Literature DB >> 17214564

Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities.

Junichi Chikazoe1, Seiki Konishi, Tomoki Asari, Koji Jimura, Yasushi Miyashita.   

Abstract

The go/no-go task, which effectively taps the ability to inhibit prepotent response tendency, has consistently activated the lateral prefrontal cortex, particularly the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). On the other hand, rIFG activation has rarely been reported in the antisaccade task, seemingly an oculomotor version of the manual go/no-go task. One possible explanation for the variable IFG activation is the modality difference of the two tasks: The go/no-go task is performed manually, whereas the antisaccade task is performed in the oculomotor modality. Another explanation is that these two tasks have different task structures that require different cognitive processes: The traditional antisaccade task requires (i) configuration of a preparatory set prior to antisaccade execution and (ii) response inhibition at the time of antisaccade execution, whereas the go/no-go task requires heightened response inhibition under a minimal preparatory set. To test these possibilities, the traditional antisaccade task was modified in the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study such that it required heightened response inhibition at the time of antisaccade execution under a minimal preparatory set. Prominent activation related to response inhibition was observed in multiple frontoparietal regions, including the rIFG. Moreover, meta-analyses revealed that the rIFG activation in the present study was observed in the go/no-go tasks but not in the traditional antisaccade task, indicating that the rIFG activation was sensitive to the task structure difference, but not to the response modality difference. These results suggest that the rIFG is part of a network active during response inhibition across different response modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17214564     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  96 in total

1.  Emotion disrupts neural activity during selective attention in psychopathy.

Authors:  Naomi Sadeh; Jeffrey M Spielberg; Wendy Heller; John D Herrington; Anna S Engels; Stacie L Warren; Laura D Crocker; Bradley P Sutton; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Anxiety, a benefit and detriment to cognition: behavioral and magnetoencephalographic evidence from a mixed-saccade task.

Authors:  Brian R Cornwell; Sven C Mueller; Raphael Kaplan; Christian Grillon; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions.

Authors:  Tara A Niendam; Angela R Laird; Kimberly L Ray; Y Monica Dean; David C Glahn; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates decision making in a probabilistic guessing task.

Authors:  David Hecht; Vincent Walsh; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Sarah Durston; Dawn M Eagle; Gordon D Logan; Cathy M Stinear; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Inhibition of Action, Thought, and Emotion: A Selective Neurobiological Review.

Authors:  Daniel G Dillon; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Appl Prev Psychol       Date:  2007-12

7.  The triadic model perspective for the study of adolescent motivated behavior.

Authors:  Monique Ernst
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Common prefrontal regions activate during self-control of craving, emotion, and motor impulses in smokers.

Authors:  Golnaz Tabibnia; J David Creswell; Thomas Kraynak; Cecilia Westbrook; Erica Julson; Hilary A Tindle
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-09

9.  I lie, why don't you: Neural mechanisms of individual differences in self-serving lying.

Authors:  Lijun Yin; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Effects of working memory demand on neural mechanisms of motor response selection and control.

Authors:  Anita D Barber; Brian S Caffo; James J Pekar; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.