Literature DB >> 22624606

Response suppression by automatic retrieval of stimulus-stop association: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Yu-Chin Chiu1, Adam R Aron, Frederick Verbruggen.   

Abstract

Behavioral studies show that subjects respond more slowly to stimuli to which they previously stopped. This response slowing could be explained by "automatic inhibition" (i.e., the reinstantiation of motor suppression when a stimulus retrieves a stop association). Here we tested this using TMS. In Experiment 1, participants were trained to go or no-go to stimuli. Then, in a test phase, we compared the corticospinal excitability for go stimuli that were previously associated with stopping (no-go_then_go) with go stimuli that were previously associated with going (go_then_go). Corticospinal excitability was reduced for no-go_then_go compared with go_then_go stimuli at a mere 100 msec poststimulus. Although these results fit with automatic inhibition, there was, surprisingly, no suppression for no-go_then_no-go stimuli, although this should occur. We speculated that automatic inhibition lies within a continuum between effortful top-down response inhibition and no inhibition at all. When the need for executive control and active response suppression disappears, so does the manifestation of automatic inhibition. Therefore, it should emerge during go/no-go learning and disappear as performance asymptotes. Consistent with this idea, in Experiment 2, we demonstrated reduced corticospinal excitability for no-go versus go trials most prominently in the midphase of training but it wears off as performance asymptotes. We thus provide neurophysiological evidence for an inhibition mechanism that is automatically reinstantiated when a stimulus retrieves a learned stopping episode, but only in an executive context in which active suppression is required. This demonstrates that automatic and top-down inhibition jointly contribute to goal-directed behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22624606      PMCID: PMC4420637          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  27 in total

1.  Human cortical activities during Go/NoGo tasks with opposite motor control paradigms.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamanaka; Toshitaka Kimura; Makoto Miyazaki; Noritaka Kawashima; Daichi Nozaki; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Hideo Yano; Yoshiharu Yamamoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

3.  Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities.

Authors:  Junichi Chikazoe; Seiki Konishi; Tomoki Asari; Koji Jimura; Yasushi Miyashita
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A model of the go/no-go task.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

5.  Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition.

Authors:  Katrijn Houben; Chantal Nederkoorn; Reinout W Wiers; Anita Jansen
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks.

Authors:  Diane Swick; Victoria Ashley; U Turken
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Tim E Behrens; Steve Smith; Michael J Frank; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Dissociating inhibition, attention, and response control in the frontoparietal network using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chris M Dodds; Sharon Morein-Zamir; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  12 in total

1.  Inhibition-induced forgetting: when more control leads to less memory.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-11-14

Review 2.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

3.  A common stochastic accumulator with effector-dependent noise can explain eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Pooja Viswanathan; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Stimulus devaluation induced by stopping action.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; John P O'Doherty; Michael M Berkebile; David Linderman; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-10-13

5.  Independent subsequent memory effects of conflict resolution and response inhibition.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Fangqin Sun; Gloria A Dietz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-12

6.  Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael D Guthrie; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Stewart H Mostofsky; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Unconsciously triggered response inhibition requires an executive setting.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-01-14

8.  Neural mechanisms of goal-contingent task disengagement: Response-irrelevant stimuli activate the default mode network.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Reward prospect rapidly speeds up response inhibition via reactive control.

Authors:  Carsten N Boehler; Hanne Schevernels; Jens-Max Hopf; Christian M Stoppel; Ruth M Krebs
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

10.  Automatic inhibition and habitual control: alternative views in neuroscience research on response inhibition and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Agnes J Jasinska
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.