Literature DB >> 17643605

Positron emission tomographic scanning predicts survival after induction chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma.

Jeffrey L Port1, Paul C Lee, Robert J Korst, Yaakov Liss, Danish Meherally, Paul Christos, Madhu Mazumdar, Nasser K Altorki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately predict clinical and pathological response and survival in patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy may have a significant impact on treatment strategy for esophageal carcinoma. This study assessed the predictive accuracy of clinical response (CR) and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in determining pathological downstaging and disease free survival (DFS) after chemotherapy.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent chemotherapy prior to complete surgical resection for esophageal carcinoma between 1999 and 2005. Clinical response was correlated with pathological downstaging and survival. For PET scanning, the percent reduction in maxSUV after induction therapy was determined and we identified the optimal threshold of percent reduction in maxSUV for predicting clinical response and pathological downstaging.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (52 men, median age 62.3) were evaluated. Thirty-nine patients (62.9%) had either a partial (n = 32) or complete clinical response (n = 7) to induction therapy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of an objective clinical response in predicting downstaging in T and (or) N were 85.7%, 55.9%, 61.5%, and 82.6%, respectively. There was no difference in DFS between responders and nonresponders. The PET sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for predicting pathologic downstaging were 77.8%, 52.9%, 56.8%, and 75%, respectively. Thirty-seven patients (59.7%) had a 50% or greater reduction in the maxSUV of their primary tumor and had a significant improvement in DFS compared with patients with a less than 50% reduction in maxSUV (median DFS time: 35.5 months vs 17.9 months, respectively, p = 0.03). Significantly, 11 patients had a 100% reduction in maxSUV despite the presence of residual tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: Complete response and PET appear equivalent in predicting pathological downstaging. However, a 50% reduction in the maxSUV after induction therapy is more significantly associated with improved DFS than CR or pathological downstaging. Additionally, a complete absence of PET signal cannot be equated with a complete pathological response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17643605     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  17 in total

1.  Symptomatic cardiac toxicity is predicted by dosimetric and patient factors rather than changes in 18F-FDG PET determination of myocardial activity after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Michael Christensen; Jonathan D Cheng; Jian Q Yu; Kevin Crawford; Oleh Haluszka; Jeffrey Tokar; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Alan Maurer; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Biological imaging in the assessment of neoadjuvant treatment response in esophageal cancer: a new era?

Authors:  John Th Plukker
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11

Review 3.  A systematic review of the predictive value of (18)FDG-PET in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the survival outcome stratification.

Authors:  Pascaline Schollaert; Ralph Crott; Claude Bertrand; Lionel D'Hondt; Thierry Vander Borght; Bruno Krug
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Positron Emission Tomography's Utility in Esophageal Cancer Management.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Gary Y Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  [Importance of PET in surgery of esophageal cancer].

Authors:  K Ott; T Schmidt; F Lordick; K Herrmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Personalized therapy based on image for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuto Harada; Dilsa Mizrak Kaya; Anthony Lopez; Hideo Baba; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

7.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the prediction of survival in patients with advanced esophageal cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Masahiko Yano; Hiroshi Miyata; Keijiro Sugimura; Masaaki Motoori; Takeshi Omori; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Masayoshi Yasui; Masayuki Ohue; Hirofumi Akita; Akira Tomokuni; Hidenori Takahashi; Shogo Kobayashi; Masato Sakon
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-10

Review 8.  The role of FDG-PET and staging laparoscopy in the management of patients with cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Harry H Yoon; Val J Lowe; Stephen D Cassivi; Yvonne Romero
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 9.  [Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: pre-operative combined radiochemotherapy from a surgical oncological viewpoint].

Authors:  B L D M Brücher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Metabolic response at repeat PET/CT predicts pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  R S Gillies; M R Middleton; C Blesing; K Patel; N Warner; R E K Marshall; N D Maynard; K M Bradley; F V Gleeson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.