98 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.53 | 2.99 |
| Lakshmi mills | 0.09 | 3.85 | 0.58 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 0.13 | 2.11 |
| Kuniyamuthur | 0.07 | 5.49 | 0.74 | 1.12 | 0.44 | 0.34 | 2.81 |
| Kaundampalayam | 0.05 | 1.67 | 1.60 | 1.99 | 0.66 | 0.24 | 1.16 |
| 100 feet road | 0.18 | 0.89 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.12 | 2.01 |
|
| |||||||
| Diesel vehicles | >0.73 [ | >0.5 [ | ~1.0 [ | 0.35–0.70 [ | 0.38–0.64 [ | 1.2–2.2 [ | |
| Industrial furnaces | 0.36–0.57 [ | 0.23–0.89 [ | 0.02–0.06 [ | ||||
| Catalyst-equipped cars | 0.21–0.22 [ | 0.22–0.55 [ | 2.5–3.3 [ | ||||
Figure 3Factor analysis for PAH concentration in Coimbatore city.