Literature DB >> 20587669

Randomized controlled trial of mammography intervention in insured very low-income women.

Nasar U Ahmed1, Gillian Haber, Kofi A Semenya, Margaret K Hargreaves.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The expectation that insurance coverage mitigates health disparities and equalizes use of healthcare assumes that services are equally accessed; however, the insured low-income target population in this research had a mammography rate of 23.4%, well below the general population. Our objective was to determine the most effective intervention to improve mammography use in low-income women insured by a managed care organization (MCO).
METHODS: The study was a randomized controlled trial. Participants were 2,357 women noncompliant with screening mammography randomly assigned to one of three groups: control (n = 786) received usual care; simple intervention (n = 785) received prompt letter from the MCO medical director; and stepwise intervention (n = 786) received the same prompt letter from the MCO; if noncompliant, a second prompt letter from their primary care physician and, if still noncompliant, counseling from lay health workers. Outcome was completion of screening mammography extracted from medical records.
RESULTS: Screening rates were 13.4% for the control, 16.1% for the simple intervention, and 27.1% for the stepwise intervention. Compared with the control, the primary care physician letter in the stepwise intervention increased the likelihood of screening by 80% [Relative Risk (RR) = 1.80; P < 0.001], and counseling tripled the likelihood of screening (RR = 3.11; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the control and simple intervention, a stepwise intervention to increase mammography is effective in a target population of hard-to-reach, low-income, insured women. IMPACT: The research provides evidence for the impact of stepwise interventions to improve cancer screening in low-income insured populations, although the screening rates remain well below those of the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20587669     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  16 in total

1.  Canadian cancer screening disparities: a recent historical perspective.

Authors:  J Kerner; J Liu; K Wang; S Fung; C Landry; G Lockwood; L Zitzelsberger; V Mai
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Comparative effectiveness of mailed reminder letters on mammography screening compliance.

Authors:  Melissa A Romaire; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Melissa L Anderson; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Community-based participatory approach to reduce breast cancer disparities in south Dallas.

Authors:  Kathryn Cardarelli; Rachael Jackson; Marcus Martin; Kim Linnear; Roy Lopez; Charles Senteio; Preston Weaver; Anna Hill; Jesse Banda; Marva Epperson-Brown; Janet Morrison; Deborah Parrish; J R Newton; Marcene Royster; Sheila Haley; Camille Lafayette; Phyllis Harris; Jamboor K Vishwanatha; Eric S Johnson
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2011

4.  Capsule Commentary on Percac-Lima et al., Decreasing Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Refugee Women Using Culturally-tailored Patient Navigation.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Whitley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Effects of Community-Based Health Worker Interventions to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Care Among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kyounghae Kim; Janet S Choi; Eunsuk Choi; Carrie L Nieman; Jin Hui Joo; Frank R Lin; Laura N Gitlin; Hae-Ra Han
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Interventions to improve adherence to surveillance guidelines in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Veda Zabih; Alyssa Kahane; Natalya E O'Neill; Noah Ivers; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 7.  Interventions to reach underscreened populations: a narrative review for planning cancer screening initiatives.

Authors:  Mavis Jones; Brenda Ross; Alyssa Cloth; Laura Heller
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  Patient navigation improves cancer diagnostic resolution: an individually randomized clinical trial in an underserved population.

Authors:  Peter C Raich; Elizabeth M Whitley; William Thorland; Patricia Valverde; Diane Fairclough
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Patient navigation for breast and colorectal cancer treatment: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Elizabeth Whitley; Samantha Hendren; Peter Raich; Sharon Humiston; Paul Winters; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Patricia Valverde; William Thorland; Ronald Epstein
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Sharon Humiston; Amna Idris; Shirley X L Li; Patricia Ford; Raymond Specht; Stephen Marcus; Michael Mendoza; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.