Literature DB >> 12521493

The effects of prenatal group genetic counselling on knowledge, anxiety and decisional conflict: issues for nuchal translucency screening.

Amy S Kaiser1, Lorraine E Ferris, Anne L Pastuszak, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Jo-Ann Johnson, Susan Conacher, B F Shaw.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of prenatal genetic group counselling on women's anxiety, decisional conflict and levels of knowledge. Participants (N=271) were aged 35 years and older. ANOVA results indicated that pre/postcounselling scores for anxiety did not change significantly, while decisional conflict decreased significantly (P<0.001). Pre/postcounselling scores on two different knowledge measures were analysed using 2x3 mixed ANOVAs for time by highest level of education and by having discussed prenatal diagnosis with one's health care provider. No potential interactions were statistically significant; time alone had a strong significant effect for both knowledge measures (P<0.01); P<0.01, respectively), suggesting that the effects of the counselling intervention were robust. Group genetic counselling is an effective method for education and decision support in the prenatal context, and may serve as a model for other clinical populations facing genetic screening decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12521493     DOI: 10.1080/01443610220130508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  7 in total

1.  Invasive prenatal testing decisions in pregnancy after infertility.

Authors:  Colleen Caleshu; Shoshana Shiloh; Cristofer Price; Julie Sapp; Barbara Biesecker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Grace Ames; Sylvia Ann Metcalfe; Alison Dalton Archibald; Rony Emily Duncan; Jon Emery
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.

Authors:  Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Sarah M Jenkins; Erica J Sutton; Caroline Horrow; Iftikhar J Kullo; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  It's complicated - Factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Cécile Muller; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Report from the National Society of Genetic Counselors service delivery model task force: a proposal to define models, components, and modes of referral.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Shanna L Gustafson; Monica L Marvin; Bronson D Riley; Wendy R Uhlmann; S Bonnie Liebers; Julie A Rousseau
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Effect of Shared Decision-making on Anxiety of Women Recommended for Prenatal Screening Tests in Southeast of Iran.

Authors:  Zahra Moudi; Raheleh Jam; Hossein Ansari; Mostafa Montazer Zohour
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2020-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.