Literature DB >> 2262633

Revision of estimates of acoustic energy reflectance at the human eardrum.

M R Stinson1.   

Abstract

An improved analysis procedure has been applied to standing wave patterns measured previously [B. W. Lawton and M. R. Stinson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 1003-1009 (1986)] in human ear canals. Revised acoustic energy reflection coefficients, at the eardrum, are obtained for 20 ears for frequencies between 3 and 13 kHz. The new analysis addresses anomalous features of the standing wave patterns, apparent at frequencies above 8 kHz, due primarily to the curvature of the ear canal. Much better agreement is now found, at these higher frequencies, between the theoretical form assumed for the standing wave patterns and the experimental data. The revised values of eardrum reflectance are somewhat smaller, especially for frequencies above 11 kHz. The reflectance rises from about 0.25 at 4 kHz up to 0.7 at 8 kHz, falls to a minimum of 0.5 at 11 kHz, then rises to 0.6 at 13 kHz. Considerable intersubject variability in the results is noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2262633     DOI: 10.1121/1.400198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Wideband absorbance tympanometry using pressure sweeps: system development and results on adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An analysis of the acoustic input impedance of the ear.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Lauren E Gowdy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-06

5.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sound pressure distribution within natural and artificial human ear canals: forward stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Wave motion on the surface of the human tympanic membrane: holographic measurement and modeling analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Mohamad Hamade; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski; Ellery Harrington; Cosme Furlong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.