Literature DB >> 30076279

Impact of Genomic Assay Testing and Clinical Factors on Chemotherapy Use After Implementation of Standardized Testing Criteria.

Kelsey H Natsuhara1, Katya Losk2, Tari A King3, Nancy U Lin2, Kristen Camuso2, Mehra Golshan3, Stephen Pochebit4, Jane E Brock4, Craig A Bunnell2, Rachel A Freedman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For clinically appropriate early-stage breast cancer patients, reflex criteria for Oncotype DX ordering ("the intervention") were implemented at our comprehensive cancer center, which reduced time-to-adjuvant chemotherapy initiation. Our objective was to evaluate Oncotype DX ordering practices and chemotherapy use before and after implementation of the intervention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined medical records for 498 patients who had definitive breast cancer surgery at our center. The post-intervention cohort consisted of 232 consecutive patients who had Oncotype DX testing after reflex criteria implementation. This group was compared to a retrospective cohort of 266 patients who were diagnosed and treated prior to reflex criteria implementation, including patients who did and did not have Oncotype DX ordered. Factors associated with Oncotype DX ordering pre- and post-intervention were examined. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with chemotherapy receipt among patients with Oncotype DX testing.
RESULTS: The distribution of Oncotype DX scores, the proportion of those having Oncotype DX testing (28.9% vs. 34.1%) and those receiving chemotherapy (14.3% vs. 19.4%), did not significantly change between pre- and post-intervention groups. Age ≤65 years, stage II, grade 2, 1-3+ nodes, and tumor size >2 cm were associated with higher odds of Oncotype DX testing. Among patients having Oncotype DX testing, node status and Oncotype DX scores were significantly associated with chemotherapy receipt.
CONCLUSION: Our criteria for reflex Oncotype DX ordering appropriately targeted patients for whom Oncotype DX would typically be ordered by providers. No significant change in the rate of Oncotype DX ordering or chemotherapy use was observed after reflex testing implementation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study demonstrates that implementing multidisciplinary consensus reflex criteria for Oncotype DX ordering maintains a stable Oncotype DX ordering rate and chemotherapy rate, mirroring what was observed in a specific clinical practice, while decreasing treatment delays due to additional testing. These reflex criteria appropriately capture patients who would likely have had Oncotype DX ordered by their providers and for whom the test results are predicted to influence management. This intervention serves as a potential model for other large integrated, multidisciplinary oncology centers to institute processes targeting patient populations most likely to benefit from genomic assay testing, while mitigating treatment delays. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Genomic assays; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30076279      PMCID: PMC6516114          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  23 in total

1.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® versus current clinical practice from a Dutch cost perspective.

Authors:  Michelle Kip; Helma Monteban; Lotte Steuten
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 1.744

2.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Wait times for breast surgical operations, 2003-2011: a report from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Erik Liederbach; Mark Sisco; Chihsiung Wang; Catherine Pesce; Susan Sharpe; David J Winchester; Katharine Yao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Impacts of Early Guideline-Directed 21-Gene Recurrence Score Testing on Adjuvant Therapy Decision Making.

Authors:  Hannah Dzimitrowicz; Sarah Mougalian; Sherri Storms; Sandra Hurd; Anees B Chagpar; Brigid K Killelea; Nina R Horowitz; Donald R Lannin; Malini Harigopal; Erin Hofstatter; Michael P DiGiovanna; Kerin B Adelson; Andrea Silber; Maysa Abu-Khalaf; Gina Chung; Wajih Zaheer; Osama Abdelghany; Christos Hatzis; Lajos Pusztai; Tara B Sanft
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  A Validated Model for Identifying Patients Unlikely to Benefit From the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay.

Authors:  Michele M Gage; Martin Rosman; W Charles Mylander; Erica Giblin; Hyun-Seok Kim; Leslie Cope; Christopher Umbricht; Antonio C Wolff; Lorraine Tafra
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Invasive Breast Cancer Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  William J Gradishar; Benjamin O Anderson; Ron Balassanian; Sarah L Blair; Harold J Burstein; Amy Cyr; Anthony D Elias; William B Farrar; Andres Forero; Sharon Hermes Giordano; Matthew Goetz; Lori J Goldstein; Clifford A Hudis; Steven J Isakoff; P Kelly Marcom; Ingrid A Mayer; Beryl McCormick; Meena Moran; Sameer A Patel; Lori J Pierce; Elizabeth C Reed; Kilian E Salerno; Lee S Schwartzberg; Karen Lisa Smith; Mary Lou Smith; Hatem Soliman; George Somlo; Melinda Telli; John H Ward; Dorothy A Shead; Rashmi Kumar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lyndsay Harris; Herbert Fritsche; Robert Mennel; Larry Norton; Peter Ravdin; Sheila Taube; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Implementation of Surgeon-Initiated Gene Expression Profile Testing (Onco type DX) Among Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer to Reduce Delays in Chemotherapy Initiation.

Authors:  Katya Losk; Rachel A Freedman; Nancy U Lin; Mehra Golshan; Stephen M Pochebit; Susan C Lester; Kelsey Natsuhara; Kristen Camuso; Tari A King; Craig A Bunnell
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Adoption of gene expression profile testing and association with use of chemotherapy among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Samuel M Silver; Melissa E Hughes; Douglas W Blayney; Stephen B Edge; James G Herman; Clifford A Hudis; P Kelly Marcom; Jane E Pettinga; David Share; Richard Theriault; Yu-Ning Wong; Jonathan L Vandergrift; Joyce C Niland; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Wait times for breast cancer care.

Authors:  N Saint-Jacques; T Younis; R Dewar; D Rayson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Oncotype DX testing in node-positive breast cancer strongly impacts chemotherapy use at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Katya Losk; Rachel A Freedman; Alison Laws; Olga Kantor; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Zhenying Tan-Wasielewski; Lorenzo Trippa; Nancy U Lin; Eric P Winer; Tari A King
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on chemotherapy decision making and outcomes for breast cancer patients with four or more positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  Qing-Hong Zhang; Wen-Wen Zhang; Jun Wang; Chen-Lu Lian; Jia-Yuan Sun; Zhen-Yu He; San-Gang Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

3.  Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21-gene breast cancer recurrence score assay.

Authors:  Ronnie Zipkin; Andrew Schaefer; Mary Chamberlin; Tracy Onega; Alistair J O'Malley; Erika L Moen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Genomic Assays in Node Positive Breast Cancer Patients: A Review.

Authors:  Maroun Bou Zerdan; Maryam Ibrahim; Clara El Nakib; Rayan Hajjar; Hazem I Assi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  The impact of age and nodal status on variations in oncotype DX testing and adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Kathleen Iles; Mya L Roberson; Philip Spanheimer; Kristalyn Gallagher; David W Ollila; Paula D Strassle; Stephanie Downs-Canner
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 6.  Defining the Criteria for Reflex Testing for BRAF Mutations in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Sarah Zhou; Daniel Sikorski; Honghao Xu; Andrei Zubarev; May Chergui; François Lagacé; Wilson H Miller; Margaret Redpath; Stephanie Ghazal; Marcus O Butler; Teresa M Petrella; Joël Claveau; Carolyn Nessim; Thomas G Salopek; Robert Gniadecki; Ivan V Litvinov
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.