Literature DB >> 21671952

Percutaneous lead and system extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices and coronary sinus leads.

Steven E Williams1, Aruna Arujuna, John Whitaker, Anoop K Shetty, Julian Bostock, Nikhil Patel, Margaret Mobb, Mike Cooklin, Jaswinder Gill, Christopher Blauth, Cliff Bucknall, Shoaib Hamid, C Aldo Rinaldi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device and coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction is required due to the occurrence of system infection, malfunction, or upgrade. Published series of CS lead extraction are limited by small sample sizes. We present a 10-year experience of CRT device and CS lead extraction.
METHODS: All lead extractions between 2000 and 2010 were entered into a computer database. From these, a cohort of 71 cases involving a CRT device or CS lead was analyzed for procedural method, success, and complications.
RESULTS: Sixty coronary sinus leads were extracted in 71 cases (median age 71 years; 90% male) by manual traction/locking stylets (n = 54) or using a laser sheath (n = 6). Procedural success was achieved in 98% of CS leads. A total of 143 non-CS leads were extracted, with laser required in 46% of cases. The mean duration of lead implantation was 35.8 months (range 1-116 months) and 2.86 ± 1.07 leads were extracted per case. CRT extraction case load increased significantly over time. Minor complications occurred in four (5.6%) cases and major complications in one (1.4%) case. There were no intraprocedural deaths, but two deaths occurred within 30 days of extraction.
CONCLUSIONS: Our 10-year experience confirms that percutaneous removal of CS leads can be achieved with high procedural success. Our recorded complication rates are no higher than those of non-CS lead extraction series, and should be taken in the context of the frail nature of CRT patients. Ongoing audit of procedure success and complications will be required to further guide best practice in CS lead extraction. ©2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21671952     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03149.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  9 in total

1.  Outcomes and predictors of difficulty with coronary sinus lead removal.

Authors:  Seth Sheldon; Paul A Friedman; David L Hayes; Michael J Osborn; Yong-Mei Cha; Robert F Rea; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Starfix lead extraction: Clinical experience and technical issues.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Golzio; Ilaria Meynet; Fulvio Orzan; Elisa Pellissero; Davide Castagno; Federico Ferraris; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2015-11-14

3.  Safety and Effectiveness of Transvenous Lead Extraction in Patients with Infected Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Is It More Risky than Extraction of Other Systems?

Authors:  Paweł Stefańczyk; Dorota Nowosielecka; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Wojciech Jacheć; Ewa Lewicka; Andrzej Tomaszewski; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  Active fixation mechanism complicates coronary sinus lead extraction and limits subsequent reimplantation targets.

Authors:  E M Cronin; C P Ingelmo; J Rickard; O M Wazni; D O Martin; B L Wilkoff; B Baranowski
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  First experience in quadripolar active fixation coronary sinus lead extraction: a case report.

Authors:  Elhosseyn Guella; Michael Brack; Khalid Abozguia; Christopher John Cassidy
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-22

6.  Safety and effectiveness of coronary sinus leads extraction - single high-volume centre experience.

Authors:  Andrzej W Kutarski; Wojciech Jacheć; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Wojciech Borzęcki; Dorota Nowosielecka; Marek Czajkowski; Maciej Polewczyk; Anna Polewczyk
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.426

7.  Assessing long-term survival and hospitalization following transvenous lead extraction in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Vishal S Mehta; Hugh O'Brien; Mark K Elliott; Baldeep S Sidhu; Justin Gould; Anoop K Shetty; Steven Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-10-30

8.  Hybrid transvenous and surgical approach for the extraction of coronary sinus leads: A case series.

Authors:  Ashraf Ahmed; Gianmarco Arabia; Luca Bontempi; Manuel Cerini; Francesca Salghetti; Claudio Muneretto; Gianfranco Mitacchione; Antonino Milidoni; Antonio Curnis
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Coronary Sinus Lead Removal: A Comparison between Active and Passive Fixation Leads.

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Charles Kennergren; Yalin Yildirim; Nils Gosau; Ali Aydin; Stephan Willems; Hendrik Treede; Hermann Reichenspurner; Samer Hakmi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.