Literature DB >> 22585699

Adoption of gene expression profile testing and association with use of chemotherapy among women with breast cancer.

Michael J Hassett1, Samuel M Silver, Melissa E Hughes, Douglas W Blayney, Stephen B Edge, James G Herman, Clifford A Hudis, P Kelly Marcom, Jane E Pettinga, David Share, Richard Theriault, Yu-Ning Wong, Jonathan L Vandergrift, Joyce C Niland, Jane C Weeks.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gene expression profile (GEP) testing is a relatively new technology that offers the potential of personalized medicine to patients, yet little is known about its adoption into routine practice. One of the first commercially available GEP tests, a 21-gene profile, was developed to estimate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR-positive BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: By using a prospective registry data set outlining the routine care provided to women diagnosed from 2006 to 2008 with HR-positive BC at 17 comprehensive and community-based cancer centers, we assessed GEP test adoption and the association between testing and chemotherapy use.
RESULTS: Of 7,375 women, 20.4% had GEP testing and 50.2% received chemotherapy. Over time, testing increased (14.7% in 2006 to 27.5% in 2008; P < .01) and use of chemotherapy decreased (53.9% in 2006 to 47.0% in 2008; P < .01). Characteristics independently associated with lower odds of testing included African American versus white race (odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.92) and high school or less versus more than high school education (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76). Overall, testing was associated with lower odds of chemotherapy use (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.80). Stratified analyses demonstrated that for small, node-negative cancers, testing was associated with higher odds of chemotherapy use (OR, 11.13; 95% CI, 5.39 to 22.99), whereas for node-positive and large node-negative cancers, testing was associated with lower odds of chemotherapy use (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.17).
CONCLUSION: There has been a progressive increase in use of this GEP test and an associated shift in the characteristics of and overall reduction in the proportion of women with HR-positive BC receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22585699      PMCID: PMC3397718          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  37 in total

1.  TAILORx: trial assigning individualized options for treatment (Rx).

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Wanseop Kim; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Drew Watson; John Bryant; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Economic analysis of gene expression profile data to guide adjuvant treatment in women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Leon E Cosler; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Impact of a 21-gene RT-PCR assay on treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer: an economic analysis based on prognostic and predictive validation studies.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Leon E Cosler; Nicole M Kuderer; John Hornberger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Kathy S Albain; William E Barlow; Steven Shak; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Robert B Livingston; I-Tien Yeh; Peter Ravdin; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Nancy E Davidson; George W Sledge; Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; Kathleen I Pritchard; Lois Shepherd; Julie R Gralow; Carl Yoshizawa; D Craig Allred; C Kent Osborne; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Chemotherapy use for hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Melissa E Hughes; Joyce C Niland; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Yu-Ning Wong; John Wilson; W Bradford Carter; Douglas W Blayney; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lyndsay Harris; Herbert Fritsche; Robert Mennel; Larry Norton; Peter Ravdin; Sheila Taube; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Rosell; Teresa Moran; Cristina Queralt; Rut Porta; Felipe Cardenal; Carlos Camps; Margarita Majem; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Dolores Isla; Mariano Provencio; Amelia Insa; Bartomeu Massuti; Jose Luis Gonzalez-Larriba; Luis Paz-Ares; Isabel Bover; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Miguel Angel Moreno; Silvia Catot; Christian Rolfo; Noemi Reguart; Ramon Palmero; José Miguel Sánchez; Roman Bastus; Clara Mayo; Jordi Bertran-Alamillo; Miguel Angel Molina; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miquel Taron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The MINDACT trial: the first prospective clinical validation of a genomic tool.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Laura Van't Veer; Emiel Rutgers
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection.

Authors:  Shelly S Lo; Patricia B Mumby; John Norton; Karen Rychlik; Jeffrey Smerage; Joseph Kash; Helen K Chew; Ellen R Gaynor; Daniel F Hayes; Andrew Epstein; Kathy S Albain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  63 in total

1.  Chemotherapy and the recurrence score--results as expected?

Authors:  Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Weixiong Dang; Ilana Richman; Sarah S Mougalian; Suzanne B Evans; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Uptake of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer practice: views of academic and community-based oncologists.

Authors:  M A O'Brien; S Dhesy-Thind; C Charles; M Hammond Mobilio; N B Leighl; E Grunfeld
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Adoption of Gene Expression Profiling for Breast Cancer in US Oncology Practice for Women Younger Than 65 Years.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Claudine Isaacs; Calvin Chao; Huei-Ting Tsai; Chunfu Liu; Bola F Ekezue; Nandini Selvam; Larry G Kessler; Marc D Schwartz; Tania Lobo; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Population-based study of the effect of gene expression profiling on adjuvant chemotherapy use in breast cancer patients under the age of 65 years.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Suzanne C O'Neill; Claudine Isaacs; Huei-Ting Tsai; Calvin Chao; Chunfu Liu; Bola F Ekezue; Nandini Selvam; Larry G Kessler; Yingjun Zhou; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Breast Cancers of Special Histologic Subtypes Are Biologically Diverse.

Authors:  Audree B Tadros; Hannah Y Wen; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Multilevel Influences on Patient-Oncologist Communication about Genomic Test Results: Oncologist Perspectives.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Kathryn L Taylor; Jonathan Clapp; Jinani Jayasekera; Claudine Isaacs; Deena Mary Atieh Graham; Stuart L Goldberg; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-08-21

8.  Question Prompt List to Support Patient-Provider Communication in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Test: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jinani Jayasekera; Susan T Vadaparampil; Susan Eggly; Richard L Street; Tanina Foster Moore; Claudine Isaacs; Hyo S Han; Bianca Augusto; Jennifer Garcia; Katherine Lopez; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-28

9.  Impact of Genomic Assay Testing and Clinical Factors on Chemotherapy Use After Implementation of Standardized Testing Criteria.

Authors:  Kelsey H Natsuhara; Katya Losk; Tari A King; Nancy U Lin; Kristen Camuso; Mehra Golshan; Stephen Pochebit; Jane E Brock; Craig A Bunnell; Rachel A Freedman
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-03

10.  Breast carcinoma with an Oncotype Dx recurrence score <18: Rate of distant metastases in a large series with clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Hannah Y Wen; Melissa Krystel-Whittemore; Sujata Patil; Fresia Pareja; Zenica L Bowser; Maura N Dickler; Larry Norton; Monica Morrow; Clifford A Hudis; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.