| Literature DB >> 22634843 |
Hawa Z E Jaafar1, Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim, Ehsan Karimi.
Abstract
A split plot 3 × 3 experiment was designed to examine the impact of three concentrations of CO₂ (400, 800 and 1,200 μmol·mol⁻¹) on the phenolic andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22634843 PMCID: PMC6268359 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17066331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Phenolics content (µg·g−1 dry weight) in three varieties of Labisia pumila grown under different CO2 concentration.
| CO2 levels (µmol·mol−1) | Varieties | Gallic acid * | Pyragallol | Caffeic acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 448.12 ± 2.44 d | 810.03 ± 2.44 | 47.83 ± 3.22 f | |
|
|
| 215.48 ± 4.32 g | ND | 43.92 ± 2.11 f |
|
| 406.03 ± 3.22 f | ND | 115.21 ± 1.14 e | |
|
| 837.434 ± 0.87 b | ND | 215.51 ± 2.54 c | |
|
|
| 282.17 ± 0.43 g | ND | 177.35 ± 2.56 d |
|
| 474.33 ± 3.67 c | ND | ND | |
|
| 948.28 ± 6.77 a | ND | 543.88 ± 3.44 a | |
|
|
| 435.69 ± 9.87 e | ND | 237.86 ± 5.66 b |
|
| 935.91 ± 4.34 a | ND | ND |
ND = not detected. All analyses are the mean of nine measurements ± standard error of mean. Results expressed in µg·g−1of dry plant material. Means not sharing a common letter were significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.*
Figure 1The RP-HPLC chromatogram of phenolics compounds in the leaves of Labisia pumila. Identification of compounds: gallic acid, pyrogallol and caffeic acid.
Percent of increase or decrease of phenolics compounds in three varieties of Labisia pumila grown under elevated CO2 concentration (800 and 1,200 µmol·mol−1).
| Phenolic compounds | Var.
| Var.
| Var.
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 800 (µmol·mol−1) | 1,200 (µmol·mol−1) | 800 (µmol·mol−1) | 1,200 (µmol·mol−1) | 800 (µmol·mol−1) | 1,200 (µmol·mol−1) | |
|
| +86% | +111% | +30% | +101% | +16.4% | +130% |
|
| −100% | −100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
| +338% | +1010% | +298% | +433% | −100% | −100% |
Results expressed in percent; + and − indicate respectively increase and decrease of component concentrations when exposed to CO2.
The concentrations of flavonoid compounds in three varieties of Labisia pumila grown under different CO2 concentration.
| CO2 levels (µmol·mol−1) | Varieties | Flavonoid content (µg·g−1 dry weight) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaempferol | Quercetin * | Myricetin | Rutin | Naringenin | ||
|
| 186.71 ± 0.34 b | 57.61 ± 1.22 g | 87.81 ± 0.34 c | ND | 139.20 ± 2.56 c | |
|
|
| 221.91 ± 0.21 a | 105.66 ± 2.11 f | 30.41 ± 2.33 e | 24.51 ± 0.45 c | 80.44 ± 0.98 d |
|
| 162.71 ± 0.31 c | 56.90 ± 2.34 g | 27.45 ± 3.11 f | ND | 87.11 ± 1.78 e | |
|
| ND | 160.88 ± 3.44 c | 273.84 ± 7.44 b | ND | ND | |
|
|
| ND | 117.42 ± 4.11 e | ND | 41.8 ± 3.22 b | 619.59 ± 9.78 b |
|
| ND | 103.13 ± 2.78 f | 49.73 ± 0.54 d | ND | ND | |
|
| ND | 183.32 ± 5.43 b | 287.77 ± 0.21 a | ND | ND | |
|
|
| ND | 127.52 ± 0.45 d | ND | 87.45 ± 2.54 a | 947.85 ± 9.76 a |
|
| ND | 205.91 ± 0.21 a | 85.76 ± 1.45 c | ND | ND | |
ND = not detected. All analyses are the mean of nine measurements ± standard error of mean. Results expressed in µg·g−1 of dry plant material. Means not sharing a common letter were significantly different at * p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2The RP-HPLC chromatogram of flavonoids compounds in the leaves of Labisia pumila. Compound identification as labeled.
Percent of increase or decrease of flavonoid compounds in three varieties of Labisia pumila grown under elevated CO2 concentration (800 and 1,200 µmol·mol−1)
| Flavonoid compounds | Var
| Var
| Var
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 800 (µmol·mol−1) | 1,200 (µmol·mol−1) | 800 (µmol·mol−1) | 1,200 (µmol·mol−1) | 800 (µmol·mol−1) | 1,200 (µmol·mol−1) | |
|
| −100% | −100% | −100% | −100% | −100% | −100% |
|
| +179% | +221% | +10% | +20% | +81% | +260% |
|
| +210% | +226% | −100% | −100% | +75% | +203% |
|
| 0% | 0% | +70% | +262% | 0% | 0% |
|
| −100% | −100% | +683% | +1100% | −100% | −100% |
Results expressed in percent; + and − indicate respectively increase and decrease of component concentrations when exposed to CO2.
Figure 3The effects of different CO2 concentration on PAL activity of three varieties of L. pumila. N = 9. Bars represent standard error of differences between means (SEM).
Figure 4Leaf DPPH scavenging activities in different varieties of L. pumila under different CO2 levels. BHT and α-tocopherol were used as positive controls.
Figure 5Leaf total antioxidant activity (FRAP) in different varieties of L. pumila under different CO2 levels. BHT and α-tocopherol were used as positive controls.