Literature DB >> 27253724

Neural mechanisms of goal-contingent task disengagement: Response-irrelevant stimuli activate the default mode network.

Brian A Anderson1, Charles L Folk2, Susan M Courtney3.   

Abstract

As we experience the world, we must decide not only when and how to act based on input from the environment, but also when to avoid responding in situations where acting could lead to a detrimental outcome. The ability to regulate behavior in this way requires flexible cognitive control, as the same stimulus may call for a response in one context but not in another. In this sense, explicit non-responding can be characterized as an active, goal-directed cognitive process. Little is known about the mechanisms by which a currently active goal state modulates information processing to support the avoidance of undesired responding. In the present study, participants executed or withheld responses to a color target based whether its color matched that of a cue at the beginning of each trial. Behavioral and neural responses to task-irrelevant stimuli appearing as distractors were examined as a function of their relationship to the currently response-relevant color indicated by the cue. We observed a robust pattern in which stimuli possessing the currently response-irrelevant feature activate the default mode network (DMN), which was associated with a behavioral cost on trials in which this stimulus competed with a response-relevant target. Our findings reveal a role for the DMN in goal-directed cognitive control, facilitating active disengagement based on contextually-specific task demands.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Default mode network; Inhibition; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27253724      PMCID: PMC4958573          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  45 in total

1.  The human prefrontal and parietal association cortices are involved in NO-GO performances: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Jobu Watanabe; Motoaki Sugiura; Kazunori Sato; Yuko Sato; Yasuhiro Maeda; Yoshihiko Matsue; Hiroshi Fukuda; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring.

Authors:  H Garavan; T J Ross; J Kaufman; E A Stein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Prefrontal-subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event-related fMRI.

Authors:  A M Clare Kelly; Robert Hester; Kevin Murphy; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Conditional automaticity in response selection: contingent involuntary response inhibition with varied stimulus-response mapping.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-19

5.  Response suppression by automatic retrieval of stimulus-stop association: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Adam R Aron; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study.

Authors:  H Garavan; T J Ross; E A Stein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dissociable roles of right inferior frontal cortex and anterior insula in inhibitory control: evidence from intrinsic and task-related functional parcellation, connectivity, and response profile analyses across multiple datasets.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Srikanth Ryali; Tianwen Chen; Chiang-Shan R Li; Vinod Menon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches.

Authors:  Donald G McLaren; Michele L Ries; Guofan Xu; Sterling C Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression.

Authors:  Yvette I Sheline; Deanna M Barch; Joseph L Price; Melissa M Rundle; S Neil Vaishnavi; Abraham Z Snyder; Mark A Mintun; Suzhi Wang; Rebecca S Coalson; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Investigating the functional heterogeneity of the default mode network using coordinate-based meta-analytic modeling.

Authors:  Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff; Karl Li; Donald A Robin; David C Glahn; Peter T Fox
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Adaptive contextualization: A new role for the default mode network in affective learning.

Authors:  Lars Marstaller; Hana Burianová; David C Reutens
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Controlled information processing, automaticity, and the burden of proof.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-07-07

4.  Perceptual integration rapidly activates dorsal visual pathway to guide local processing in early visual areas.

Authors:  Ling Liu; Fan Wang; Ke Zhou; Nai Ding; Huan Luo
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  The effect of task modality and stimulus frequency in paced serial addition tests on functional brain activity.

Authors:  Jeroen Gielen; Wietse Wiels; Jeroen Van Schependom; Jorne Laton; Wim Van Hecke; Paul M Parizel; Marie Beatrice D'hooghe; Guy Nagels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.