Literature DB >> 17027403

Sutures and suture anchors--update 2006.

F Alan Barber1, Morley A Herbert, David A Coons, Michael H Boothby.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate recently introduced sutures and suture anchors for single pull load to failure strength and failure mode.
METHODS: Suture anchors were tested in fresh porcine metaphyseal cortex and cancellous troughs with the use of an established protocol. An Instron machine applied tensile loads parallel to the axis of insertion at a rate of 12.5 mm/sec until failure, and mean anchor failure strengths were calculated. The mode of failure (anchor pull-out, suture eyelet cut-out, or suture failure) was recorded. Anchors tested included the BioRaptor 2.9, BioZip, Super Revo, Impact, Allograft cortical anchor, SpiraLok, Herculon, AxyaLoop titanium anchors 3, 5, and 6.5 mm, AxyaLoop bioabsorbable anchors 3, 5, and 6.5, ParaFix titanium anchors 3, 5, and 6.5, ParaSorb BioAnchors 3, 5.5, and 6.5, and Bio-Corkscrew FT. Sutures were also tested through an established protocol for load to failure. Sutures tested consisted of Orthocord, Ultrabraid (White and CoBraid), ForceFiber, Hi-Fi, MagnumWire, and Maxbraid Polyethylene Plus.
RESULTS: Mean failure loads were as follows: BioRaptor 238 N, BioZip 366 N, double-loaded Super Revo 486 N, triple-loaded Super Revo 362 N, Impact 202 N, Allograft cortical anchor 240 N, SpiraLok 289 N, Herculon 819 N, AxyaLoop titanium anchors 3.0 (335 N), 5.0 (485 N), and 6.5 mm (465 N), AxyaLoop bioabsorbable anchors 3 (143 N), 5 (395 N), and 6.5 (369 N), ParaFix titanium anchors 3 (335 N), 5 (485 N), and 6.5 (465 N), ParaSorb BioAnchors 3 (143 N), 5.5 (395 N), and 6.5 (369 N), and Bio-Corkscrew FT (260 N). The sutures all broke at the mid point of their tested strands away from the grips. Mean suture strength for No. 2 Orthocord was 92 N; for No. 2 Ultrabraid CoBraid and White, strengths were 265 N and 280 N, respectively; strength for No. 2 Force Fiber was 289 N, for No. 2 Hi-Fi 250 N, for No. 2 MagnumWire 303 N, and for No. 2 Maxbraid Polyethylene Plus 256 N.
CONCLUSIONS: Newer suture products showed significant improvements in load to failure values when compared with braided polyester sutures. Higher load to failure values continue to be seen in metal versus biodegradable anchors and in screw-type versus nonscrew designs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons who prefer stronger sutures now have several high-strength suture options from which to choose. Most of the new anchors tested performed very well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027403     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  24 in total

1.  Stress distribution inside bone after suture anchor insertion: simulation using a three-dimensional finite element method.

Authors:  Hirotaka Sano; Atsushi Takahashi; Daisuke Chiba; Taku Hatta; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Material properties of common suture materials in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  S Najibi; R Banglmeier; Jm Matta; M Tannast
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

3.  Comparison between metal and biodegradable suture anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Milano; Andrea Grasso; Domenico A Santagada; Maristella F Saccomanno; Laura Deriu; Carlo Fabbriciani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Modified triple Kessler with least risk of elongation among Achilles tendon repair techniques: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of human cadaveric studies.

Authors:  Pedro Diniz; Jácome Pacheco; Ricardo M Fernandes; Hélder Pereira; Frederico Castelo Ferreira; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Cyclic loading comparison of Bio-SutureTak-#2 FiberWire and Bio Mini-Revo-#2 Hi-Fi suture anchor-sutures in cadaveric scapulae.

Authors:  Brad S Sparks; John Nyland; Akbar Nawab; Ethan Blackburn; Ryan Krupp; Robert Burden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Arthroscopic suturing of the rotator cuff. Placing of anchor, suturing and tying techniques].

Authors:  M Kettler; E Kurtoglu; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Rotator cuff tears: pathology and repair.

Authors:  Hemang Yadav; Shane Nho; Anthony Romeo; John D MacGillivray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Biomechanical evaluation of different suture materials for arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair of posterior meniscus root tears.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Eduardo Grande; Johannes Brunhuber; Nikolaus Rosenstiel; Rainer Burgkart; Andreas B Imhoff; Sepp Braun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a literature review.

Authors:  P Randelli; P Spennacchio; V Ragone; P Arrigoni; A Casella; P Cabitza
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-12-29

10.  The effect of inclination angle on the strength of vertical mattress configuration for meniscus repair.

Authors:  Mehmet Erduran; Onur Hapa; Baran Şen; Yavuz Kocabey; Diler Erdemli; Mehran Aksel; Hasan Havitçioğlu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.