PURPOSE: To determine whether the difference in optic quality between 2 types of phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) affects visual quality. SETTING: Fundación Oftalmológica del Mediterráneo, Valencia, Spain. METHODS: Before implantation of a pIOL for myopia, all eyes had an examination including corrected (CDVA) and uncorrected (UDVA) distance visual acuity testing, corneal endothelial cell count (ECC), and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. The postoperative outcomes, determined at least 1 year after surgery, were CDVA; UDVA; contrast sensitivity function under photopic, mesopic, and mesopic with glare conditions; ECC; IOP; keratometry (Scheimpflug photography); and total ocular aberration (Hartmann-Shack aberrometry). RESULTS: Twelve eyes had implantation of an Artisan pIOL (rigid pIOL group) and 18 eyes, of an Artiflex pIOL (flexible pIOL group). The mean preoperative CDVA was 0.04 logMAR +/- 0.01 (SD) in both groups (P>.5). The mean postoperative CDVA was 0.01 +/- 0.02 logMAR in the rigid IOL group and 0.01 +/- 0.06 logMAR in the flexible IOL group (P>.9). The photopic contrast sensitivity function was better with the rigid pIOL, and the mesopic contrast sensitivity function was slightly better with the flexible pIOL; however, neither difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Optic quality, measured by modulation transfer function and evaluated by average modulation, was approximately 13% better with the rigid pIOL than with the flexible pIOL. However, the difference was not enough to affect visual quality. At 1 year, the 2 groups had similar CDVA and contrast sensitivity function values, indicating that other optical or neural factors compensate for differences in optic quality.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the difference in optic quality between 2 types of phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) affects visual quality. SETTING: Fundación Oftalmológica del Mediterráneo, Valencia, Spain. METHODS: Before implantation of a pIOL for myopia, all eyes had an examination including corrected (CDVA) and uncorrected (UDVA) distance visual acuity testing, corneal endothelial cell count (ECC), and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. The postoperative outcomes, determined at least 1 year after surgery, were CDVA; UDVA; contrast sensitivity function under photopic, mesopic, and mesopic with glare conditions; ECC; IOP; keratometry (Scheimpflug photography); and total ocular aberration (Hartmann-Shack aberrometry). RESULTS: Twelve eyes had implantation of an Artisan pIOL (rigid pIOL group) and 18 eyes, of an Artiflex pIOL (flexible pIOL group). The mean preoperative CDVA was 0.04 logMAR +/- 0.01 (SD) in both groups (P>.5). The mean postoperative CDVA was 0.01 +/- 0.02 logMAR in the rigid IOL group and 0.01 +/- 0.06 logMAR in the flexible IOL group (P>.9). The photopic contrast sensitivity function was better with the rigid pIOL, and the mesopic contrast sensitivity function was slightly better with the flexible pIOL; however, neither difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Optic quality, measured by modulation transfer function and evaluated by average modulation, was approximately 13% better with the rigid pIOL than with the flexible pIOL. However, the difference was not enough to affect visual quality. At 1 year, the 2 groups had similar CDVA and contrast sensitivity function values, indicating that other optical or neural factors compensate for differences in optic quality.
Authors: José M Artigas; M Carmen García-Domene; Amparo Navea; Pablo Botella; Eduardo Fernández Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.732