Literature DB >> 17205007

Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005.

Judy E Davidson, Karen Powers, Kamyar M Hedayat, Mark Tieszen, Alexander A Kon, Eric Shepard, Vicki Spuhler, I David Todres, Mitchell Levy, Juliana Barr, Raj Ghandi, Gregory Hirsch, Deborah Armstrong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the support of the patient and family in the adult, pediatric, or neonatal patient-centered ICU. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary task force of experts in critical care practice was convened from the membership of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) to include representation from adult, pediatric, and neonatal intensive care units. EVIDENCE: The task force members reviewed the published literature. The Cochrane library, Cinahl, and MedLine were queried for articles published between 1980 and 2003. Studies were scored according to Cochrane methodology. Where evidence did not exist or was of a low level, consensus was derived from expert opinion. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The topic was divided into subheadings: decision making, family coping, staff stress related to family interactions, cultural support, spiritual/religious support, family visitation, family presence on rounds, family presence at resuscitation, family environment of care, and palliative care. Each section was led by one task force member. Each section draft was reviewed by the group and debated until consensus was achieved. The draft document was reviewed by a committee of the Board of Regents of the ACCM. After steering committee approval, the draft was approved by the SCCM Council and was again subjected to peer review by this journal.
CONCLUSIONS: More than 300 related studies were reviewed. However, the level of evidence in most cases is at Cochrane level 4 or 5, indicating the need for further research. Forty-three recommendations are presented that include, but are not limited to, endorsement of a shared decision-making model, early and repeated care conferencing to reduce family stress and improve consistency in communication, honoring culturally appropriate requests for truth-telling and informed refusal, spiritual support, staff education and debriefing to minimize the impact of family interactions on staff health, family presence at both rounds and resuscitation, open flexible visitation, way-finding and family-friendly signage, and family support before, during, and after a death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17205007     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254067.14607.EB

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  212 in total

Review 1.  Integration of palliative care in chronic critical illness management.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Aluko A Hope
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  The strength to cope: spirituality and faith in chronic disease.

Authors:  Nalika Unantenne; Narelle Warren; Rachel Canaway; Lenore Manderson
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2013-12

3.  Use of augmentative and alternative communication strategies by family members in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lauren M Broyles; Judith A Tate; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Communication practices in physician decision-making for an unstable critically ill patient with end-stage cancer.

Authors:  Deepika Mohan; Stewart C Alexander; Sarah K Garrigues; Robert M Arnold; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Teamwork When Conducting Family Meetings: Concepts, Terminology, and the Importance of Team-Team Practices.

Authors:  Jennifer K Walter; Robert M Arnold; Martha A Q Curley; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Development of a post-intensive care unit storytelling intervention for surrogates involved in decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Mary Amanda Dew; Charles F Reynolds; Robert M Arnold; Greer A Tiver; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2014-02-13

7.  Variation in decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapies in US ICUs.

Authors:  Caroline M Quill; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Michael O Harhay; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Parental Perceptions of Displayed Patient Data in a PICU: An Example of Unintentional Empowerment.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Matthew C Scanlon; Bradley Crotty; Richard J Holden; Kathryn E Flynn
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.624

9.  Factors affecting stress experienced by surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients: implications for nursing practice.

Authors:  Ellen Iverson; Aaron Celious; Carie R Kennedy; Erica Shehane; Alexander Eastman; Victoria Warren; Bradley D Freeman
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.072

10.  Assessment of satisfaction with care among family members of survivors in a neuroscience intensive care unit.

Authors:  David Y Hwang; Daniel Yagoda; Hilary M Perrey; Tara M Tehan; Mary Guanci; Lillian Ananian; Paul F Currier; J Perren Cobb; Jonathan Rosand
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.