Literature DB >> 22562479

Visual and optical performance and quality of life after implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens.

Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí1, Francisco J Blanes-Mompó, Santiago García-Lázaro, David P Piñero, Alejandro Cerviño, Rune Brautaset.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual, optical, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes and intercorrelations after bilateral implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses.
METHODS: Twenty eyes with high to moderate myopia of 10 patients that underwent PRL implantation (Phakic Refractive Lens, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) were examined. Refraction, visual acuity, photopic and low mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) with and without glare, ocular aberrations, as well as QoL outcomes (National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument-42, NEI RQL-42) were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Significant improvement in uncorrected (UDVA) and best-corrected distance (CDVA) visual acuities were found postoperatively (p < 0.01), with significant reduction in spherical equivalent (p < 0.01). Low mesopic CS without glare was significantly better than measurements with glare for 1.5, 3, and 6 cycles/degree (p < 0.01). No significant correlations between higher order root mean square (RMS) with CDVA (r = -0.26, p = 0.27) and CS (r ≤ 0.45, p ≥ 0.05) were found. Postoperative binocular photopic CS for 12 cycles/degree and 18 cycles/degree correlated significantly with several RQL-42 scales. Glare index correlated significantly with CS measures and scotopic pupil size (r = -0.551, p = 0.04), but not with higher order RMS (r = -0.02, p = 0.94). Postoperative higher order RMS, postoperative primary coma and postoperative spherical aberration was significant higher for 5-mm pupil diameter (p < 0.01) compared with controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Correction of moderate to high myopia by means of PRL implantation had a positive impact on CS and QoL. The aberrometric increase induced by the surgery does not seem to limit CS and QoL. However, perception of glare is still a relevant disturbance in some cases possibly related to the limitation of the optical zone of the PRL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22562479     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2041-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  36 in total

1.  Medium-term visual, refractive, and intraocular stability after implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens to correct moderate to high myopia.

Authors:  Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; David P Piñero; David Madrid-Costa; Francisco J Blanes-Mompó; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Alejandro Cerviño
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lenses to correct myopia: five-year follow-up.

Authors:  José F Alfonso; Begoña Baamonde; Luis Fernández-Vega; Paulo Fernandes; Jose M González-Méijome; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Comparison of contrast sensitivity after angle-supported, iris-fixated and posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for high myopia.

Authors:  Ayong Yu; Qinmei Wang; Anquan Xue; Shuangqian Zhu; Shulin Wang; Yunyun Chen; Jin Sun
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Phakic refractive lens (Medennium) for correction of +4.00 to +6.00 diopters: 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Raquel Gil-Cazorla; Miguel A Teus; Esther Arranz-Marquez; Celeste Marina-Verde
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Higher-order aberration changes after Implantable Collamer Lens implantation for myopia.

Authors:  Sun Woong Kim; Hun Yang; Geunyoung Yoon; Yong Jun Lee; Mi-Na Kweon; Jin Kook Kim; Kyoung Yul Seo
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Quality of life in high myopia before and after implantable Collamer lens implantation.

Authors:  Alvin Ieong; Scott C H Hau; Gary S Rubin; Bruce D S Allan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Optical quality one month after verisyse and Veriflex phakic IOL implantation and Zeiss MEL 80 LASIK for myopia from 5.00 to 16.50 diopters.

Authors:  Meritxell Vilaseca; Adenay Padilla; Jaume Pujol; Juan C Ondategui; Pablo Artal; Jose L Güell
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Influence of optic quality on contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in eyes with a rigid or flexible phakic intraocular lens.

Authors:  Cristina Peris-Martínez; José M Artigas; Isaias Sánchez-Cortina; Adelina Felipe; Amparo Díez-Ajenjo; José L Menezo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Three-year results of Artisan/Verisyse phakic intraocular lens implantation. Results of the United States Food And Drug Administration clinical trial.

Authors:  R Doyle Stulting; Maurice E John; Robert K Maloney; Kerry K Assil; Peter N Arrowsmith; Vance M Thompson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Clinical ocular wavefront analyzers.

Authors:  Alejandro Cerviño; Sarah L Hosking; Robert Montes-Mico; Keith Bates
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  2 in total

1.  Optical quality after posterior chamber Phakic implantation of an intraocular Lens with a central hole (V4c implantable Collamer Lens) under different lighting conditions.

Authors:  Tianrui He; Yi Zhu; Jibo Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  Five Years Follow-Up of Acrysof Cachet® Angle-Supported Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation for Myopia Correction.

Authors:  Aytan Musayeva; Jana C Riedl; Adrian Gericke; Urs Vossmerbaeumer
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 1.909

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.