Literature DB >> 22608968

A position-specific distance-dependent statistical potential for protein structure and functional study.

Feng Zhao1, Jinbo Xu.   

Abstract

Although studied extensively, designing highly accurate protein energy potential is still challenging. A lot of knowledge-based statistical potentials are derived from the inverse of the Boltzmann law and consist of two major components: observed atomic interacting probability and reference state. These potentials mainly distinguish themselves in the reference state and use a similar simple counting method to estimate the observed probability, which is usually assumed to correlate with only atom types. This article takes a rather different view on the observed probability and parameterizes it by the protein sequence profile context of the atoms and the radius of the gyration, in addition to atom types. Experiments confirm that our position-specific statistical potential outperforms currently the popular ones in several decoy discrimination tests. Our results imply that, in addition to reference state, the observed probability also makes energy potentials different and evolutionary information greatly boost performance of energy potentials.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22608968      PMCID: PMC3372698          DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2012.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  80 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition.

Authors:  A R Panchenko; A Marchler-Bauer; S H Bryant
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Can a pairwise contact potential stabilize native protein folds against decoys obtained by threading?

Authors:  M Vendruscolo; R Najmanovich; E Domany
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-02-01

4.  Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity.

Authors:  J Skolnick; A Kolinski; A Ortiz
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-01-01

5.  Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction.

Authors:  R Samudrala; M Levitt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  HMMSTR: a hidden Markov model for local sequence-structure correlations in proteins.

Authors:  C Bystroff; V Thorsson; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  C Notredame; D G Higgins; J Heringa
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-09-08       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins.

Authors:  K T Simons; I Ruczinski; C Kooperberg; B A Fox; C Bystroff; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-01-01

9.  Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins.

Authors:  S Tanaka; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.985

10.  Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions.

Authors:  A Zemla; C Venclovas; J Moult; K Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999
View more
  29 in total

1.  Protein contact prediction by integrating joint evolutionary coupling analysis and supervised learning.

Authors:  Jianzhu Ma; Sheng Wang; Zhiyong Wang; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops.

Authors:  Guang Qiang Dong; Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Ben Webb; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Distance-based protein folding powered by deep learning.

Authors:  Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  AlphaFold at CASP13.

Authors:  Mohammed AlQuraishi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  CoinFold: a web server for protein contact prediction and contact-assisted protein folding.

Authors:  Sheng Wang; Wei Li; Renyu Zhang; Shiwang Liu; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning.

Authors:  Andrew W Senior; Richard Evans; John Jumper; James Kirkpatrick; Laurent Sifre; Tim Green; Chongli Qin; Augustin Žídek; Alexander W R Nelson; Alex Bridgland; Hugo Penedones; Stig Petersen; Karen Simonyan; Steve Crossan; Pushmeet Kohli; David T Jones; David Silver; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Refinement by shifting secondary structure elements improves sequence alignments.

Authors:  Jing Tong; Jimin Pei; Zbyszek Otwinowski; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-01-13

9.  Study of Real-Valued Distance Prediction for Protein Structure Prediction with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Jin Li; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Structure-conditioned amino-acid couplings: How contact geometry affects pairwise sequence preferences.

Authors:  Jack Holland; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.