| Literature DB >> 21191319 |
Mohd Hafiz Ibrahim1, Hawa Z E Jaafar, Asmah Rahmat, Zaharah Abdul Rahman.
Abstract
A factorial split plot 4 × 3 experiment was designed to examine and characterize the relationship among production of secondary metabolites (total phenolics, TP; total flavonoids, TF), carbohydrate content and photosynthesis of three varieties of the Malaysian medicinal herb Labisia pumila Benth. namely the varieties alata, pumila and lanceolata under CO(2) enrichment (1,200 µmol mol(-1)) combined with four levels of nitrogen fertilization (0, 90, 180 and 270 kg N ha(-1)). No varietal differences were observed, however, as the levels of nitrogen increased from 0 to 270 kg N ha(-1), the production of TP and TF decreased in the order leaves>roots>stems. The production of TP and TF was related to increased total non structural carbohydrate (TNC), where the increase in starch content was larger than that in sugar concentration. Nevertheless, the regression analysis exhibited a higher influence of soluble sugar concentration (r(2) = 0.88) than starch on TP and TF biosynthesis. Photosynthesis, on the other hand, displayed a significant negative relationship with TP and TF production (r(2) = -0.87). A decrease in photosynthetic rate with increasing secondary metabolites might be due to an increase in the shikimic acid pathway that results in enhanced production of TP and TF. Chlorophyll content exhibited very significant negative relationships with total soluble sugar, starch and total non structural carbohydrate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21191319 PMCID: PMC6259453 DOI: 10.3390/molecules16010162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Accumulation and partitioning of total flavonoids (TF) and total phenolics (TP) in different plant parts of Labisia pumila Benth. under different combinations of nitrogen levels and CO2 enrichment.
| Nitrogen levels | Plant parts | TF (mg Rutin/g dry weight) | TP (mg Gallic acid/g dry weight) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A-180 kg N ha-1* | Leaf | 0.317 ± 0.017c | 0.581 ± 0.019d |
| Stem | 0.143 ± 0.017d | 0.301 ± 0.017d | |
| Root | 0.308 ± 0.015c | 0.296 ± 0.013d | |
| 0 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 0.803 ± r0.013a | 1.410 ± r0.028a |
| Stem | 0.678 ± r0.022a | 1.164 ± r0.029a | |
| Root | 0.788 ± r0.013a | 1.222 ± r0.039a | |
| 90 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 0.515 ± r0.022b | 1.180 ± r0.032b |
| Stem | 0.388 ± r0.030b | 0.927 ± r0.037b | |
| Root | 0.498 ± r0.022b | 0.983 ± r0.051b | |
| 180 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 0.480 ± r0.013c | 0.862 ± r0.021c |
| Stem | 0.357 ± r0.010c | 0.610 ± r0.025c | |
| Root | 0.464 ± r0.015c | 0.666 ± r0.040c | |
| 270 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 0.212 ± r0.025d | 0.576 ± r0.008d |
| Stem | 0.116 ± r0.023d | 0.324 ± r0.011d | |
| Root | 0.197 ± r0.026d | 0.380 ± r0.028d |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 15. Means not sharing a common single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. A = Control at ambient CO2 levels (400 µmol-1 mol-1) and standard Nitrogen fertilization rates (180 kg N ha-1).
Correlations among the measured parameters in the experiments.
| Characteristics | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Photosynthesis | 1 | |||||||||||
| 2. PNUE | 0.04 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 3. Nitrogen | 0.85* | -0.47 | 1 | |||||||||
| 4. C:N ratio | -0.73* | 0.55 | -0.91** | 1 | ||||||||
| 5. Chlorophyll a | 0.77** | -0.38 | 0.88** | -0.81** | 1 | |||||||
| 6. Chlorophyll b | 0.77** | -0.38 | 0.88** | -0.81** | 0.90 | 1 | ||||||
| 7. T. Chlorophyll | 0.77* | -0.38 | 0.88* | -0.81* | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1 | |||||
| 8. TSS | -0.69* | 0.43 | -0.83** | 0.81** | -0.88** | -0.88** | -0.88** | 1 | ||||
| 9. Starch | -0.48 | 0.26 | -0.55** | 0.57** | -0.72** | -0.72** | -0.72** | 0.88* | 1 | |||
| 10. TNC | -0.58* | 0.34 | -0.69* | 0.69* | -0.81* | -0.81* | -0.81* | 0.96** | 0.98** | 1 | ||
| 11. Flavonoids | 0.77** | -0.38 | 0.88** | -0.81* | 0.90** | 0.90** | 0.90** | -0.88* | -0.72** | -0.80** | 1 | |
| 12. Phenolics | 0.77** | -0.38* | 0.88** | -0.81* | 0.90** | 0.90** | 0.90** | -0.88* | -0.72* | -0.81* | 1.00 | 1 |
* and ** respectively significant at P ≤ 0.05 or P ≤ 0.01.
Accumulation and partitioning of total soluble sugar (TSS), starch and total non structural carbohydrate (TNC) in different plant parts of Labisia pumila Benth. under different combinations of nitrogen levels and CO2 enrichment.
| Nitrogen levels | Plant parts | TSS (mg sucrose /g dry weight) | Starch (mg glucose /g dry weight) | TNC (mg /g dry weight) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A -180 kg N ha-1* | Leaf | 24.06 ±0.51c | 60.11 ± 0.19d | 84.16 ± 2.32c |
| Stem | 16.70 ± 1.15d | 23.01 ± 0.27d | 40.14 ± 1.67d | |
| Root | 20.21 ± 0.51c | 49. 6 ± 0.33d | 70.21 ± 2.32c | |
| 0 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 42.71 ± 0.50a | 89.41 ± 0.28a | 131.32 ± 3.21a |
| Stem | 32.04 ± 0.84a | 80.16 ± 0.29a | 113.21 ± 1.56a | |
| Root | 38.09 ± 0.50a | 78.22 ± 0.49a | 117.34 ± 3.56a | |
| 90 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 37.45 ± 0.49b | 78.18 ± 0.62b | 116.7 ± 5.77b |
| Stem | 22.26 ± 0.44b | 45.27 ± 0.47b | 67.23 ± 6.22b | |
| Root | 33.66 ± 0.49b | 67.98 ± 0.51b | 103.21 ± 7.55b | |
| 180 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 32.64 ± 0.59c | 86.22 ± 0.23c | 118.78 ± 5.67b |
| Stem | 15.10 ± 0.99d | 51.03 ± 0.25c | 66.31 ± 6.90c | |
| Root | 28.86 ± 0.58c | 66.67 ± 0.44c | 96.75 ± 7.90c | |
| 270 kg N ha-1 | Leaf | 23.80 ± 1.16d | 57.66 ± 0.23d | 82.22 ± 6.89d |
| Stem | 8.96 ± 0.70d | 32.42 ± 0.21d | 41.31 ± 8.65d | |
| Root | 20.02 ± 1.17d | 48.20 ± 0.28d | 68.31 ± 7.96d |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 15. Means not sharing a single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. A = Control at ambient CO2 levels (400 µmol-1 mol-1) and standard Nitrogen fertilization rates (180 kg N ha-1).
Effects of different nitrogen levels on some physiological parameters in L. pumila Benth. under CO2 enrichment.
| Parameters | *Ambient-180 kg N h-1 | 0 kg N h-1 | 90 kg N h-1 | 180 kg N h-1 | 270 kg N h-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photosynthesis | 5.29±0.04c | 4.98 ± 0.25a | 7.29 ± 0.26b | 8.46 ± 0.24c | 11.75 ± 0.47d |
| PNUE1 | 1.79 ± 0.06c | 3.09 ± 0.18a | 3.01 ± 0.17b | 2.45 ± 0.12c | 2.66 ± 0.12d |
| Leaf N content | 2.96 ± 0.10c | 1.63 ± 0.09a | 2.46 ± 0.11b | 3.47 ± 0.09c | 4.42 ± 0.08d |
| C:N2 | 12.64 ± 0.65c | 28.15 ± 1.15a | 18.29 ± 0.72b | 13.12 ± 0.42c | 10.29 ± 0.18d |
| Chlorophyll a | 5.48 ± 0.06c | 3.60 ± 0.123a | 4.35 ± 0.123b | 5.30 ± 0.05c | 6.16 ± 0.10d |
| Chlorophyll b | 16.38 ± 0.15c | 12.30 ± 0.26a | 13.92 ± 0.26b | 15.96 ± 0.11c | 17.85 ± 0.22d |
| Chlorophyll a +b | 21.86 ± 0.21c | 15.90 ± 0.39a | 18.21 ± 0.38b | 21.26 ± 0.16c | 24.01 ± 0.33d |
| Total soluble sugar | 24.04 ± 0.52c | 42.72 ± 0.50a | 37.45 ± 0.49b | 32.64 ± 0.60c | 23.80 ± 1.17d |
| Starch | 58.04 ± 0.52c | 84.05 ± 2.11a | 78.78 ± 2.18b | 72.75 ± 2.41c | 63.91 ± 2.98d |
| TNC3 | 82.07 ± 1.03c | 126.77 ± 2.47a | 116.24 ± 2.58b | 105.40 ± 2.93c | 87.71 ± 4.10d |
| Total flavonoids | 0.31 ± 0.01c | 0.51 ± 0.01a | 0.47 ± 0.01b | 0.33 ± 0.01c | 0.30 ± 0.01d |
| Total phenolics | 1.16 ± 0.21c | 1.43 ± 0.14a | 1.35 ± 0.23b | 1.25 ± 0.32c | 0.71 ± 0.24d |
All analyses are mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), N = 15. Means not sharing single letter were significantly different at P ≤ 0.05. *Control at ambient CO2 levels (400 µmol-1 mol-1) and standard nitrogen fertilization rate (180 kg N ha-1). 1 = Photosynthesis nitrogen use efficiency (µmol mol-1 N s-1); 2 = carbon to nitrogen ratio; 3 = total non structural carbohydrate (mg g-1).