Literature DB >> 11918004

Emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, toxicity, and mutagenicity from domestic cooking using sawdust briquettes, wood, and kerosene.

OanhNguyenThi Kim1, Le Hoang Nghiem, Yin Latt Phyu.   

Abstract

Smoke samples, in both gas and particulate matter (PM) phases, of the three domestic stoves were collected using U.S. EPA modified method 5 and were analyzed for 17 PAH (HPLC-UV), acute toxicity (Microtox test), and mutagenicity (Amestest). The gas phase of smoke contributed > or = 95% of 17 PAH, > or = 96% of toxicity, and > or = 60% of mutagenicity. The highest emission factor of 17 PAH was from sawdust briquettes (260 mg/kg), but the highest emission of 11 genotoxic PAH was from kerosene (28 mg/kg). PM samples of kerosene smoke were not toxic. The total toxicity emission factor was the highest from sawdust, followed by kerosene and wood fuel. Smoke samples from the kerosene stove were not mutagenic. TA98 indicated the presence of both direct and indirect mutagenic activities in PM samples of sawdust and wood fuel but only direct mutagenic activities in the gas phase. TA100 detected only direct mutagenic activities in both PM and gas-phase samples. The higher mutagenicity emission factor was from wood fuel, 12 x 10(6) revertants/kg (TA100-S9) and 3.5 x 10(6) (TA98-S9), and lower from sawdust, 2.9 x 10(6) (TA100-S9) and 2.8 x 10(6) (TA98-S9). The low burning rate and high efficiency of a kerosene stove have resulted in the lowest PAH, toxicity, and mutagenicity emissions from daily cooking activities. The bioassays produced toxicity and mutagenicity results in correspondence with the PAH content of samples. The tests could be used for a quick assessment of potential health risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11918004     DOI: 10.1021/es011060n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  19 in total

1.  Mutagenicity- and pollutant-emission factors of pellet-fueled gasifier cookstoves: Comparison with other combustion sources.

Authors:  Wyatt M Champion; Sarah H Warren; Ingeborg M Kooter; William Preston; Q Todd Krantz; David M DeMarini; James J Jetter
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  A multi-day environmental study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in a high-risk region for esophageal cancer in China.

Authors:  Nicole C Deziel; Wen-Qiang Wei; Christian C Abnet; You-Lin Qiao; Deirdre Sunderland; Jian-Song Ren; Michele M Schantz; Yu Zhang; Paul T Strickland; Salahaddin Abubaker; Sanford M Dawsey; Melissa C Friesen; Mark J Roth
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 3.  Kerosene: a review of household uses and their hazards in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Nicholas L Lam; Kirk R Smith; Alison Gauthier; Michael N Bates
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 6.393

4.  Mutagenicity assessment of aerosols in emissions from domestic combustion processes.

Authors:  Nuno Canha; Isabel Lopes; Estela Domingos Vicente; Ana M Vicente; Benjamin A Musa Bandowe; Susana Marta Almeida; Célia A Alves
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Personal and indoor exposure to PM₂.₅ and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the southern highlands of Tanzania: a pilot-scale study.

Authors:  Mari E Titcombe; Matt Simcik
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Emissions of parent, nitro, and oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from residential wood combustion in rural China.

Authors:  Guofeng Shen; Shu Tao; Siye Wei; Yanyan Zhang; Rong Wang; Bin Wang; Wei Li; Huizhong Shen; Ye Huang; Yuanchen Chen; Han Chen; Yifeng Yang; Wei Wang; Xilong Wang; Wenxin Liu; Staci L M Simonich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Biomonitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in pregnant women in Trujillo, Peru--comparison of different fuel types used for cooking.

Authors:  Olorunfemi Adetona; Zheng Li; Andreas Sjödin; Lovisa C Romanoff; Manuel Aguilar-Villalobos; Larry L Needham; Daniel B Hall; Brandon E Cassidy; Luke P Naeher
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Emissions of parent, nitrated, and oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from indoor corn straw burning in normal and controlled combustion conditions.

Authors:  Guofeng Shen; Miao Xue; Siye Wei; Yuanchen Chen; Bin Wang; Rong Wang; Yan Lv; Huizhong Shen; Wei Li; Yanyan Zhang; Ye Huang; Han Chen; Wen Wei; Qiuyue Zhao; Bing Li; Haisuo Wu; Shu Tao
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.565

Review 9.  Toxicity of atmospheric particle-bound PAHs: an environmental perspective.

Authors:  Sofia Raquel Mesquita; Barend L van Drooge; Carlos Barata; Natividade Vieira; Laura Guimarães; Benjamin Piña
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Fine Particulate Matter Emitted from Burning Kerosene, Liquid Petroleum Gas, and Wood Fuels in Household Cookstoves.

Authors:  Guofeng Shen; William Preston; Seth M Ebersviller; Craig Williams; Jerroll W Faircloth; James J Jetter; Michael D Hays
Journal:  Energy Fuels       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.