Literature DB >> 14572429

Screening rarely screened women: time-to-service and 24-month outcomes of tailored interventions.

Barbara Valanis1, Evelyn E Whitlock, John Mullooly, Thomas Vogt, Sabina Smith, ChuHe Chen, Russell E Glasgow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Managed care organizations and others reaching out to underscreened women seek strategies to encourage mammogram and Pap screening.
METHODS: Female HMO members aged 50-69 years and overdue for a mammogram and a Pap test (n = 501) were followed for 24 months after interventions began. An Outreach intervention (tailored letters and motivational telephone interviews), an Inreach intervention (motivational interview delivered in clinics), and a Combined Inreach/Outreach intervention were compared to Usual Care at 24 months. Logistic regression and Cox hazard models examined predictors of obtaining screening services and time-to-service, respectively.
RESULTS: Compared with Usual Care, the odds of Outreach women aged 50-64 obtaining a mammogram (OR = 2.06; 95% CI = 1.59-5.29), a Pap test (OR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.12-3.53), or both (OR = 2.53; 95% CI = 1.40-4.63) remained significantly increased at 24 months. The average time-to-service for Outreach women was reduced by 4 months. Outreach effects persisted despite intensive, ongoing health plan efforts to improve screening of all women.
CONCLUSIONS: This brief, tailored outreach intervention was an effective strategy for encouraging cervical and breast cancer screening among women overdue for both screening services. It also shortened time-to-service, an important benefit for early detection and treatment. Alternative strategies are needed for women who remain unscreened.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14572429     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00165-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  12 in total

1.  Patient Barriers to Mammography Identified During a Reminder Program.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminder letters on mammography screening compliance.

Authors:  Melissa A Romaire; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Melissa L Anderson; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Long-term results from a randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Lisa K Christman; Paul B Jacobsen; Jennifer Schroeder; Rania Abdulla; Seft Hunter
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Motivational interviewing to improve health screening uptake: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah J Miller; Kelly Foran-Tuller; Jessica Ledergerber; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-08-26

5.  Do cervical cancer screening rates increase in association with an intervention designed to increase mammography usage?

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Cecilia R Degraffinreid; Stephanie Dickinson; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Mammography rates for 20 community-based family practices in Ontario: a full practice audit.

Authors:  J Graham Swanson; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

7.  Breast cancer screening in an insured population: whom are we missing?

Authors:  Karin L Kempe; Rebecca Sam Larson; Susan Shetterley; Andra Wilkinson
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

8.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Transdiagnostic Motivational Enhancement Therapy to Reduce Treatment Attrition: Use in Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Lisa A Mistler; Ashli J Sheidow; Maryann Davis
Journal:  Cogn Behav Pract       Date:  2015-10-26

Review 10.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.