Literature DB >> 21930045

Medium-term visual, refractive, and intraocular stability after implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens to correct moderate to high myopia.

Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí1, David P Piñero, David Madrid-Costa, Francisco J Blanes-Mompó, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Alejandro Cerviño.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the medium-term refractive and visual outcomes and the complications after implantation of a silicone posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (PC pIOL) for moderate to high myopia.
SETTING: Oftalmar, Medimar International Hospital, Alicante, Spain.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, refraction, and intraocular pressure were evaluated during a medium-term follow-up. Postoperative complications were also studied.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 35 eyes (mean preoperative spherical equivalent [SE] -10.25 diopters [D] ± 3.19 [SD]) of 20 patients with a mean age of 31.83 ± 8.87 years and a mean follow-up of 57.34 ± 9.24 months. The mean UDVA improved from 2.40 ± 0.20 logMAR preoperatively to 0.08 ± 0.13 logMAR at the last postoperative visit (P<.01). The mean CDVA improved from 0.11 ± 0.09 logMAR to 0.02 ± 0.09 logMAR, respectively (P<.01). The postoperative CDVA was 0.1 or better in 30 eyes (85.71%), with 22 eyes (62.86%) gaining lines of CDVA. The final efficacy index was 1.16 and the final safety index, 1.26. Regarding predictability, 34 eyes (97.14%) had an SE within ± 1.00 D and 33 eyes (94.28%) within ± 0.50 D. The complications were PC pIOL decentration (2 eyes, 5.71%), cortical lens opacification (1 eye, 2.86%), and retinal detachment (1 eye, 2.86%).
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of a PC pIOL to correct moderate to high myopia was efficient and predictable in the medium term, with intraocular stability in most cases. New designs and criteria for PC pIOL size selection should be developed. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21930045     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

Review 1.  The posterior chamber phakic refractive lens (PRL): a review.

Authors:  R J Pérez-Cambrodí; D P Piñero; T Ferrer-Blasco; A Cerviño; R Brautaset
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Visual and optical performance and quality of life after implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens.

Authors:  Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; Francisco J Blanes-Mompó; Santiago García-Lázaro; David P Piñero; Alejandro Cerviño; Rune Brautaset
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Phakic intraocular lenses: An overview.

Authors:  Soraya M R Jonker; Tos T J M Berendschot; Isabelle E Y Saelens; Noël J C Bauer; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Refractive Results and Endothelial Cell Density After Eyecryl Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Ufuk Urdem; Alper Agca
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2019-02-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.