PURPOSE: To define stress distribution patterns inside a bone around suture anchors inserted at different angles using a three-dimensional finite element (FE) method. METHODS: An isotropic cube model (Young's modulus, 1,380 MPa; Poisson's ratio, 0.3) was designed on a computer to standardize analysis conditions. A virtual Twinfix anchor was inserted into the cube at two different angles (45° and 90°) against the top surface. A traction force (100 N) was applied to the anchor at six different angles (15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90°) against the top surface. Elastic analysis was performed, and the distribution of the von Mises equivalent stress inside the cube was calculated. The highest value of the equivalent stress at each traction angle was compared between the 45° and 90° anchor insertion settings. RESULTS: Stress concentration was most evident around proximal anchor threads, particularly on the traction side. Interestingly, stress gradually declined with an increase in traction angle only for the 90° insertion setting. At 15° and 90° traction angles, the equivalent stress was lower for the 45° insertion setting than for the 90° insertion setting. In contrast, the 90° insertion setting exhibited lower equivalent stress than the 45° insertion setting at 30°, 45° and 60° traction angles. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of an anchor at 90° might reduce the stress concentration around the proximal anchor threads on the traction side and provide lower equivalent stress in the middle range of traction angles (30°-60°) than insertion at 45°. This could avoid early postoperative anchor failure.
PURPOSE: To define stress distribution patterns inside a bone around suture anchors inserted at different angles using a three-dimensional finite element (FE) method. METHODS: An isotropic cube model (Young's modulus, 1,380 MPa; Poisson's ratio, 0.3) was designed on a computer to standardize analysis conditions. A virtual Twinfix anchor was inserted into the cube at two different angles (45° and 90°) against the top surface. A traction force (100 N) was applied to the anchor at six different angles (15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90°) against the top surface. Elastic analysis was performed, and the distribution of the von Mises equivalent stress inside the cube was calculated. The highest value of the equivalent stress at each traction angle was compared between the 45° and 90° anchor insertion settings. RESULTS: Stress concentration was most evident around proximal anchor threads, particularly on the traction side. Interestingly, stress gradually declined with an increase in traction angle only for the 90° insertion setting. At 15° and 90° traction angles, the equivalent stress was lower for the 45° insertion setting than for the 90° insertion setting. In contrast, the 90° insertion setting exhibited lower equivalent stress than the 45° insertion setting at 30°, 45° and 60° traction angles. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of an anchor at 90° might reduce the stress concentration around the proximal anchor threads on the traction side and provide lower equivalent stress in the middle range of traction angles (30°-60°) than insertion at 45°. This could avoid early postoperative anchor failure.
Authors: Markus J Tingart; Maria Apreleva; Janne Lehtinen; David Zurakowski; Jon J P Warner Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004-07-20 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Hyung Bin Park; Ekavit Keyurapan; Harpreet S Gill; Harpal S Selhi; Edward G McFarland Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Frank A Liporace; Christopher M Bono; Steven A Caruso; Bradley Weiner; Keith Penny; Andrew J Feldman; Mark G Grossman; Thomas R Haher Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Volker Braunstein; Stefan Milz; Christoph M Sprecher; Sonja Kirchhoff; Mathias Graw; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Hinterwimmer Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Lothar Schmechel Dobke; João Artur Bonadiman; Osmar Valadão Lopes; Paulo Renato Saggin; Charles Leonardo Israel; Leandro de Freitas Spinelli Journal: Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Date: 2020-07-22
Authors: Yan Chevalier; Maiko Matsuura; Sven Krüger; Hannes Traxler; Christoph Fleege; Michael Rauschmann; Christoph Schilling Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 5.853