Literature DB >> 10526349

Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions.

A Zemla1, C Venclovas, J Moult, K Fidelis.   

Abstract

Livermore Prediction Center provides basic infrastructure for the CASP (Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) experiments, including prediction processing and verification servers, a system of prediction evaluation tools, and interactive numerical and graphical displays. Here we outline the essentials of our approach, with discussion of the superposition procedures, definitions of basic measures, and descriptions of new methods developed to analyze predictions. Our primary focus is on the evaluation of three-dimensional models and secondary structure predictions. To put the results of the three prediction experiments held to date on the same footing, the latest CASP3 evaluation criteria were retrospectively applied to both CASP1 and CASP2 predictions. Finally, we give an overview of our website (http:/(/)PredictionCenter.llnl.gov), which makes the target structures, predictions, and the evaluation system accessible to the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10526349     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<22::aid-prot5>3.3.co;2-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  114 in total

1.  Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition.

Authors:  J Lundström; L Rychlewski; J Bujnicki; A Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Search and discovery strategies for biotechnology: the paradigm shift.

Authors:  A T Bull; A C Ward; M Goodfellow
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison.

Authors:  Angel R Ortiz; Charlie E M Strauss; Osvaldo Olmea
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Planning combinatorial disulfide cross-links for protein fold determination.

Authors:  Fei Xiong; Alan M Friedman; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  In search for more accurate alignments in the twilight zone.

Authors:  Lukasz Jaroszewski; Weizhong Li; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures.

Authors:  Adam Zemla
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Template-based protein structure modeling using TASSER(VMT.).

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-22

8.  An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment.

Authors:  Qian Cong; Lisa N Kinch; Jimin Pei; Shuoyong Shi; Vyacheslav N Grishin; Wenlin Li; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?

Authors:  Jinrui Xu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  The expanded FindCore method for identification of a core atom set for assessment of protein structure prediction.

Authors:  David A Snyder; Jennifer Grullon; Yuanpeng J Huang; Roberto Tejero; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.