OBJECTIVES: Reports have suggested that a reduction in tumour 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) examination during or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict pathological response in oesophageal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether metabolic response predicts pathological response to a standardised neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen within a prospective clinical trial. METHODS: Consecutive patients staged with potentially curable oesophageal cancer who underwent treatment within a non-randomised clinical trial were included. A standardised chemotherapy regimen (two cycles of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil) was used. PET/CT was performed before chemotherapy and repeated 24-28 days after the start of cycle 2. RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects were included: mean age 65 years; 37 male. Using the median percentage reduction in SUV(max) (42%) to define metabolic response, pathological response was seen in 71% of metabolic responders (17/24) compared with 33% of non-responders (8/24; P = 0.009, sensitivity 68%, specificity 70%). Pathological response was seen in 81% of subjects with a complete metabolic response (13/16) compared with 38% of those with a less than complete response (12/32; P = 0.0042, sensitivity 52%, specificity 87%). There was no significant histology-based effect. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant association between metabolic response and pathological response; however, accuracy in predicting pathological response was relatively low.
OBJECTIVES: Reports have suggested that a reduction in tumour 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) examination during or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may predict pathological response in oesophageal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether metabolic response predicts pathological response to a standardised neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen within a prospective clinical trial. METHODS: Consecutive patients staged with potentially curable oesophageal cancer who underwent treatment within a non-randomised clinical trial were included. A standardised chemotherapy regimen (two cycles of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil) was used. PET/CT was performed before chemotherapy and repeated 24-28 days after the start of cycle 2. RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects were included: mean age 65 years; 37 male. Using the median percentage reduction in SUV(max) (42%) to define metabolic response, pathological response was seen in 71% of metabolic responders (17/24) compared with 33% of non-responders (8/24; P = 0.009, sensitivity 68%, specificity 70%). Pathological response was seen in 81% of subjects with a complete metabolic response (13/16) compared with 38% of those with a less than complete response (12/32; P = 0.0042, sensitivity 52%, specificity 87%). There was no significant histology-based effect. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant association between metabolic response and pathological response; however, accuracy in predicting pathological response was relatively low.
Authors: Henderik L van Westreenen; John T M Plukker; David C P Cobben; Carolien J M Verhoogt; Henk Groen; Pieter L Jager Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: W A Weber; K Ott; K Becker; H J Dittler; H Helmberger; N E Avril; G Meisetschläger; R Busch; J R Siewert; M Schwaiger; U Fink Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Johannes B Roedl; Rivka R Colen; Nagaraj S Holalkere; Alan J Fischman; Noah C Choi; Michael A Blake Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Jeffrey L Port; Paul C Lee; Robert J Korst; Yaakov Liss; Danish Meherally; Paul Christos; Madhu Mazumdar; Nasser K Altorki Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Wilson W L Li; Wim Jan P van Boven; Jouke T Annema; Susanne Eberl; Houke M Klomp; Bas A J M de Mol Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Milly Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler; Robert Wolff; Marie Westwood; Brigitta Baumert; Stefan Lange Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: John M Findlay; Richard S Gillies; James M Franklin; Eugene J Teoh; Greg E Jones; Sara di Carlo; Fergus V Gleeson; Nicholas D Maynard; Kevin M Bradley; Mark R Middleton Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephen S F Yip; Thibaud P Coroller; Nina N Sanford; Harvey Mamon; Hugo J W L Aerts; Ross I Berbeco Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 6.244