Literature DB >> 34991242

Occupational exposures to particulate matter and PM2.5-associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at the Agbogbloshie waste recycling site in Ghana.

Lawrencia Kwarteng1, Amila M Devasurendra2, Zoey Laskaris3, John Arko-Mensah1, Afua A Amoabeng Nti1, Sylvia Takyi1, Augustine A Acquah1, Duah Dwomoh4, Nil Basu5, Thomas Robins2, Julius N Fobil1, Stuart Batterman6.   

Abstract

Electronic waste (e-waste) disposal and recycling activities such as burning and smelting can emit particulate matter (PM), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and other pollutants that expose workers and nearby communities. At informal e-waste recycling facilities, both emission controls and protective measures for workers are absent. This study characterizes personal exposures (breathing zone) of PM and PAHs of e-waste workers at the large Agbogbloshie e-waste site in Accra, Ghana. We collected gravimetric and optical measurements of PM2.5 and PM10 using shift samples for workers and for an age- and gender-matched reference population. PM2.5 filters were analyzed for 26 PAHs using gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Among e-waste workers, PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations were 99 ± 56 and 218 ± 158 µg/m3 (median ± interquartile range, optical measurements), respectively; these levels were 78 and 57% higher, respectively, than levels measured at a fixed site that was centrally located at the waste site. In the reference community, breathing zone PM2.5 and PM10 levels were lower, 49 ± 20 and 131 ± 108 µg/m3, respectively, and the fraction of coarse PM was larger. We detected all 26 target PAHs, of which naphthalene and phenanthrene were the most abundant. PAH concentrations were weakly correlated to PM levels, but PAH abundances, representing the fraction of PAH mass to the total PM2.5 mass collected, were strongly and inversely correlated to PM levels, suggesting multiple and different sources of PAHs and PM that affected exposures. Both PM and PAH levels were elevated for workers performing burning and dismantling, and both exceeded standards or risk-based guidelines, e.g., lifetime excess cancer risks for several PAHs were in the 10-4 to 10-6 range, indicating the need to reduce emissions as well as provide respiratory protection. The study emphasizes the importance of using personal and shift samples to accurately characterize worker exposure.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Breathing zone; Occupational exposure; Personal sampling; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34991242      PMCID: PMC8745907          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  47 in total

1.  Derivation of Time-Activity Data Using Wearable Cameras and Measures of Personal Inhalation Exposure among Workers at an Informal Electronic-Waste Recovery Site in Ghana.

Authors:  Zoey Laskaris; Chad Milando; Stuart Batterman; Bhramar Mukherjee; Niladri Basu; Marie S O'neill; Thomas G Robins; Julius N Fobil
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Occurrence, profiles, and toxic equivalents of chlorinated and brominated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in E-waste open burning soils.

Authors:  Chiya Nishimura; Yuichi Horii; Shuhei Tanaka; Kwadwo Ansong Asante; Florencio Ballesteros; Pham Hung Viet; Takaaki Itai; Hidetaka Takigami; Shinsuke Tanabe; Takashi Fujimori
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Soil pollution at a major West African E-waste recycling site: Contamination pathways and implications for potential mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Claudia Moeckel; Knut Breivik; Therese Haugdahl Nøst; Alhaji Sankoh; Kevin C Jones; Andrew Sweetman
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Seasonal variations and source apportionment of complex polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures in particulate matter in an electronic waste and urban area in South China.

Authors:  She-Jun Chen; Jing Wang; Tao Wang; Ting Wang; Bi-Xian Mai; Staci L Massey Simonich
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Levels, potential sources and human health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in particulate matter (PM(10)) in Kumasi, Ghana.

Authors:  Nesta Bortey-Sam; Yoshinori Ikenaka; Osei Akoto; Shouta M M Nakayama; Yared Beyene Yohannes; Elvis Baidoo; Hazuki Mizukawa; Mayumi Ishizuka
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Assessment of benzo(a)pyrene-equivalent carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of residential indoor versus outdoor polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposing young children in New York City.

Authors:  Kyung Hwa Jung; Beizhan Yan; Steven N Chillrud; Frederica P Perera; Robin Whyatt; David Camann; Patrick L Kinney; Rachel L Miller
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Ambient PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Changhua County, central Taiwan: Seasonal variation, source apportionment and cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Chen; Hung-Che Chiang; Chin-Yu Hsu; Tzu-Ting Yang; Tzu-Yu Lin; Mu-Jean Chen; Nai-Tzu Chen; Yuh-Shen Wu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons bound to PM 2.5 in urban Coimbatore, India with emphasis on source apportionment.

Authors:  R Mohanraj; S Dhanakumar; G Solaraj
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-29

Review 9.  Health Effects of Ambient Air Pollution in Developing Countries.

Authors:  Pier Mannuccio Mannucci; Massimo Franchini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Toxicities of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons for Aquatic Animals.

Authors:  Masato Honda; Nobuo Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.