| Literature DB >> 21544039 |
Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim1, Hawa Z E Jaafar.
Abstract
A split plot 3 by 3 experiment was designed to investigate and distinguish the relationships among production of primary metabolites (soluble sugar andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21544039 PMCID: PMC6263315 DOI: 10.3390/molecules16053761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Accumulation and partitioning of total flavonoids (TF) and total phenolics (TP) in different plant parts of Labisia pumila Blume under different CO2 levels.
| CO2 levels | Plant parts | Total flavonoid | Total phenolics |
|---|---|---|---|
| (µmol mol−1) | (mg g−1 rutin dry weight) | (mg g-1 Gallic acid dry weight) | |
| 400 | Leaf | 0.126 ± 0.018a | 0.815 ± 0.017a |
| Stem | 0.081 ± 0.022b | 0.511 ± 0.022b | |
| Root | 0.062 ± 0.032c | 0.321 ± 0.018c | |
| 800 | Leaf | 0.227 ± 0.017a | 1.067 ± 0.023a |
| Stem | 0.133 ± 0.023b | 0.778 ± 0.021b | |
| Root | 0.087 ± 0.024c | 0.443 ± 0.011c | |
| 1,200 | Leaf | 0.246 ± 0.021a | 1.289 ± 0.032a |
| Stem | 0.145 ± 0.032b | 0.872 ± 0.027b | |
| Root | 0.095 ± 0.031c | 0.554 ± 0.041c |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). N = 15. Means not sharing a common letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.
Correlations among the measured parameters in the experiments.
| Parameters | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
|
| 0.97* | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
|
| 0.98* | 0.98* | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
|
| 0.87* | 0.82* | 0.80* | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
|
| 0.77* | 0.76* | 0.76* | 0.77* | 1.00 | |||||||||||
|
| 0.87* | 0.87* | 0.86* | 0.78* | 0.77* | 1.00 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.77* | 0.67 | 0.04 | 0.56 | 0.08 | 0.77* | 1.00 | |||||||||
|
| −0.87* | −0.92* | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.87* | 0.13 | 1.00 | ||||||||
|
| 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.56 | 0.77* | 0.01 | −0.12 | 1.00 | |||||||
|
| 0.78* | 0.77* | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.76* | 1.00 | ||||||
|
| −0.76* | −0.77* | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.34 | −0.33 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.07 | 1.00 | |||||
|
| −0.75* | −0.88* | 0.43 | 0.23 | 0.32 | −0.32 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.88* | 1.00 | ||||
|
| −0.78* | −0.76* | 0.54 | 0.21 | 0.36 | −0.21 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.89* | 0.88* | 1.00 | |||
|
| 0.88* | 0.76* | 0.65 | 0.57* | 0.67* | 0.87* | 0.32 | 0.78 | 0.75* | 0.23 | −0.78* | −0.66* | −0.89* | 1.00 | ||
|
| 0.87* | 0.78* | 0.05 | 0.41 | 0.12 | 0.86* | 0.07 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.91* | 0.87* | 1.00 | |
|
| −0.87* | −0.76* | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.03 | −0.76* | 0.21 | −0.65* | −0.76* | −0.78* | 0.78* | 0.56* | −0.87* | −0.89* | −0.54 | 1.00 |
* and ** respectively significant at P ≤ 0.05 or P ≤ 0.01.
Accumulation and partitioning of total soluble sugar (TSS), starch and total non structurable carbohydrate (TNC) in different plant parts of Labisia pumila Blume. under different CO2 levels.
| CO2 levels | Plant parts | TSS (mg g−1 sucrose dry weight) | Starch (mg g−1 glucose dry weight) | TNC (mg g−1 dry weight) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (µmol mol−1) | ||||
| 400 | Leaf | 15.10 ± 0.65a | 40.34 ± 0.98a | 56.14 ± 2.31a |
| Stem | 12.32 ± 0.77b | 30.24 ± 0.87b | 42.57 ± 1.16b | |
| Root | 10.34 ± 0.87c | 24.34 ± 0.66c | 34.68 ± 1.09c | |
| 800 | Leaf | 25.10 ± 0.56a | 56.67 ± 0.67a | 81.65 ± 0.99a |
| Stem | 18.76 ± 0.44b | 45.67 ± 0.44b | 65.78 ± 0.78b | |
| Root | 15.32 ± 0.76c | 32.16 ± 0.57c | 47.67 ± 1.45c | |
| 1,200 | Leaf | 26.97 ± 0.76a | 70.24 ± 0.55a | 97.21 ± 3.21a |
| Stem | 19.45 ± 0.56b | 60.54 ± 0.45b | 79.89 ± 4.32b | |
| Root | 15.43 ± 0.43c | 45.67 ± 0.32c | 62.10 ± 4.12c |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 15. Means not sharing a common single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.
Effects of different nitrogen levels on some physiological parameters in L. pumila Blume under CO2 enrichment.
| Parameters | 400 µmol mol−1 | 800 µmol mol−1 | 1,200 µmol mol−1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net photosynthesis | 5.73 ± 0.56c | 11.10 ± 0.44b | 13.01 ± 0.67a |
| fv/fm | 0.76 ± 0.02c | 0.89 ± 0.12b | 0.93 ± 0.07a |
| Leaf nitrogen | 2.96 ± 0.17a | 1.63 ± 0.06b | 0.97 ± 0.01c |
| Leaf carbon | 27.64 ± 1.23c | 32.14 ± 1.09b | 34.12 ± 1.78a |
| C/N | 9.33 ± 0.77c | 19.07 ± 0.98b | 34.55 ± 2.34a |
| Chlorophyll a | 6.16 ± 0.76a | 3.12 ± 0.11b | 2.97 ± 0.56c |
| Chlorophyll b | 17.36 ± 0.12a | 12.76 ± 0.32b | 11.76 ± 0.21c |
| Chlorophyll a+b | 24.22 ± 1.23a | 16.13 ± 0.97b | 12.89 ± 0.88c |
| Total biomass | 10.78 ± 1.23c | 16.04 ± 0.76b | 17.48 ± 0.22a |
| Specific leaf area | 48.90 ± 2.23a | 42.32 ± 1.23b | 39.87 ± 1.23c |
| Protein content | 7.17 ± 1.23a | 6.06 ± 0.98b | 4.17 ± 2.31c |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 15. Means not sharing a common single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.