Literature DB >> 19168497

Extraction of chronic pacemaker and defibrillator leads from the coronary sinus: laser infrequently used but required.

Shoaib Hamid1, Aruna Arujuna, Aruna Arujna, Sitara Khan, Andrew Ladwiniec, Mark McPhail, Julian Bostock, Margaret Mobb, Nik Patel, Cliff Bucknall, Christopher A Rinaldi.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an accepted treatment for heart failure but it may be necessary to explant these systems along with their leads. The evidence base for coronary sinus (CS) lead extractions is limited. We aimed to evaluate the percutaneous removal of these leads and the utility of laser extraction when necessary. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Of 265 patients referred for lead extraction between January 2004 and June 2008, 32 (12.1%) involved CS leads (30 males, mean age 67 years). Mean implantation time was 26.5 +/- 28.7 months (range 1-116 months). Indications for extraction were pocket infection (34.4%), lead malfunction (43.8%), skin erosion (15.6%), and endocarditis (6.2%). Twenty-eight (87.5%) CS leads were removed with manual traction, with laser utilized in four cases (12.5%). No major complications of CS laceration, pericardial effusion, emergency surgery, or death occurred.
CONCLUSION: Our experience supports the percutaneous extraction of CS leads as a safe and effective procedure including the utility of laser when necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19168497     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eun374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  6 in total

1.  Outcomes and predictors of difficulty with coronary sinus lead removal.

Authors:  Seth Sheldon; Paul A Friedman; David L Hayes; Michael J Osborn; Yong-Mei Cha; Robert F Rea; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Extraction of implantable cardiac electronic devices.

Authors:  John Rickard; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Editorial: What makes transvenous extraction more difficult?

Authors:  Hideo Okamura
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2015-12-04

4.  Safety and effectiveness of coronary sinus leads extraction - single high-volume centre experience.

Authors:  Andrzej W Kutarski; Wojciech Jacheć; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Wojciech Borzęcki; Dorota Nowosielecka; Marek Czajkowski; Maciej Polewczyk; Anna Polewczyk
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.426

5.  Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Adhesive Thrombo-Fibrotic Lead Encapsulations (TFLE) of Pacemaker and ICD Leads in Arrhythmia Patients-A Post Mortem Study.

Authors:  Jonas Keiler; Marko Schulze; Ronja Dreger; Armin Springer; Alper Öner; Andreas Wree
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-11-30

6.  Coronary Sinus Lead Removal: A Comparison between Active and Passive Fixation Leads.

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Charles Kennergren; Yalin Yildirim; Nils Gosau; Ali Aydin; Stephan Willems; Hendrik Treede; Hermann Reichenspurner; Samer Hakmi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.