Literature DB >> 12775060

Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban atmosphere: a comparison of three methods.

Randolph K Larsen1, Joel E Baker.   

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous pollutants in urban atmospheres. Several PAHs are known carcinogens or are the precursors to carcinogenic daughter compounds. Understanding the contributions of the various emission sources is critical to appropriately managing PAH levels in the environment. The sources of PAHs to ambient air in Baltimore, MD, were determined by using three source apportionment methods, principal component analysis with multiple linear regression, UNMIX, and positive matrix factorization. Determining the source apportionment through multiple techniques mitigates weaknesses in individual methods and strengthens the overlapping conclusions. Overall source contributions compare well among methods. Vehicles, both diesel and gasoline, contribute on average 16-26%, coal 28-36%, oil 15-23%, and wood/other having the greatest disparity of 23-35% of the total (gas- plus particle-phase) PAHs. Seasonal trends were found for both coal and oil. Coal was the dominate PAH source during the summer while oil dominated during the winter. Positive matrix factorization was the only method to segregate diesel from gasoline sources. These methods indicate the number and relative strength of PAH sources to the ambient urban atmosphere. As with all source apportionment techniques, these methods require the user to objectively interpret the resulting source profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12775060     DOI: 10.1021/es0206184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  103 in total

1.  Source apportionment of PM(10) and PM(2.5) at multiple sites in the strait of Gibraltar by PMF: impact of shipping emissions.

Authors:  Marco Pandolfi; Yolanda Gonzalez-Castanedo; Andrés Alastuey; Jesus D de la Rosa; Enrique Mantilla; A Sanchez de la Campa; Xavier Querol; Jorge Pey; Fulvio Amato; Teresa Moreno
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contamination in surface soil of coal stockpile sites in South Kalimantan, Indonesia.

Authors:  Andy Mizwar; Bambang Joko Priatmadi; Chairul Abdi; Yulinah Trihadiningrum
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Distribution, transfer, and health risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil-wheat systems of Henan Province, a typical agriculture province of China.

Authors:  Jinglan Feng; Xiaoying Li; Jiahui Zhao; Jianhui Sun
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Distribution, source analysis, and ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the typical topsoil of the Issyk-Kul Lake Basin.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Long Ma; Jilili Abuduwaili; Yaoming Li
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Characterization of PM10 atmospheric aerosol at urban and urban background sites in Fuzhou city, China.

Authors:  Lingling Xu; Xiaoqiu Chen; Jinsheng Chen; Fuwang Zhang; Chi He; Ke Du; Yang Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Characterization of PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and its deposition in Populus tomentosa leaves in Beijing.

Authors:  Hailong An; Gang Zhang; Chao Liu; Huihong Guo; Weilun Yin; Xinli Xia
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  UNMIX modeling of ambient PM(2.5) near an interstate highway in Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Authors:  Shaohua Hu; Rafael McDonald; Dainius Martuzevicius; Pratim Biswas; Sergey A Grinshpun; Anna Kelley; Tiina Reponen; James Lockey; Grace Lemasters
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Combined effects of prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and material hardship on child IQ.

Authors:  Julia Vishnevetsky; Deliang Tang; Hsin-Wen Chang; Emily L Roen; Ya Wang; Virginia Rauh; Shuang Wang; Rachel L Miller; Julie Herbstman; Frederica P Perera
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.763

9.  Exposure to dust-bound PAHs and associated carcinogenic risk in primitive and traditional cooking practices in Pakistan.

Authors:  Atif Kamal; Riffat Naseem Malik; Tania Martellini; Alessandra Cincinelli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Characteristics and sources of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Xian Yu Wang; Qing Bo Li; Yong Ming Luo; Qian Ding; Lian Min Xi; Jian Min Ma; Yan Li; Yi Peng Liu; Cui Li Cheng
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.