| Literature DB >> 21775936 |
Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim1, Hawa Z E Jaafar.
Abstract
A randomized complete randomized design (RCBD) 3 by 3 experiment was designed to investigate and distinguish the relationships among production of secondary metabolites (total phenolics, TP; total flavonoids, TF), gluthatione (GSH), oxidized gluthatione (GSSG), soluble carbohydrate and antioxidant activities of the Malaysian medicinal herb Labisia pumila Blume under three levels of CO₂ enrichment (400, 800 and 1,200 µmol mol⁻¹) for 15 weeks. It was found that the treatment effects were solely contributed by interaction of CO₂ levels and secondary metabolites distribution in plant parts, GSH, GSHH and antioxidant activities (peroxyl radicals (ROO), superoxide radicals (O₂), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and hydroxyl radicals (OH). The records of secondary metabolites, glutahione, oxidized gluthathione and antioxidant activities in a descending manner came from the leaf enriched with 1,200 µmol/mol CO₂ > leaf 800 µmol/mol CO₂ > leaf 400 µmol/mol CO₂ > stem 1,200 µmol/mol CO₂ > stem 800 µmol/mol CO₂ > stem 400 µmol/mol CO₂ > root 1,200 µmol/mol CO₂ > root 800 µmol/mol CO₂ > root 400 µmol/mol CO₂. Correlation analyses revealed strong significant positive coefficients of antioxidant activities with total phenolics, flavonoids, GSH and GSHH indicating that an increase in antioxidative activity of L. pumila under elevated CO₂ might be up-regulated by the increase in production of total phenolics, total flavonoids, GSH, GSHH and soluble sugar. This study implied that the medicinal potential of herbal plant such as L. pumila can be enhanced under elevated CO₂, which had simultaneously improved the antioxidative activity that indicated by the high oxygen radical absorbance activity against ROO, O₂, H₂O₂, and OH radicals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21775936 PMCID: PMC6264689 DOI: 10.3390/molecules16076068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Total phenolics and flavonoids contents in different parts of L. pumila under different CO2 concentration.
| CO2 levels (µmol/mol) | Plant parts | Total phenolics (mg/g gallic acid dry weight) | Total flavonoid (mg/g rutin dry weight) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Leaf | 0.835 ± 0.017b | 0.111 ± 0.018c |
| Stem | 0.531 ± 0.022d | 0.071 ± 0.022d | |
| Root | 0.311 ± 0.018e | 0.052 ± 0.032d | |
|
| Leaf | 1.167 ± 0.023a | 0.247 ± 0.017a |
| Stem | 0.678 ± 0.021c | 0.143 ± 0.023b | |
| Root | 0.343 ± 0.011c | 0.067 ± 0.024d | |
|
| Leaf | 1.259 ± 0.032a | 0.276 ± 0.021a |
| Stem | 0.862 ± 0.027b | 0.165 ± 0.032b | |
| Root | 0.554 ± 0.041d | 0.085 ± 0.031d |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 18. Means not sharing a common single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.
Antioxidant activity against Peroxyl Radicals (ROO), Superoxide Radicals (O2), Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) and Hydoxyl Radicals in different part of L. pumila under different CO2 concentration.
| CO2 levels (µmol mol−1) | Plants Parts | ROO (µmol TE/g dry wt) a | O2 (µmol α-tocopherol/g dry wt) b | H2O2 (µmol ascorbate/g dry wt) c | OH (µmol chlorogenic acid/g dry wt) d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | 132.61 ± 6.4a | 39.22 ± 0.7b | 19.45 ± 0.5a | 43.22 ± 2.7b | |
|
| Stem | 100.31 ± 5.3c | 27.43 ± 0.5c | 12.32 ± 0.1c | 33.21 ± 3.2c |
| Root | 94.32 ± 4.2d | 18.91 ± 1.6e | 9.23 ± 0.3e | 18.65 ± 1.9d | |
| Leaf | 142.32 ± 3.4a | 44.56 ± 2.3a | 23.34 ± 0.2a | 56.73 ± 4.2a | |
|
| Stem | 112.32 ± 2.3c | 32.12 ± 1.7c | 15.43 ± 0.1b | 40.12 ± 5.6b |
| Root | 87.34 ± 1.7d | 21.32 ± 2.7d | 12.34 ± 0.6c | 19.34 ± 6.2d | |
| Leaf | 145.67 ± 2.3a | 56.34 ± 3.6a | 26.54 ± 0.4a | 66.54 ± 4.2a | |
|
| Stem | 121.21 ± 7.8b | 39.23 ± 5.6b | 17.54 ± 1.3b | 53.21 ± 1.6a |
| Root | 89.34 ± 2.7d | 24.56 ± 7.3d | 13.32 ± 0.4c | 21.34 ± 0.8d |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 18. Means not sharing a common single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. a Data expressed as micromoles of Trolox equivalent per gram dry weight; b Data expressed as micromoles of α-tocopherol equivalent per gram dry weight; c Data expressed as micromoles of ascorbate equivalent per gram dry weight; d Data expressed as micromoles of chlorogenic acid equivalent per gram dry weight.
The correlationship between total phenolics (TP), total flavonoid (TF), Gluthatione (GSH). Oxidized Gluthatione (GSSH), peroxide radicals (ROO), superoxide radicals (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) hydroxyl radicals (OH) and sucrose (Suc) in the study.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.00 | ||||||||
|
| 0.97 * | 1.00 | |||||||
|
| 0.89 * | 0.78 * | 1.00 | ||||||
|
| 0.87 * | 0.87 * | 0.88 | 1.00 | |||||
|
| 0.87 * | 0.83 * | 0.84 * | 0.81 * | 1.00 | ||||
|
| 0.78 * | 0.83 ** | 0.86 * | 0.89 * | 0.85 * | 1.00 | |||
|
| 0.78 * | 0.75 * | 0.86 * | 0.90 * | 0.86 ** | 0.81 * | 1.00 | ||
|
| 0.76 * | 0.90 * | 0.89 * | 0.87 * | 0.83 * | 0.92 * | 0.79 * | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.88 * | 0.76 * | 0.87 * | 0.92 * | 0.86 * | 0.76 * | 0.81 * | 0.83 * | 1.00 |
* and ** respectively significant at P ≤ 0.05 or P ≤ 0.01.
Gluthathione (GSH), Oxidised Gluthatione (GSHO) and GSH/GSSG ratio in different part of L. pumila under different CO2 concentrations.
| CO2 levels (µmol mol−1) | Plant parts | GSH (nmol/g dry wt) | GSSG (nmol/g dry wt) | GSH/GSSG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | 744.21 ± 7.3b | 160.23 ± 24.1a | 4.64 ± 1.7b | |
|
| Stem | 624.21 ± 2.1c | 120.23 ± 1.7b | 4.10 ± 2.5c |
| Root | 504.23 ± 21.2d | 98.34 ± 1.7c | 3.93 ± 0.4d | |
| Leaf | 810.21 ± 3.4a | 176.34 ± 2.4a | 4.89 ± 0.6b | |
|
| Stem | 644.21 ± 2.7c | 132.12 ± 3.6b | 4.87 ± 1.7d |
| Root | 505.72 ± 3.6d | 100.23 ± 2.7c | 4.94 ± 2.8a | |
| Leaf | 890.22 ± 2.4a | 178.65 ± 2.4a | 5.85 ± 2.1a | |
|
| Stem | 698.22 ± 1.8b | 132.14 ± 3.5b | 4.08 ± 1.3c |
| Root | 554.42 ± 21.3d | 99.43 ± 12.3c | 5.37 ± 1.4a |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 18. Means not sharing a common single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.
Accumulation and partitioning of total soluble in different plant parts of L. pumila Blume. under different CO2 levels.
| CO2 levels (µmol mol−1) | Plant parts | TSS (mg g−1 sucrose dry weight) |
|---|---|---|
| Leaf | 16.10 ± 0.35c | |
|
| Stem | 14.12 ± 0.87c |
| Root | 9.34 ± 0.97e | |
| Leaf | 21.10 ± 0.46b | |
|
| Stem | 16.36 ± 0.44c |
| Root | 12.32 ± 0.56d | |
| Leaf | 27.96 ± 0.76a | |
|
| Stem | 19.45 ± 0.56b |
| Root | 14.24 ± 0.11c |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 18. Means not sharing a common single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.