Literature DB >> 30130477

Multilevel Influences on Patient-Oncologist Communication about Genomic Test Results: Oncologist Perspectives.

Suzanne C O'Neill1, Kathryn L Taylor1, Jonathan Clapp1, Jinani Jayasekera1, Claudine Isaacs1, Deena Mary Atieh Graham2, Stuart L Goldberg3, Jeanne Mandelblatt1.   

Abstract

Thousands of women with early-stage breast cancer receive gene-expression profile (GEP) tests to guide chemotherapy decisions. However, many patients report a poor understanding of how their test results inform treatment decision-making. We applied models of patient-centered communication and informed decision-making to assess which variables oncologists' perceive as most influential to effective communication with their patients about GEP results and intervention modalities and approaches that could support more effective conversations about treatment decisions in routine clinical care. Medical oncologists who were part of a practice group in the mid-Atlantic US completed an online, cross-sectional survey in 2016. These data were merged with de-identified electronic patient and practice data. Of the 83 oncologists contacted, 29 completed the survey (35% response rate, representing 52% of the test-eligible patients in the practice network). There were no significant differences between survey responders and nonresponders. Oncologists reported patient-related variables as most influential, including performance status (65.5%), pretesting preferences for chemotherapy (55.2%), and comprehension of complex test results (55.2%). Oncologists endorsed their experience with testing (58.6%) and their own confidence in using the test results (48.3%) as influential as well. They indicated that a clinical decision support tool incorporating patient comorbidities, age, and potential benefits from chemotherapy would support their own practice and that they could share these results and other means of communication support using print materials (79.3%) with their patients in clinic (72.4%). These preferred intervention characteristics could be integrated into routine care, ultimately facilitating more effective communication about genomic testing (such as GEP) and its role in treatment selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30130477      PMCID: PMC6310162          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1506836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  38 in total

1.  Integrating next-generation sequencing into pediatric oncology practice: An assessment of physician confidence and understanding of clinical genomics.

Authors:  Liza-Marie Johnson; Jessica M Valdez; Emily A Quinn; April D Sykes; Rose B McGee; Regina Nuccio; Stacy J Hines-Dowell; Justin N Baker; Chimene Kesserwan; Kim E Nichols; Belinda N Mandrell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Adoption of Gene Expression Profiling for Breast Cancer in US Oncology Practice for Women Younger Than 65 Years.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Claudine Isaacs; Calvin Chao; Huei-Ting Tsai; Chunfu Liu; Bola F Ekezue; Nandini Selvam; Larry G Kessler; Marc D Schwartz; Tania Lobo; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Decisional control preferences among patients with advanced cancer: An international multicenter cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Sriram Yennurajalingam; Luis Fernando Rodrigues; Omar M Shamieh; Colombe Tricou; Marilène Filbet; Kyaw Naing; Akhileshwaran Ramaswamy; Pedro Emilio Perez-Cruz; Mary Jocylyn S Bautista; Sofia Bunge; Mary Ann Muckaden; Sarah Fakrooden; Vikash Sewram; Antonio Noguera Tejedor; Shobha S Rao; Janet L Williams; Diane D Liu; Minjeong Park; Zhanni Lu; Hilda Cantu; David Hui; Suresh K Reddy; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 4.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: modeling pathways from talk to outcome.

Authors:  Richard L Street
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-06-06

6.  Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations.

Authors:  D H Lea; K A Kaphingst; D Bowen; I Lipkus; D W Hadley
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Patients' reports of barriers to expressing concerns during cancer consultations.

Authors:  Kim Brandes; Annemiek J Linn; Edith G Smit; Julia C M van Weert
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-12-02

8.  Adolescent medical providers' willingness to recommend genetic susceptibility testing for nicotine addiction and lung cancer risk to adolescents.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; George Luta; Beth N Peshkin; Anisha Abraham; Leslie R Walker; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-08-07

9.  Cancer Incidence and Survival Trends by Subtype Using Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program, 1992-2013.

Authors:  Anne-Michelle Noone; Kathleen A Cronin; Sean F Altekruse; Nadia Howlader; Denise R Lewis; Valentina I Petkov; Lynne Penberthy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Adoption of gene expression profile testing and association with use of chemotherapy among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Samuel M Silver; Melissa E Hughes; Douglas W Blayney; Stephen B Edge; James G Herman; Clifford A Hudis; P Kelly Marcom; Jane E Pettinga; David Share; Richard Theriault; Yu-Ning Wong; Jonathan L Vandergrift; Joyce C Niland; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.