Literature DB >> 22584767

Outcomes and predictors of difficulty with coronary sinus lead removal.

Seth Sheldon1, Paul A Friedman, David L Hayes, Michael J Osborn, Yong-Mei Cha, Robert F Rea, Samuel J Asirvatham.   

Abstract

With increasing coronary sinus (CS) pacemaker leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy, the need to remove these leads has risen. The purpose of this study is to describe a single center's experience with CS lead removal and to attempt to identify predictors of difficulty with lead removal and complications. We reviewed all percutaneous endocardial CS lead removals performed at our institution through February 2010. Successful removal with traction alone was considered simple while complex extractions required traction devices and/or laser sheaths. Between December 1996 and February 2010, 125 CS leads were percutaneously removed ≥1 week post-implantation from 115 patients. One attempt at CS lead extraction was unsuccessful. The average duration since implantation for the CS leads was 1.54 years (± .75 years, range 8 days to 8.24 years). The majority of the leads were removed by simple traction (n = 114, 91.2 %). The remainder were removed by femoral approach with snare (n = 3, 2.4 %), locking stylet (n = 2, 1.6 %), or locking stylet and laser sheath (n = 6, 4.8 %). Half of CS leads in place greater than 4 years required complex extraction (n = 7/14, 50 %). CS complications (n = 11 patients, 8.8 %) included CS or tributary thrombosis (n = 7/102, 6.9 %) and CS dissection (n = 4/102, 3.9 %). Major non-CS complications (n = 2 patients, 1.6 %) included a cardiac tear requiring pericardiocentesis and thoracotomy (n = 1, 0.8 %) and subclavian vein tear requiring surgical repair (n = 1, 0.8 %). Minor non-CS complications (n = 9 patients, 7.2 %) included a pneumothorax (n = 1, 0.8 %), hematoma (n = 2, 1.6 %), subclavian vein thrombosis (n = 3, x%), and blood transfusion (n = 5, 4.0 %). A longer duration since implantation and larger lead diameter were associated with complex versus simple removal (p < .0001 and p = .0009 respectively). Percutaneous CS lead removal is successful by simple traction alone in the vast majority of cases. CS leads in place greater than 4 years, however, often require complex extraction. Specific extraction techniques can be implemented when simple traction is unsuccessful without an appreciable increase in complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22584767     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-012-9685-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  17 in total

1.  Correlative anatomy for the electrophysiologist, part II: cardiac ganglia, phrenic nerve, coronary venous system.

Authors:  Nirusha Lachman; Faisal F Syed; Ammar Habib; Suraj Kapa; Susan E Bisco; K L Venkatachalam; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-08-30

2.  Coronary sinus lead extraction in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy: single center experience.

Authors:  Babak Kasravi; Serge Tobias; Mary J Barnes; John C Messenger
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Intravascular lead extraction using locking stylets and sheaths.

Authors:  C L Byrd; S J Schwartz; N B Hedin; L B Goode; N E Fearnot; H J Smith
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Extraction of chronic pacemaker and defibrillator leads from the coronary sinus: laser infrequently used but required.

Authors:  Shoaib Hamid; Aruna Arujuna; Aruna Arujna; Sitara Khan; Andrew Ladwiniec; Mark McPhail; Julian Bostock; Margaret Mobb; Nik Patel; Cliff Bucknall; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Transvenous lead extraction: Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management: this document was endorsed by the American Heart Association (AHA).

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Charles J Love; Charles L Byrd; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Roger G Carrillo; George H Crossley; Laurence M Epstein; Richard A Friedman; Charles E H Kennergren; Przemyslaw Mitkowski; Raymond H M Schaerf; Oussama M Wazni
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Percutaneous lead and system extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices and coronary sinus leads.

Authors:  Steven E Williams; Aruna Arujuna; John Whitaker; Anoop K Shetty; Julian Bostock; Nikhil Patel; Margaret Mobb; Mike Cooklin; Jaswinder Gill; Christopher Blauth; Cliff Bucknall; Shoaib Hamid; C Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Extraction of old pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator leads by laser sheath versus femoral approach.

Authors:  Pierre Bordachar; Pascal Defaye; Eric Peyrouse; Serge Boveda; Bilel Mokrani; Christelle Marquié; Laurent Barandon; Emilie Marcant Fossaert; Stephane Garrigue; Sylvain Reuter; Julien Laborderie; Eloi Marijon; Jean-Claude Deharo; Peggy Jacon; Salem Kacet; Sylvain Ploux; Antoine Deplagne; Michel Haissaguerre; Jacques Clementy; Philippe Ritter; Didier Klug
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-06-19

8.  Chronic performance of an active fixation coronary sinus lead.

Authors:  George H Crossley; Derek Exner; R Hardwin Mead; Robert A Sorrentino; Robert Hokanson; Shelby Li; Stuart Adler
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Large, single-center, single-operator experience with transvenous lead extraction: outcomes and changing indications.

Authors:  Samuel O Jones; Robert E Eckart; Christine M Albert; Laurence M Epstein
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Contributions of advanced techniques to the success and safety of transvenous leads extraction.

Authors:  Eloi Marijon; Serge Boveda; Maxime De Guillebon; Sophie Jacob; Olivier Vahdat; Laurent Barandon; Nicolas Combes; Laurent Sidobre; Jean-Paul Albenque; Jacques Clémenty; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Laser sheath extraction of an infected pacemaker lead].

Authors:  Hamdi ElFarra; Rainer Moosdorf; Thomas Kratz; Wolfram Grimm
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-06-14

2.  Safety and Effectiveness of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Infected Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Is It More Risky than Extraction of Other Systems?

Authors:  Paweł Stefańczyk; Dorota Nowosielecka; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Wojciech Jacheć; Ewa Lewicka; Andrzej Tomaszewski; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  First experience in quadripolar active fixation coronary sinus lead extraction: a case report.

Authors:  Elhosseyn Guella; Michael Brack; Khalid Abozguia; Christopher John Cassidy
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-22

4.  Unexpected challenging case of coronary sinus lead extraction.

Authors:  Luca Bontempi; Donatella Tempio; Raffaella De Vito; Manuel Cerini; Francesca Salghetti; Niccolò Dasseni; Clara Villa; Abdallah Raweh; Lorenza Inama; Francesca Vassanelli; Mario Luzi; Antonio Curnis
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Safety and effectiveness of coronary sinus leads extraction - single high-volume centre experience.

Authors:  Andrzej W Kutarski; Wojciech Jacheć; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Wojciech Borzęcki; Dorota Nowosielecka; Marek Czajkowski; Maciej Polewczyk; Anna Polewczyk
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.426

6.  Hybrid transvenous and surgical approach for the extraction of coronary sinus leads: A case series.

Authors:  Ashraf Ahmed; Gianmarco Arabia; Luca Bontempi; Manuel Cerini; Francesca Salghetti; Claudio Muneretto; Gianfranco Mitacchione; Antonino Milidoni; Antonio Curnis
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 1.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.