Robert J Cerfolio1, Ayesha S Bryant. 1. Division of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294, USA. rcerfolio@uab.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The stage of esophageal cancer is currently determined by the anatomic TNM classification system as opposed to information about tumor biology. METHODS: A retrospective review was made of a prospective electronic database. Patients had esophageal cancer, dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) and maximum standardized uptake value (maxSUV) measured. Biopsies were obtained from suspicious nodal and systemic locations, and when indicated, resection with complete lymphadenectomy was performed. RESULTS: There were 89 patients (53 men). The median maxSUV for patients with high grade dysplasia, stage I, IIa, IIb, III, and IVa esophageal cancer was 1.7, 2.9, 8.9, 7.7, 9.5, and 12, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed patients with a high maxSUV were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumors (risk ratio 1.89, p = 0.032) and advanced stage (risk ratio 2.6, p < 0.001). The maxSUV correlated better (r(2) = 0.85) than the current TNM staging system for survival (r(2) = 0.68). Receiving operator characteristics curve demonstrated a maxSUV of 6.6 to be the optimal cut-off point. The 4-year survival of patients with a maxSUV of 6.6 or less was 89%, whereas it was only 31% for those patients with values greater than 6.6 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The maxSUV of an esophageal cancer on dedicated FDG-PET scan is an independent predictor of stage, tumor characteristics, and survival. It predicts survival better than the current TNM staging system. This information may help guide treatment strategies.
BACKGROUND: The stage of esophageal cancer is currently determined by the anatomic TNM classification system as opposed to information about tumor biology. METHODS: A retrospective review was made of a prospective electronic database. Patients had esophageal cancer, dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) and maximum standardized uptake value (maxSUV) measured. Biopsies were obtained from suspicious nodal and systemic locations, and when indicated, resection with complete lymphadenectomy was performed. RESULTS: There were 89 patients (53 men). The median maxSUV for patients with high grade dysplasia, stage I, IIa, IIb, III, and IVa esophageal cancer was 1.7, 2.9, 8.9, 7.7, 9.5, and 12, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed patients with a high maxSUV were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumors (risk ratio 1.89, p = 0.032) and advanced stage (risk ratio 2.6, p < 0.001). The maxSUV correlated better (r(2) = 0.85) than the current TNM staging system for survival (r(2) = 0.68). Receiving operator characteristics curve demonstrated a maxSUV of 6.6 to be the optimal cut-off point. The 4-year survival of patients with a maxSUV of 6.6 or less was 89%, whereas it was only 31% for those patients with values greater than 6.6 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The maxSUV of an esophageal cancer on dedicated FDG-PET scan is an independent predictor of stage, tumor characteristics, and survival. It predicts survival better than the current TNM staging system. This information may help guide treatment strategies.
Authors: Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: James Welsh; Arya Amini; Anna Likhacheva; Jeremy Erasmus J; Daniel Gomez; Marta Davila; Reza J Mehran; Ritsuko Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jeffrey Lee H; Manoop S Bhutani; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.075
Authors: Hyun Woo Chung; Kyung-Han Lee; Eun Jeong Lee; Su Jin Lee; Young Seok Cho; Joon Young Choi; Young Mog Shim; Kwhanmien Kim; Byung-Tae Kim Journal: World J Surg Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Johannes B Roedl; Elkan F Halpern; Rivka R Colen; Dushyant V Sahani; Alan J Fischman; Michael A Blake Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Jang Eun Lee; Sang Woo Kim; Jin Su Kim; Kyu Yong Choi; Won Kyung Kang; Seong Taek Oh; Ie Ryung Yoo; Sung Hoon Kim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 5.742