Literature DB >> 16983102

What is the impact of shared decision making on treatment and outcomes for older women with breast cancer?

Jeanne Mandelblatt1, Barbara Kreling, Melissa Figeuriedo, Shibao Feng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Shared decision making (SDM) has been recommended as a standard of care, especially when there are treatment alternatives or uncertainty in outcomes. However, we know little about use of SDM in cancer care, and even less is known about SDM in older patients. We describe patient and physician determinants of SDM in older women with breast cancer and evaluate whether SDM is associated with treatment patterns or short-term outcomes of care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women age 67 or older treated for early stage breast cancer in 29 sites from five geographic regions comprise the study sample (N = 718). Data were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews. Physician data were collected via survey, and medical records were reviewed to ascertain comorbidity and tumor characteristics. Random effects and logistic regression models were used to assess associations between SDM and other factors.
RESULTS: Women who were age 67 to 74 years (v 75 or older) were accompanied to consultation and who sought information reported the highest SDM, after considering covariates. While SDM was not associated with surgical treatment, greater SDM was associated with higher odds of having adjuvant treatment, controlling for clinical factors. Greater SDM was also associated with improved short-term satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: SDM plays an important role in the process of care for older women with breast cancer. Physicians treating this growing population have a simple, but powerful tool for improving outcomes within their grasp-spending time to engage and involve older women in their breast cancer care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16983102     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.1159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

Review 1.  Impact of hearing loss on clinical interactions between older adults and health professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Smith; Muhammad Arsyad Bin Nordin; Tom Hinchy; Patrick Henn; Colm M P O'Tuathaigh
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  A conceptual model of the role of communication in surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Sandra Petronio; Greg A Sachs; Paul R Helft; Christianna Purnell
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-09-01

3.  Health literacy, numeracy, and other characteristics associated with hospitalized patients' preferences for involvement in decision making.

Authors:  Kathryn M Goggins; Kenneth A Wallston; Samuel Nwosu; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Liana Castel; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014

4.  Feasibility of Providing Web-Based Information to Breast Cancer Patients Prior to a Surgical Consult.

Authors:  Jordan G Bruce; Jennifer L Tucholka; Nicole M Steffens; Jane E Mahoney; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Shared decision-making in pediatric allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation: what if there is no decision to make?

Authors:  Rebecca D Pentz; Wendy Pelletier; Melissa A Alderfer; Kristin Stegenga; Diane L Fairclough; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-05-21

6.  Measuring the quality of surgical decisions for Latina breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Karen Sepucha; Sandra Feibelmann; Yuchiao Chang; Sarah Hewitt; Argyrios Ziogas
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Quality of life of women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  T S Lee; S L Kilbreath; K M Refshauge; S C Pendlebury; J M Beith; M J Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Satisfaction with care among low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Lalima Hoq; Allison Diamant; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Understanding the quality chasm for hypertension control in diabetes: a structured review of "co-maneuvers" used in clinical trials.

Authors:  Aanand D Naik; Tim T Issac; Richard L Street; Mark E Kunik
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

10.  "Surgery is certainly one good option": quality and time-efficiency of informed decision-making in surgery.

Authors:  Clarence Braddock; Pamela L Hudak; Jacob J Feldman; Sylvia Bereknyei; Richard M Frankel; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.