Literature DB >> 23025867

Patient-centered outcomes in imaging: quantifying value.

Ruth C Carlos1, Diana S M Buist, Karen J Wernli, J Shannon Swan.   

Abstract

The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute was created in response to a mandate to conduct comparative effectiveness research in clinical care to inform decision making. The institute will be funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund, through congressional set-asides, and by Medicare and private health insurers, through a per beneficiary fee. The institute is governed by a board with a broad stakeholder constitution. Key committees set the national agenda for patient-centered outcomes research, the agenda for funding priorities, and communication and dissemination of the evidence with the goal of increasing the rate of implementation of the evidence into policy. In imaging, patient-centered outcomes go beyond the traditional metrics of patient satisfaction. Instead, these outcomes need to encompass the benefits and harms, focus on outcomes relevant to patients, and provide information to inform decision making. Therefore, radiologists need to be involved as stakeholders in the design, conduct, and dissemination of this research.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23025867      PMCID: PMC3810945          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  11 in total

1.  A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  G Scott Gazelle; Larry Kessler; David W Lee; Thomas McGinn; Joseph Menzin; Peter J Neumann; Derek van Amerongen; Leigh Ann White
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Applying value-based insurance design to low-value health services.

Authors:  A Mark Fendrick; Dean G Smith; Michael E Chernew
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Measuring the quality-of-life effects of diagnostic and screening tests.

Authors:  J Shannon Swan; Rebecca A Miksad
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Patient preferences in breast cancer screening: lessons to be learned from the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Gelareh Sadigh; Aine M Kelly; Angela Fagerlin; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminder letters on mammography screening compliance.

Authors:  Melissa A Romaire; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Melissa L Anderson; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Introduction to value-based payment modifiers.

Authors:  Gary J Becker; Jennifer L Bosma; Judy Burleson; James P Borgstede
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Quality-of-life assessment of fibroid treatment options and outcomes.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Chung Yin Kong; Clare M Tempany; J Shannon Swan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Process utility in breast biopsy.

Authors:  J Shannon Swan; William F Lawrence; Jessica Roy
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Process utility for imaging in cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  J Shannon Swan; François Sainfort; William F Lawrence; Vipat Kuruchittham; Thitima Kongnakorn; Dennis M Heisey
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Introduction to value-based insurance design.

Authors:  Aine Marie Kelly; Paul Cronin; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.532

View more
  6 in total

1.  Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Imaging Testing in US Primary Care.

Authors:  Monica L Zigman Suchsland; Elizabeth Witwer; Anjali R Truitt; Danielle C Lavallee; Ying Zhang; Philip Posner; Brian Do; Patrick M Bossuyt; Victoria Hardy; Matthew J Thompson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Women's experiences and preferences regarding breast imaging after completing breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Susan Brandzel; Dori E Rosenberg; Dianne Johnson; Mary Bush; Karla Kerlikowske; Tracy Onega; Louise Henderson; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Wendy DeMartini; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Maintaining primacy of the patient perspective in the development of patient-centered patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Rochelle E Tractenberg; Amanda Garver; Inger H Ljungberg; Manon M Schladen; Suzanne L Groah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Imaging-based patient-reported outcomes (PROs) database: How we do it.

Authors:  Soterios Gyftopoulos; Adam Jacobs; Mohammad Samim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Qualitative study to explore radiologist and radiologic technologist perceptions of outcomes patients experience during imaging in the USA.

Authors:  Monica Zigman Suchsland; Maria Jessica Cruz; Victoria Hardy; Jeffrey Jarvik; Gianna McMillan; Anne Brittain; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Patient-Centered Outcomes From Multiparametric MRI and MRI-Guided Biopsy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samuel W D Merriel; Victoria Hardy; Matthew J Thompson; Fiona M Walter; Willie Hamilton
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.532

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.