Literature DB >> 12676603

Emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their carcinogenic potencies from cooking sources to the urban atmosphere.

Chun-The Li1, Yuan-Chung Lin, Wen-Jhy Lee, Perng-Jy Tsai.   

Abstract

Traffic has long been recognized as the major contributor to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) concentrations. However, this does not consider the contribution of cooking sources of PAHs. This study set out, first, to assess the characteristics of PAHs and their corresponding benzo[a]pyrene equivalent (B[a]Peq) emissions from cooking sources to the urban atmosphere. To illustrate the importance of cooking sources, PAH emissions from traffic sources were then calculated and compared. The entire study was conducted on a city located in southern Taiwan. PAH samples were collected from the exhaust stacks of four types of restaurant: Chinese, Western, fast food, and Japanese. For total PAHs, results show that the fractions of gaseous PAHs (range, 75.9-89.9%) were consistently higher than the fractions of particulate PAHs (range, 10.1-24.1%) in emissions from the four types of restaurant. But for total B[a]Peq, we found that the contributions of gaseous PAHs (range, 15.7-21.9%) were consistently lower than the contributions of particulate PAHs (range, 78.1-84.3%). For emission rates of both total PAHs and total B[a]Peq, a consistent trend was found for the four types of restaurant: Chinese (2,038 and 154 kg/year, respectively) > Western (258 and 20.4 kg/year, respectively) > fast food (31.4 and 0.104 kg/year, respectively) > Japanese (5.11 and 0.014 kg/year, respectively). By directly adapting the emission data obtained from Chinese restaurants, we found that emission rates on total PAHs and total B[a]Peq for home kitchen sources were 6,639 and 501 kg/year, respectively. By combining both restaurant sources and home kitchen sources, this study yielded emission rates of total PAHs and total B[a]Peq from cooking sources of the studied city of 8,973 and 675 kg/year, respectively. Compared with PAH emissions from traffic sources in the same city, we found that although the emission rates of total PAHs for cooking sources were significantly less than those for traffic sources (13,500 kg/year), the emission rates of total B[a]Peq for cooking sources were much higher than those for traffic sources (61.4 kg/year). The above results clearly indicate that although cooking sources are less important than traffic sources in contributing to total PAH emissions, PAH emissions from cooking sources might cause much more serious problems than traffic sources, from the perspective of carcinogenic potency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12676603      PMCID: PMC1241432          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.5518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  10 in total

Review 1.  Carcinogenic risk assessment of complex mixtures.

Authors:  D Krewski; T Thorslund; J Withey
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.273

2.  Risk factors associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  B E Henderson; E Louie; J SooHoo Jing; P Buell; M B Gardner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effect of the gasoline additives on PAH emission.

Authors:  H H Mi; W J Lee; S J Chen; T C Lin; T L Wu; J C Hu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Potential exposure of cooks to airborne mutagens and carcinogens.

Authors:  K Teschke; C Hertzman; C Van Netten; E Lee; B Morrison; A Cornista; G Lau; A Hundal
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Mutagenic activity of airborne particles inside and outside homes.

Authors:  J J van Houdt; W M Jongen; G M Alink; J S Boleij
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1984

6.  Effect of fuel aromatic content on PAH emission from a heavy-duty diesel engine.

Authors:  H H Mi; W J Lee; C B Chen; H H Yang; S J Wu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  The use of toxic equivalency factors in assessing occupational and environmental health risk associated with exposure to airborne mixtures of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  T Petry; P Schmid; C Schlatter
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Particle-bound PAH content in ambient air.

Authors:  H L Sheu; W J Lee; S J Lin; G C Fang; H C Chang; W C You
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  I C Nisbet; P K LaGoy
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  A survey of cancer and occupation in young and middle aged men. II. Non-respiratory cancers.

Authors:  D Coggon; B Pannett; C Osmond; E D Acheson
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1986-06
  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  Risk assessment of inhalation exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Taiwanese workers at night markets.

Authors:  Ping Zhao; Kuo-Pin Yu; Chi-Chi Lin
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Characterization and concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in emissions from different heating systems in Damascus, Syria.

Authors:  Farouk Alkurdi; François Karabet; Marwan Dimashki
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Comparative developmental toxicity of a comprehensive suite of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Mitra C Geier; Anna C Chlebowski; Lisa Truong; Staci L Massey Simonich; Kim A Anderson; Robert L Tanguay
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Characteristics of PAHs from deep-frying and frying cooking fumes.

Authors:  Zhiliang Yao; Jing Li; Bobo Wu; Xuewei Hao; Yong Yin; Xi Jiang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Human Health Risk Assessment of 16 Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soils of Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA.

Authors:  Erika Hussar; Sean Richards; Zhi-Qing Lin; Robert P Dixon; Kevin A Johnson
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  Dietary intake polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and associated cancer risk in a cohort of Chinese urban adults: Inter- and intra-individual variability.

Authors:  Xiaoli Duan; Guofeng Shen; Hongbiao Yang; Jing Tian; Fusheng Wei; Jicheng Gong; Junfeng Jim Zhang
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the urban air of Delhi during 2003.

Authors:  Homdutt Sharma; V K Jain; Zahid H Khan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Assessment of the bioaccessibility of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in topsoils from different urban functional areas using an in vitro gastrointestinal test.

Authors:  Min Lu; Dongxing Yuan; Qingmei Lin; Tong Ouyang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during pregnancy and risk of preterm birth.

Authors:  Amy M Padula; Elizabeth M Noth; S Katharine Hammond; Fred W Lurmann; Wei Yang; Ira B Tager; Gary M Shaw
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons bound to PM 2.5 in urban Coimbatore, India with emphasis on source apportionment.

Authors:  R Mohanraj; S Dhanakumar; G Solaraj
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.