INTRODUCTION: Shared decision-making between health care professionals, patients, parents, and guardians is widely recommended today. However, it is unclear what happens when collaborative language is used by physicians in clinical situations for which patients and parents/guardians believe there is no decision to be made. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study of decision-making for pediatric allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation by interviewing patients, parents, grandparents, donor siblings, and nondonor children after the decision to proceed to transplant but before the transplantation. Each interview was audio recorded, transcribed, and coded for major themes. RESULTS: In total, 107 members of 30 families at four sites were interviewed, including 15 patients, 22 mothers, 2 stepmothers, 1 grandmother, 19 fathers, 3 stepfathers, 1 grandfather, 13 sibling donors, and 31 nondonor children (siblings, half-siblings, and cousins). In all, 81% of parents/guardians, 73% of patients, 31% of donors, and 29% of other children reported there was no decision to be made. Almost all (88%) parents/guardians indicated that the physician's recommendation was a large determinant in their agreement to go forward with the transplantation. All parents/guardians reported that "agreeing to a plan" was a better description of what their consent entailed. CONCLUSIONS: To be respectful of patients and parents/guardians, we suggest that "agreeing to a plan" may be a better description for what parents/guardians must consider when the alternative to a transplantation is likely death. In this clinical context, the shared decision-making model with a focus on "a decision to be made" may be misleading.
INTRODUCTION: Shared decision-making between health care professionals, patients, parents, and guardians is widely recommended today. However, it is unclear what happens when collaborative language is used by physicians in clinical situations for which patients and parents/guardians believe there is no decision to be made. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study of decision-making for pediatric allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation by interviewing patients, parents, grandparents, donor siblings, and nondonor children after the decision to proceed to transplant but before the transplantation. Each interview was audio recorded, transcribed, and coded for major themes. RESULTS: In total, 107 members of 30 families at four sites were interviewed, including 15 patients, 22 mothers, 2 stepmothers, 1 grandmother, 19 fathers, 3 stepfathers, 1 grandfather, 13 sibling donors, and 31 nondonor children (siblings, half-siblings, and cousins). In all, 81% of parents/guardians, 73% of patients, 31% of donors, and 29% of other children reported there was no decision to be made. Almost all (88%) parents/guardians indicated that the physician's recommendation was a large determinant in their agreement to go forward with the transplantation. All parents/guardians reported that "agreeing to a plan" was a better description of what their consent entailed. CONCLUSIONS: To be respectful of patients and parents/guardians, we suggest that "agreeing to a plan" may be a better description for what parents/guardians must consider when the alternative to a transplantation is likely death. In this clinical context, the shared decision-making model with a focus on "a decision to be made" may be misleading.
Authors: Judy E Davidson; Karen Powers; Kamyar M Hedayat; Mark Tieszen; Alexander A Kon; Eric Shepard; Vicki Spuhler; I David Todres; Mitchell Levy; Juliana Barr; Raj Ghandi; Gregory Hirsch; Deborah Armstrong Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Mark R Mercurio; Edwin N Forman; Rosalind Ekman Ladd; Marilyn A Maxwell; Lainie Friedman Ross; Tomas J Silber Journal: Pediatr Rev Date: 2008-05
Authors: Cleveland G Shields; Gary R Morrow; Jennifer Griggs; Julie Mallinger; Joseph Roscoe; James L Wade; Shaker R Dakhil; Tom R Fitch Journal: Support Cancer Ther Date: 2004-01-01
Authors: Jean Carlet; Lambertus G Thijs; Massimo Antonelli; Joan Cassell; Peter Cox; Nicholas Hill; Charles Hinds; Jorge Manuel Pimentel; Konrad Reinhart; Boyd Taylor Thompson Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-04-20 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Lori Wiener; Jennifer A Hoag; Wendy Pelletier; Nirali N Shah; Bronwen E Shaw; Michael A Pulsipher; Jessica Bruce; Peter Bader; Andre M Willasch; Arnaud Dalissier; Gregory Guilcher; Chloe Anthias; Dennis L Confer; Jennifer A Sees; Brent Logan; Galen E Switzer Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Sadie P Hutson; Paul K J Han; Jada G Hamilton; Sean C Rife; Mohamad M Al-Rahawan; Richard P Moser; Seth P Duty; Sheeba Anand; Blanche P Alter Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Taylor E White; Kristopher A Hendershot; Margie D Dixon; Wendy Pelletier; Ann Haight; Kristin Stegenga; Melissa A Alderfer; Lydia Cox; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Pamela Hinds; Rebecca D Pentz Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Charlotte Gerrity; Samantha Farley; Mary C Barks; Peter A Ubel; Debra Brandon; Kathryn I Pollak; Monica E Lemmon Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 2.363
Authors: Katherine E Heinze; Angie Mae Rodday; Marie T Nolan; Kristin Bingen; Mary Jo Kupst; Sunita K Patel; Karen Syrjala; Lynnette Harris; Christopher Recklitis; Lisa Schwartz; Stella Davies; Eva C Guinan; Robert Noll; Grace Chang; Susan K Parsons Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.186