BACKGROUND: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) confer hypersensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of large-scale screening for EGFR mutations in such patients and analyzed the association between the mutations and the outcome of erlotinib treatment. METHODS: From April 2005 through November 2008, lung cancers from 2105 patients in 129 institutions in Spain were screened for EGFR mutations. The analysis was performed in a central laboratory. Patients with tumors carrying EGFR mutations were eligible for erlotinib treatment. RESULTS: EGFR mutations were found in 350 of 2105 patients (16.6%). Mutations were more frequent in women (69.7%), in patients who had never smoked (66.6%), and in those with adenocarcinomas (80.9%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The mutations were deletions in exon 19 (62.2%) and L858R (37.8%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival for 217 patients who received erlotinib were 14 months and 27 months, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios for the duration of progression-free survival were 2.94 for men (P<0.001); 1.92 for the presence of the L858R mutation, as compared with a deletion in exon 19 (P=0.02); and 1.68 for the presence of the L858R mutation in paired serum DNA, as compared with the absence of the mutation (P=0.02). The most common adverse events were mild rashes and diarrhea; grade 3 cutaneous toxic effects were recorded in 16 patients (7.4%) and grade 3 diarrhea in 8 patients (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Large-scale screening of patients with lung cancer for EGFR mutations is feasible and can have a role in decisions about treatment. 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
BACKGROUND: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) confer hypersensitivity to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of large-scale screening for EGFR mutations in such patients and analyzed the association between the mutations and the outcome of erlotinib treatment. METHODS: From April 2005 through November 2008, lung cancers from 2105 patients in 129 institutions in Spain were screened for EGFR mutations. The analysis was performed in a central laboratory. Patients with tumors carrying EGFR mutations were eligible for erlotinib treatment. RESULTS:EGFR mutations were found in 350 of 2105 patients (16.6%). Mutations were more frequent in women (69.7%), in patients who had never smoked (66.6%), and in those with adenocarcinomas (80.9%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The mutations were deletions in exon 19 (62.2%) and L858R (37.8%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival for 217 patients who received erlotinib were 14 months and 27 months, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios for the duration of progression-free survival were 2.94 for men (P<0.001); 1.92 for the presence of the L858R mutation, as compared with a deletion in exon 19 (P=0.02); and 1.68 for the presence of the L858R mutation in paired serum DNA, as compared with the absence of the mutation (P=0.02). The most common adverse events were mild rashes and diarrhea; grade 3 cutaneous toxic effects were recorded in 16 patients (7.4%) and grade 3 diarrhea in 8 patients (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Large-scale screening of patients with lung cancer for EGFR mutations is feasible and can have a role in decisions about treatment. 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: Alan P Venook; Maria E Arcila; Al B Benson; Donald A Berry; David Ross Camidge; Robert W Carlson; Toni K Choueiri; Valerie Guild; Gregory P Kalemkerian; Razelle Kurzrock; Christine M Lovly; Amy E McKee; Robert J Morgan; Anthony J Olszanski; Mary W Redman; Vered Stearns; Joan McClure; Marian L Birkeland Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Rex Chin Wei Yung; Susan Otell; Peter Illei; Douglas P Clark; David Feller-Kopman; Lonny Yarmus; Frederic Askin; Edward Gabrielson; Qing Kay Li Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Martin L Sos; Felix Dietlein; Martin Peifer; Jakob Schöttle; Hyatt Balke-Want; Christian Müller; Mirjam Koker; André Richters; Stefanie Heynck; Florian Malchers; Johannes M Heuckmann; Danila Seidel; Patrick A Eyers; Roland T Ullrich; Andrey P Antonchick; Viktor V Vintonyak; Peter M Schneider; Takashi Ninomiya; Herbert Waldmann; Reinhard Büttner; Daniel Rauh; Lukas C Heukamp; Roman K Thomas Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Beau-Faller; N Prim; A-M Ruppert; I Nanni-Metéllus; R Lacave; L Lacroix; F Escande; S Lizard; J-L Pretet; I Rouquette; P de Crémoux; J Solassol; F de Fraipont; I Bièche; A Cayre; E Favre-Guillevin; P Tomasini; M Wislez; B Besse; M Legrain; A-C Voegeli; L Baudrin; F Morin; G Zalcman; E Quoix; H Blons; J Cadranel Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Geoffrey R Oxnard; Peter C Lo; Mizuki Nishino; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Neal I Lindeman; Mohit Butaney; David M Jackman; Bruce E Johnson; Pasi A Jänne Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 15.609