Literature DB >> 28655547

Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

Diana S M Buist1, Hongyuan Gao2, Melissa L Anderson3, Tracy Onega4, Susan Brandzel5, Melissa A Rabelhofer6, Susan Carol Bradford7, Erin J Aiello Bowles8.   

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness of two outreach strategies on timely mammography adherence: a mammogram-specific reminder letter (sent just before a woman was due) to a birthday letter (addresses multiple preventive services and not timed around due dates). We evaluated screening mammography adherence following 79,848 mammogram-specific and 151,626 birthday letters mailed between 2002 and 2012 to women aged 40-74years enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Washington. Screening mammogram adherence was specifically tied to due date and was evaluated separately by age group and up-to-date or overdue status at the time of mailing. We used generalized estimating equations to account for correlation between repeated observations, to model the odds of screening mammography adherence by letter type. Among women up-to-date, adherence following birthday letters was 22-76% lower compared to the mammogram-specific reminders, with the greatest decreases in adherence in women aged 70-74. Birthday letters were more effective at activating screening uptake among some subgroups of overdue women aged 50-69 and most overdue women aged 70-74, but universally low adherence rates were observed in overdue women. Increasing number of recommended services for women aged 50-74 who were up-to-date resulted in 12-17% lower mammography adherence, but had no effect in women aged 40-49 or in overdue women. Birthday letters are less effective than mammogram-specific reminder letters at prompting women to undergo timely breast cancer screening, particularly among women up-to-date with screening. Birthday letters may be effective at increasing overall preventive care; however, supplemental outreach may be needed around the due date to increase timely preventive services receipt.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Breast cancer screening; Outreach; Preventive care; Preventive services; Reminder letters; Screening programs

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28655547      PMCID: PMC5638650          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  42 in total

Review 1.  Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Kathleen A Cronin; Helen I Meissner; Stephen H Taplin; Florence K Tangka; Jasmin A Tiro; Timothy S McNeel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Conflicting national recommendations and the use of screening mammography: does the physician's recommendation matter?

Authors:  S H Taplin; N Urban; V M Taylor; J Savarino
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

3.  Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminder letters on mammography screening compliance.

Authors:  Melissa A Romaire; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Melissa L Anderson; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Use of interactive voice response to improve colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Hannah Cohen-Cline; Karen J Wernli; Susan C Bradford; Mary Boles-Hall; David C Grossman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Revisions in the risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Program at Group Health Cooperative.

Authors:  S H Taplin; R S Thompson; F Schnitzer; C Anderman; V Immanuel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Richard Marshall; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

8.  Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation.

Authors:  Robert J Reid; Paul A Fishman; Onchee Yu; Tyler R Ross; James T Tufano; Michael P Soman; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 9.  Patient reminder and patient recall systems to improve immunization rates.

Authors:  Julie C Jacobson Vann; Peter Szilagyi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

10.  Impact of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on screening mammography rates on women in their 40s.

Authors:  Amy T Wang; Jiaquan Fan; Holly K Van Houten; Jon C Tilburt; Natasha K Stout; Victor M Montori; Nilay D Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Does mailing unsolicited HPV self-sampling kits to women overdue for cervical cancer screening impact uptake of other preventive health services in a United States integrated delivery system?

Authors:  Hitomi Kariya; Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; John Lin; Hongyuan Gao; Linda K Ko; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Social media and mobile health technology for cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Arlinda Ruco; Fahima Dossa; Jill Tinmouth; Diego Llovet; Teruko Kishibe; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Closing the Gap: A Comparison of Engagement Interventions to Achieve Equitable Breast Cancer Screening in Rural Illinois.

Authors:  Sarah Stewart de Ramirez; Jeremy McGarvey; Abby Lotz; Mackenzie McGee; Tenille Oderwald; Katherine Floess; Roopa Foulger; Melinda Cooling; Jonathan A Handler
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.

Authors:  Sujha Subramanian; Florence K L Tangka; Sonja Hoover; Amy DeGroff
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-10-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.